Re: General questions

2002-10-01 Thread Ricardo M. Reyes
SM If some third party should happen to reply to this message SM off-list, my system will do the normal processing on it, unless I have SM a way to whitelist messageIDs, in which case, TB! will see that the SM incoming In-Reply-To matches an outgoing MessageID. you can create a list of the

Re[2]: General questions

2002-09-30 Thread Joseph N.
On Monday, September 30, 2002, Scott McNay wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: SM A target folder is ok, since I sooner or later move my sent mail SM to the inbox anyway, to be automatically sorted by the same SM filters that handle incoming email Scott, That technique seems

Re: General questions

2002-09-30 Thread Ricardo M. Reyes
ACM It's better to just make a single filter, make it manual only and ACM assign it a hotkey. Make it add the the sender address to your ACM whitelist address book. Whenever you're replying to an address you ACM wish to add, just hit the shortcut for the filter. how about an 'Outgoing Filter' ?

Re: General questions

2002-09-30 Thread Lars Geiger
Hi Ricardo, On Monday, September 30, 2002 at 16:21:48 [GMT -0300], you wrote: RMR how about an 'Outgoing Filter' ? RMR It would white-list everyone you send a message to, and not exactly RMR everyone you reply to, but I guess it's close enough for most people. Or even better, make an outgoing

Re: General questions

2002-09-30 Thread Scott McNay
Hi Joseph! In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Monday, September 30, 2002, 8:08:30 AM, you wrote: SM A target folder is ok, since I sooner or later move my sent mail SM to the inbox anyway, to be automatically sorted by the same SM filters that handle incoming email JN

Re: General questions

2002-09-30 Thread Scott McNay
Hi Ricardo! In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Monday, September 30, 2002, 2:21:48 PM, you wrote: RMR how about an 'Outgoing Filter' ? RMR It would white-list everyone you send a message to, and not exactly RMR everyone you reply to, but I guess it's close enough for most

Re: General questions

2002-09-30 Thread Scott McNay
Hi Lars! In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Monday, September 30, 2002, 2:36:04 PM, you wrote: LG Although I'd guess from the original message that collecting the LG addresses from every person you write a message to would be just fine. Right; I don't see much point in

Re: General questions

2002-09-30 Thread Ricardo M. Reyes
SM Right; I don't see much point in restricting it to replies only. SM Now, if outgoing messageid's could be whitelisted also... what do you mean? -- Ricardo M. Reyes | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (Mar del Plata - Argentina) | Usando The Bat! 1.60c

Re: General questions

2002-09-30 Thread Scott McNay
Hi Ricardo! In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Monday, September 30, 2002, 8:46:56 PM, you wrote: SM Now, if outgoing messageid's could be whitelisted also... RMR what do you mean? Messages have message-IDs in the header. In your message, it looks like this:

General questions

2002-09-29 Thread Scott McNay
Hi, all! I have a couple of general questions, prompted by recent discussions. First, in the sorting office, you can set an email to have various addresses added to a specific address book. Is there any way to call this from a template? That way, if I reply to someone, I can have

Re: General questions

2002-09-29 Thread Allie C Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Scott Mcnay [SM] wrote:' SM First, in the sorting office, you can set an email to have SM various addresses added to a specific address book. Is there any SM way to call this from a template? That way, if

Re: General questions

2002-09-29 Thread Scott McNay
Hi Allie! In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sunday, September 29, 2002, 10:53:51 PM, you wrote: ACM In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], ACM Scott Mcnay [SM] wrote:' SM First, in the sorting office, you can set an email to have SM various addresses added to a