Hello Robin,
Monday, January 14, 2008, 9:59:17 PM, you wrote:
> Actually the other way around!
I have tried both and can not see any difference in the results.
--
Thanks,
Terry
Using the Bat! 3.99.3
under Windows XP Service Pack 2 2600
Cu
Robin Anson @ 2008-1-14 9:59:17 PM
"Attachments question"
>>> Also, there is an option to "bind attachments only when sending out
>>> mail". What does this mean?
> Actually the other way around! If you check it, the version of the
> file that is cur
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 at 19:56:11 -0600, Christopher wrote:
>> Also, there is an option to "bind attachments only when sending out
>> mail". What does this mean?
>
> If unchecked, right before the message is sent, The Bat! will open the
> attached file and encode it. Any changes you make between atta
Hello NickOhare,
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:29:30 -0500 GMT (15/01/2008, 01:29 +0700 GMT),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
NZc> So to my question. If I split the attachments from the emails
NZc> will this help? I noticed that you can give attachments their own
NZc> special directory, rather than keeping the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] @ 2008-1-14 12:29:30 PM
"Attachments question"
> Hi All,
> I recently posted a question about the maximum file (.tbb) size that
> the Bat! can handle. My friend started getting warnings when the
> inbox approached 2 gigs. That number stunned me (an
Hi All,
I recently posted a question about the maximum file (.tbb) size that
the Bat! can handle. My friend started getting warnings when the
inbox approached 2 gigs. That number stunned me (and a few of you) as
I have over 20,000 messages in 1 account and it's barely 100 megs.
As it turns out,
Hello Tb!-Udl,
I've been saving my attachments within my message-base for a few
years, and now I've got a problem:
some of the attachments contain virusses (never picked up by any
virus scanner but picked up now by using the Kaspersky AV plugin for
tb!) which I'm unable to disinfect (pr
7 matches
Mail list logo
