Hello Ian,
On Wednesday, July 21, 2021 you wrote:
IAW> G'day Jack,
>> Anyone have any idea why the filter caught 39 of them and not any of the
>> others?
IAW> I have a similar situation where I use the following common filter for
incoming messages.
IAW> The "members" of the group are set
Hello Stuart,
On Wednesday, July 21, 2021 you wrote:
SC> Hello Jack,
SC> A reminder of what Jack S. LaRosa typed on:
SC> July 21, 2021 at 12:46:20 GMT -0500
JSL>> It seems so simple and as I mentioned, a "re-filter" action on the source
folder
JSL>> did find 39 of the emails contained in
Hello Jack,
A reminder of what Jack S. LaRosa typed on:
July 21, 2021 at 12:46:20 GMT -0500
JSL> It seems so simple and as I mentioned, a "re-filter" action on the source
folder
JSL> did find 39 of the emails contained in the block of addresses. But only on
the
JSL> first re-filter.
Hello MAU,
On Wednesday, July 21, 2021 you wrote:
M> Hello Jack,
>> I have a folder which contains multiple unique emails from a particular
>> group of
>> people. They were originally moved there manually. I wanted to create a
>> filter
>> for the source folder to look for the characters in
Hello Jack,
> I have a folder which contains multiple unique emails from a particular group
> of
> people. They were originally moved there manually. I wanted to create a filter
> for the source folder to look for the characters in their email addresses
> which
> appear before the @ sign, then
Hello TBUDL'ers,
I have a folder which contains multiple unique emails from a particular group of
people. They were originally moved there manually. I wanted to create a filter
for the source folder to look for the characters in their email addresses which
appear before the @ sign, then move
Hello Everyone,
I am hoping for some clarification re filter rules.
I would like to streamline emails generated on a website to different
accounts ( in my bat and external) depending on who works on them.
I set up some filter but I am afraid I have not fully understood the
way they should work
Hello Tom,
All filters are set to continue processing with other filters.
snipped
So if filter rule 3 is met, the journey ends in folder Bounce but
otherwise rule 4 should apply.
You should then set filter 3 to NOT continue processing with other
filters
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech
Tuesday, January 22, 2008, 12:03:30 PM, you wrote:
T Anyway, I will try to inactivate the filter and see what happens
T first.
Don't inactivate any filter. Just take that frigging tickmark off the
Continue option in the first filter, that's all.
Thomas,
thanks again for your patience.
Hello Tom,
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:02:50 +1100 GMT (22/01/2008, 19:02 +0700 GMT),
Tom wrote:
T thanks again for your patience.
T Everything is working fine now.
You are most welcome. Thanks for your feedback.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Was ist ein Optimist ? - Jemand der das eine Fernsehprogramm
Hello Tom,
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:09:12 +1100 GMT (21/01/2008, 11:09 +0700 GMT),
Tom wrote:
T here we go again:
T 1. Filter:
This is in Account A. It moves the messages to the bounce folder in
Account B. You say it works.
T 2. Filter:
Is this also in Account A? Since the first filter is set
Hi
On Monday 21 January 2008 at 5:09:16 AM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Christopher W. wrote:
If you copy it into a new message, then you can hold down ALT and do a
columnar selection.
Wow that's cool! Is it a TB! feature or a general wp feature?
--
Best regards,
MFPA
Hi Christopher,
On Monday, January 21, 2008 at 12:09:16 AM you wrote:
C Thomas Fernandez @ 2008-1-20 7:56:57 PM
C Filter Help mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please post the filters without the at the beginning. The way
you posted them, I would have to copy from your mail into a word
processor, take
MFPA @ 2008-1-21 9:39:23 AM
Filter Help mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you copy it into a new message, then you can hold down ALT and
do a columnar selection.
Wow that's cool! Is it a TB! feature or a general wp feature?
It seems to be a feature of more powerful text editors, like MicroEd
and my
Monday, January 21, 2008, 11:08:29 PM, you wrote:
Hello Tom,
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:09:12 +1100 GMT (21/01/2008, 11:09 +0700 GMT),
Tom wrote:
T here we go again:
T 1. Filter:
This is in Account A. It moves the messages to the bounce folder in
Account B. You say it works.
T 2. Filter:
Hello Tom,
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:16:29 +1100 GMT (22/01/2008, 04:16 +0700 GMT),
Tom wrote:
T Thomas, thanks for your assistance. You are right with respect to the
T accounts but that does not fully solve the issue.
OK. Good that we are clear which filter is in which account.
T I understand
Hello Tom,
On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 18:38:17 +1100 GMT (20/01/2008, 14:38 +0700 GMT),
Tom wrote:
T What exactly do you want me to post? I thought I had provided the
T details of the filter already?
To post the filter, you right-click on it and choose copy. Then you
paste it into your message. I am
Sunday, January 20, 2008, 7:47:17 PM, you wrote:
To post the filter, you right-click on it and choose copy. Then you
paste it into your message. I am posting my TBUDL filter here for
demonstration:
Yes, but my guess is that you overlooked something.
thanks - I am sure you are right - here
Hi
On Sunday 20 January 2008 at 8:47:17 AM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Thomas
Fernandez wrote:
Yes, but my guess is that you overlooked something.
Like maybe a tick in continue processing with other filters?
--
Best regards,
MFPA
No matter where you go, there
Hello MFPA,
On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 21:06:51 + GMT (21/01/2008, 04:06 +0700 GMT),
MFPA wrote:
Yes, but my guess is that you overlooked something.
M Like maybe a tick in continue processing with other filters?
We will see this when we import the filters.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
BALDERDASH:
Hello Tom,
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 07:39:16 +1100 GMT (21/01/2008, 03:39 +0700 GMT),
Tom wrote:
T This filter is on the account that actually carries the incoming
T message:
TB! Message Filter
Please post the filters without the at the beginning. The way you
posted them, I would have
Monday, January 21, 2008, 12:56:57 PM, you wrote:
TB! Message Filter
Please post the filters without the at the beginning. The way you
posted them, I would have to copy from your mail into a word
processor, take all these quote marks out manually, and then copy from
there into
Thomas Fernandez @ 2008-1-20 7:56:57 PM
Filter Help mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please post the filters without the at the beginning. The way
you posted them, I would have to copy from your mail into a word
processor, take all these quote marks out manually, and then copy
from
Hello Everyone,
despite testing, tweaking and tearing of hairs, I am still having
trouble with a specific filter and hope someone here can help me.
I would like to filter bounce messages coming from a website into
a specific folder. Customers receive a confirmation email when placing
orders or
Hello Tom,
A reminder of what Tom typed on:
Saturday, January 19, 2008 at 10:41:08 GMT +1100
T Is there a better criteria I should look for in the header for my
T filter or another reason why my setup is failing. I just would like
T all incoming mails in Account B with the bounces separated
Hello Tom,
On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 10:41:08 +1100 GMT (20/01/2008, 06:41 +0700 GMT),
Tom wrote:
T This filter is set up as: if recipient contains [EMAIL PROTECTED] move to
T the folder \Account B\Customer in.
T This works fine.
T I put up a new filter ahead of this for the bounces:
T if Text
Sunday, January 20, 2008, 1:43:54 PM, you wrote:
Hello Tom,
On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 10:41:08 +1100 GMT (20/01/2008, 06:41 +0700 GMT),
Tom wrote:
T This filter is set up as: if recipient contains [EMAIL PROTECTED] move to
T the folder \Account B\Customer in.
T This works fine.
T I put up a new
I went around this a couple weeks ago and have been playing with the
suggestions since then. They do not work.
Given:
Spam Filter imbedded in Firewall/AV/Spam commercial software detects
what it thinks is spam and adds an 'X-found-spam' to the headers.
Mailing Lists can set the To: field to
Hello Robert,
On Wed, 3 May 2006 06:46:01 -0400 GMT (03/05/2006, 17:46 +0700 GMT),
Robert D. wrote:
RD Help please. Or admit we need to be able to examine AB against
RD Reply-To field and it's variants.
Header field Reply-To contains
AND
Addressbook contains Sender and all recipients
Thomas Fernandez waved a wand then said : '
TF Header field Reply-To contains
that's as we say here, 'The Rub' Reply-To contains :
An Address Group (((Lists in my case))
IS in ANY friendly AB would be OK
IS on a whitelist would be OK
But, as implemented by TB! can only compare to a
Hello tbudl,
I'm trying to create a filter that will move both incoming and
outgoing messages to a single folder, based on the name of the sender
or recipient. That is, I'm trying to collect both messages to and from
one individual in the same folder for future reference. Incoming
messages work
Hello Munango-Keewati,
Tuesday, December 14, 2004, 9:10:31 PM, you wrote:
MK Any suggestions on how to make this work?
Do you have this in the Sorting Office under outgoing mail as well as
Incoming Mail. Actually, you don't have to have Sender and Recipient
in both, just sender in Incoming and
On Tuesday, December 14, 2004, 9:22:08 PM, you wrote:
Hello Munango-Keewati,
Tuesday, December 14, 2004, 9:10:31 PM, you wrote:
MK Any suggestions on how to make this work?
Do you have this in the Sorting Office under outgoing mail as well as
Incoming Mail. Actually, you don't have to have
On Tue 14-Dec-04 9:10pm -0600, Munango-Keewati wrote:
I'm trying to create a filter that will move both incoming and
outgoing messages to a single folder, based on the name of the sender
or recipient. That is, I'm trying to collect both messages to and from
one individual in the same folder
Thursday, October 30, 2003
8:06:34 PM
Hi,
Im trying to set up a autoresponder that will include my public pgp
key when requested. I cant seem to get the filters correct to do it. I
set up a response email using the attachfile macro and then select
my pgp key but the email goes without any
I have the following in the subject filter line:
--
Best regards,
Jon mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current Ver: 1.60m
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives :
Hi, all,
tracer wrote...
t thanks for the list but if you analyse what you get, its 90% of what I
t kill.
I had to go back to see what you meant by that, and found this:
On the other hand what works extreemly well, is to dump any email
where sender or receiver has NOT an @ in the header.
\\\|///
/ ~ _ \
(- O o -)
--oOOo-(_)-oOOo---
Hello John,
JDH Received: from unknown
JDH It turns out this kind of header can occur even in non-SPAM mail
JDH depending on the server
Hello tracer,
Wednesday, February 09, 2000, 2:36:45 AM, you wrote:
t You want to kill filter spam??
t Agreed, I like to be able to kill any email where sender = receiver but
t obviously not being myself
t tracer
When I click on Kill Filter - New, I only see an empty window called
Signal
Hello Istvn Szendr,
On Wed, 9 Feb 2000 18:29:14 +0100 GMT your local time,
which was Thursday, February 10, 2000, 12:29:14 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Istvn Szendr wrote:
Hello tracer,
Wednesday, February 09, 2000, 2:36:45 AM, you wrote:
t You want to kill filter spam??
t Agreed, I like to
Hello tracer,
Wednesday, February 09, 2000, 7:05:33 PM, you wrote:
t The problem is that what you want to do, ie the above, is something I
t like to do, but sofar it seems to be impossible in the Bat.
Thank you for your help.
I thought everybody knew how to do it but me...
Hope to see the
Hello Istvn Szendr,
On Wed, 9 Feb 2000 19:32:10 +0100 GMT your local time,
which was Thursday, February 10, 2000, 1:32:10 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Istvn Szendr wrote:
Hello tracer,
Wednesday, February 09, 2000, 7:05:33 PM, you wrote:
t The problem is that what you want to do, ie the
Hi, all,
The features suggested for kill filters would be nice, but for now
we are at least able to build three lists of strings -- for the
originator (see sample below; you are all free to copy from it), for
subjects, and for "routing," which I assume is any string appearing
in the
Hello all,
I want to set up a kill filter but feel somewhat intimidated by the
empty Signal Strings window that only shows radio buttons for "Detect
by".
Could someone please help me in how to set it up? (I want to kill all
messages that have the same string after the "@" in Form and To.)
Hello Istvn Szendr,
On Tue, 8 Feb 2000 21:10:32 +0100 GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, February 09, 2000, 3:10:32 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Istvn Szendr wrote:
Hello all,
I want to set up a kill filter but feel somewhat intimidated by the
empty Signal Strings window that only
HI TB Users,
I flashed one request sometimes back and go no answers so I'm posting it
again.
The problem is serious and I just couldn't solve it.
Whenever I create a filter and close the program the filter goes away. I
have tried all the setting and all seems to be ok.
Can someone tell me
Hallo Shanmugam,
On Sun, 30 Jan 2000 21:05:43 +0700 (GMT+0700) GMT (30.01.2000, 22:05 +0800 GMT),
Shanmugam Ganeshkumar wrote:
SG Whenever I create a filter and close the program the filter goes away. I
SG have tried all the setting and all seems to be ok.
I cannot help you, because the
On Sun, 30 Jan 2000 23:30:28 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
SG Whenever I create a filter and close the program the filter goes
SG away. I have tried all the setting and all seems to be ok.
I cannot help you, because the problem does not exist here. Sorry.
I don't have the problem
Hello Shanmugam Ganeshkumar,
On Sunday, January 30, 2000 at 21:05:43 GMT +0700 (GMT+0700) (which
was 31/01/2000 21:05 GMT + 0700 my Local Time) you told to the list:
SG Whenever I create a filter and close the program the filter goes
SG away. I have tried all the setting and all seems to
Hi G.,
On Mon, 17 Jan 2000 18:10:32 -0500GMT (18/01/2000, 07:10 +0800GMT),
G. Cowling, SRNA wrote:
GCS Is there any way to set up a filter which can redirect a message to an
GCS address contained in the text of the original message?
This should be possible with Regular Expressions, if I am not
50 matches
Mail list logo
