BP Would A Large Unix file be easier to search than the individual msgs?
MDP ... If you have a plain text editor with good search capabilities,
MDP then yes.
Such as www.ultraedit.com Sorry for advertising a commercial product
but as a software engineer I use it every day.
--
From
On Saturday, July 22, 2000, 11:46:23 AM, Jamie Dainton wrote:
BP Would A Large Unix file be easier to search than the individual msgs?
MDP ... If you have a plain text editor with good search capabilities,
MDP then yes.
Such as www.ultraedit.com Sorry for advertising a commercial
Saturday, July 22, 2000, 8:46:23 AM, Jamie wrote:
BP Would A Large Unix file be easier to search than the individual msgs?
MDP ... If you have a plain text editor with good search capabilities,
MDP then yes.
Such as www.ultraedit.com Sorry for advertising a commercial product
but as a
On Thursday, July 20, 2000, 8:18:56 PM, Januk Aggarwal wrote:
Two problems that I experience. First, all the headers are included when
you save messages *.msg.
CO Sorry, I don't understand. Why is this a problem? This is what TB
CO *should* be doing.
All of the headers are included when
On Friday, July 21, 2000, 12:36:32 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
nnn I have found some threading is totally out of whack -- totally unrelated
nnn messages appear under one thread -- they are not from mailing list, from
nnn different senders with different subjects, etc.
Yes, very strange
these points on the subject
of "Archiving old mail messages":
ML Don't select the "Message files (.MSG)" option when you export. Use
ML the "Unix Mailbox" option instead. The output would be a perfectly
ML readable plain text file with all the messages you selec
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: E-mailaholics International
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Nick Andriash on TBUDL [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Archiving old mail messages
In-reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMA
Hi Nick,
On 21 July 2000 at 01:52:49 GMT -0700 (which was 09:52 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "Archiving old mail messages":
NA Is there some way to eliminate all of the above headers being
NA included... through use of the Save Messag
Hi Marck, Nick and others,
What is needed is a new option - to save multiple messages to a
single file.
This is a wish-list issue :-)
I have no idea what you guys are whining about. ;-) TB can do this
now. I've just use ctrl-+ to expand this whole thread from Lawrence
down, select all of
Hi Ming-Li,
On 21 July 2000 at 06:20:01 GMT -0700 (which was 14:20 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "Archiving old mail messages":
What is needed is a new option - to save multiple messages to a
single file.
This is a wish-list issue
On Friday, July 21, 2000, 6:50:20 AM, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
MDP I never need to do this - I just took Nick's word for it that it
MDP didn't happen... that'll teach me to check.
Well, I must admit that I _am_ at fault... I was only going by what the
originator of this thread was
Hi Marck,
I keep them all and have 64k+ in my message base at present. IMHO
The best method for handling high volume folders to have come up
so far is to have a main and archive folder and let a filter copy
incoming mail to both. Give the "main" folder a size or time
limit to keep the
I'm sure this subject has probably been discussed at one time, but I
can't find anything on it.
It's a simple situation and the answer will probably involve filters
or some such thing but here goes anyway:
In the short time that I have been using TB!, I have managed to
accumulate
On Thu, 20 Jul 2000 15:05:47 -0400, Lawrence Kalmakoff wrote:
LK What have users been doing (if anything) to off-load old messages
LK while still being able to view them, if necessary?
I created another account solely for archiving purposes. Since I
can filter based on message age,
Hi Lawrence,
In the short time that I have been using TB!, I have managed to
accumulate over 6000 messages, some of which I would like to
off-load to an archive-type file. One of the few features that
I liked about Outlook 98 was its ability to archive old/selected
messages. I
C I created another account solely for archiving purposes. Since I
C can filter based on message age, I can archive messages by using read
C message filters to move messages to the archive account folders.I run
C them manually at interval periods.
I created two sub-folders for Inbox
I'm using The Bat! Version 1.44
Serial Number EC7D7F61
under Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 .
MDP to both. Give the "main" folder a size or time limit to keep the size
MDP down. This makes it easy to browse "current" mail yet still have an
MDP easily accessible archive.
One good
Hello Ming-Li,
Thursday, July 20, 2000, 3:17:22 PM, you wrote:
In the short time that I have been using TB!, I have managed to
accumulate over 6000 messages, some of which I would like to
off-load to an archive-type file. One of the few features that
I liked about Outlook 98 was
Hi Ben,
On 21 July 2000 at 17:07:59 GMT -0600 (which was 00:07 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "Archiving old mail messages":
ML Don't select the "Message files (.MSG)" option when you export. Use
ML the "Unix Mailbox&qu
On Thu, 20 Jul 2000 22:18:51 +0100, Miguel Anjo wrote:
MA I created two sub-folders for Inbox and Sent and then I also use
MA read message filters like Curtis.
MA Is there any advantage to use a separate account instead of a separate
MA folder in the same account?
MA I speak in terms
Thursday, July 20, 2000, 5:10:24 PM, Curtis wrote:
C On Thu, 20 Jul 2000 15:05:47 -0400, Lawrence Kalmakoff wrote:
LK What have users been doing (if anything) to off-load old messages
LK while still being able to view them, if necessary?
C I created another account solely for
Hi SRNA,
On Thu, 20 Jul 2000 21:59:09 -0400GMT (21/07/2000, 09:59 +0800GMT),
SRNA wrote:
C I created another account solely for archiving purposes. Since I
C can filter based on message age, I can archive messages by using read
C message filters to move messages to the archive account
On Thursday, July 20, 2000, 2:17:22 PM, Ming-Li wrote:
ML Don't select the "Message files (.MSG)" option when you export. Use
ML the "Unix Mailbox" option instead. The output would be a perfectly
ML readable plain text file with all the messages you select.
Two problems that I experience.
Hello Nick,
On Thursday, July 20, 2000 at 19:31:06 GMT -0700 (which was 7:31 PM
where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
Two problems that I experience. First, all the headers are included when
you save messages *.msg.
Sorry, I don't understand. Why is this a problem? This is what TB
24 matches
Mail list logo
