Hello Jonathan,
On Wednesday, February 5, 2003 at 11:42:26 PM you [JA] wrote (at least
in part):
Hmmm... it's interesting. Maybe your recent tries were successful
because you're using an 1.63 Beta/5 version of the TB!. Mine was
1.62e and is 1.62i now.
No. I've tried it making a native telnet
On Thursday, February 6, 2003, 8:25:15 AM, Peter Palmreuther wrote:
I guess something thinks there's a regular expression in this
string. Maybe some used components that could show that string would
interpret a text to show containing '[...]' as regular expression
and therefore the period as
Hello!
I have found a bug which prevents messages to be sent to an IP address
directly (e.g. mailbox@[192.168.203.12]). Here is a good example.
---[Cut]---
[andris@strigidae scripts]$ host mail.tp.ru.
mail.tp.ru has address 80.80.100.216
mail.tp.ru mail is handled (pri=5) by tp.aaanet.ru
Hello Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris),
On or about Wednesday, February 05, 2003 at 21:14:26GMT +0300
(which was 1:14 PM in the tropics where I live) Andrey G. Sergeev
(AKA Andris) postulated:
AGSAA I have found a bug which prevents messages to be sent to an IP address
AGSAA directly (e.g.
Hallo Andrey,
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003 21:14:26 +0300GMT (5-2-03, 19:14 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
AGSAA I have found a bug which prevents messages to be sent to an IP
AGSAA address directly (e.g. mailbox@[192.168.203.12]). Here is a
AGSAA good example.
[192.168.203.12] isn't an ip-address.
Hello Spike,
On Wednesday, February 5, 2003 at 8:49:01 PM you [S] wrote (at least
in part):
AGSAA I have found a bug which prevents messages to be sent to an IP address
AGSAA directly (e.g. mailbox@[192.168.203.12]). Here is a good example.
S 8 Snipped alot!
S Correct me if I am wrong,
I'll
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, February 05, 2003, Roelof Otten wrote...
AGSAA I have found a bug which prevents messages to be sent to an
IP AGSAA address directly (e.g. mailbox@[192.168.203.12]). Here is
a AGSAA good example.
[192.168.203.12] isn't an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, February 05, 2003, Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris) wrote...
I have found a bug which prevents messages to be sent to an IP
address directly (e.g. mailbox@[192.168.203.12]).
[..]
In case you want anyone at mail.tp.ru host to be
Hello Jonathan Angliss,
On or about Wednesday, February 05, 2003 at 14:26:01GMT -0600
(which was 3:26 PM in the tropics where I live) Jonathan Angliss
responded:
JA I had noticed that it did this, but I just sent myself two emails just
JA fine, one via a postfix SMTP server, and one via a
Hallo Jonathan,
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003 14:18:38 -0600GMT (5-2-03, 21:18 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
JA IP addresses in mailing addresses need to be encased in [ ]
JA otherwise the mail doesn't send. They're called domain literals in
JA the RFC (see RFC822 sec 6.2.3). They are strongly suggested
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, February 05, 2003, Spike wrote...
JA I had noticed that it did this, but I just sent myself two emails
JA just fine, one via a postfix SMTP server, and one via a sendmail
JA SMTP server. Once each over telnet, and via TB!, all 4 arrived
Hello Roelof Otten,
On or about Wednesday, February 05, 2003 at 21:41:18GMT +0100
(which was 3:41 PM in the tropics where I live) Roelof Otten
ruminated:
JA IP addresses in mailing addresses need to be encased in [ ]
JA otherwise the mail doesn't send. They're called domain literals in
JA the
Hello Roelof,
On Wednesday, February 5, 2003 at 9:41:18 PM you [RO] wrote (at least
in part):
RO Without [] I got a test delivered
Which is strange enough. The square brackets are for the server being
able to distinguish between dot-delimited host.network.name and an
IP-address.
Really strange
Hello!
Wed Feb 5 2003 23:26:01 Jonathan Angliss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately the The Bat! converts such directly routed addresses
to the following form causing another bounce:
JA [..]
To: postmaster@[80\.80\.100\.216]
^
JA I had noticed that it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, February 05, 2003, Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris) wrote...
To: postmaster@[80\.80\.100\.216]
^
JA I had noticed that it did this, but I just sent myself two emails
JA just fine, one via a postfix SMTP
15 matches
Mail list logo