Re: Couldn't mail to an IP address directly

2003-02-06 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hello Jonathan, On Wednesday, February 5, 2003 at 11:42:26 PM you [JA] wrote (at least in part): Hmmm... it's interesting. Maybe your recent tries were successful because you're using an 1.63 Beta/5 version of the TB!. Mine was 1.62e and is 1.62i now. No. I've tried it making a native telnet

Re: Couldn't mail to an IP address directly

2003-02-06 Thread Julian Beach (Lists)
On Thursday, February 6, 2003, 8:25:15 AM, Peter Palmreuther wrote: I guess something thinks there's a regular expression in this string. Maybe some used components that could show that string would interpret a text to show containing '[...]' as regular expression and therefore the period as

[Bug] Couldn't mail to an IP address directly

2003-02-05 Thread Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris)
Hello! I have found a bug which prevents messages to be sent to an IP address directly (e.g. mailbox@[192.168.203.12]). Here is a good example. ---[Cut]--- [andris@strigidae scripts]$ host mail.tp.ru. mail.tp.ru has address 80.80.100.216 mail.tp.ru mail is handled (pri=5) by tp.aaanet.ru

Re: [Bug] Couldn't mail to an IP address directly

2003-02-05 Thread Spike
Hello Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris), On or about Wednesday, February 05, 2003 at 21:14:26GMT +0300 (which was 1:14 PM in the tropics where I live) Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris) postulated: AGSAA I have found a bug which prevents messages to be sent to an IP address AGSAA directly (e.g.

Re: [Bug] Couldn't mail to an IP address directly

2003-02-05 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Andrey, On Wed, 5 Feb 2003 21:14:26 +0300GMT (5-2-03, 19:14 +0100, where I live), you wrote: AGSAA I have found a bug which prevents messages to be sent to an IP AGSAA address directly (e.g. mailbox@[192.168.203.12]). Here is a AGSAA good example. [192.168.203.12] isn't an ip-address.

Re: Couldn't mail to an IP address directly

2003-02-05 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hello Spike, On Wednesday, February 5, 2003 at 8:49:01 PM you [S] wrote (at least in part): AGSAA I have found a bug which prevents messages to be sent to an IP address AGSAA directly (e.g. mailbox@[192.168.203.12]). Here is a good example. S 8 Snipped alot! S Correct me if I am wrong, I'll

Re: [Bug] Couldn't mail to an IP address directly

2003-02-05 Thread Jonathan Angliss
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday, February 05, 2003, Roelof Otten wrote... AGSAA I have found a bug which prevents messages to be sent to an IP AGSAA address directly (e.g. mailbox@[192.168.203.12]). Here is a AGSAA good example. [192.168.203.12] isn't an

Re: [Bug] Couldn't mail to an IP address directly

2003-02-05 Thread Jonathan Angliss
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday, February 05, 2003, Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris) wrote... I have found a bug which prevents messages to be sent to an IP address directly (e.g. mailbox@[192.168.203.12]). [..] In case you want anyone at mail.tp.ru host to be

Re[2]: [Bug] Couldn't mail to an IP address directly

2003-02-05 Thread Spike
Hello Jonathan Angliss, On or about Wednesday, February 05, 2003 at 14:26:01GMT -0600 (which was 3:26 PM in the tropics where I live) Jonathan Angliss responded: JA I had noticed that it did this, but I just sent myself two emails just JA fine, one via a postfix SMTP server, and one via a

Re: [Bug] Couldn't mail to an IP address directly

2003-02-05 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Jonathan, On Wed, 5 Feb 2003 14:18:38 -0600GMT (5-2-03, 21:18 +0100, where I live), you wrote: JA IP addresses in mailing addresses need to be encased in [ ] JA otherwise the mail doesn't send. They're called domain literals in JA the RFC (see RFC822 sec 6.2.3). They are strongly suggested

Re: [Bug] Couldn't mail to an IP address directly

2003-02-05 Thread Jonathan Angliss
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday, February 05, 2003, Spike wrote... JA I had noticed that it did this, but I just sent myself two emails JA just fine, one via a postfix SMTP server, and one via a sendmail JA SMTP server. Once each over telnet, and via TB!, all 4 arrived

Re[2]: [Bug] Couldn't mail to an IP address directly

2003-02-05 Thread Spike
Hello Roelof Otten, On or about Wednesday, February 05, 2003 at 21:41:18GMT +0100 (which was 3:41 PM in the tropics where I live) Roelof Otten ruminated: JA IP addresses in mailing addresses need to be encased in [ ] JA otherwise the mail doesn't send. They're called domain literals in JA the

Re: Couldn't mail to an IP address directly

2003-02-05 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hello Roelof, On Wednesday, February 5, 2003 at 9:41:18 PM you [RO] wrote (at least in part): RO Without [] I got a test delivered Which is strange enough. The square brackets are for the server being able to distinguish between dot-delimited host.network.name and an IP-address. Really strange

Re: [Bug] Couldn't mail to an IP address directly

2003-02-05 Thread Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris)
Hello! Wed Feb 5 2003 23:26:01 Jonathan Angliss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Unfortunately the The Bat! converts such directly routed addresses to the following form causing another bounce: JA [..] To: postmaster@[80\.80\.100\.216] ^ JA I had noticed that it

Re: [Bug] Couldn't mail to an IP address directly

2003-02-05 Thread Jonathan Angliss
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday, February 05, 2003, Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris) wrote... To: postmaster@[80\.80\.100\.216] ^ JA I had noticed that it did this, but I just sent myself two emails JA just fine, one via a postfix SMTP