Hi Kiyan,
@ 4:19:11 AM on 5/6/2001, Kiyan Azarbar wrote:
KA> Is there a good FAQ out there that explains, step by step, how to
KA> set up GnuPG on Win32 and integrate it with the Bat? Well, I
KA> imagine that last bit is probably unlikely since 1.52c just
KA> "Shipped" yesterday.
Yes, you can j
Is there a good FAQ out there that explains, step by step, how to set up
GnuPG on Win32 and integrate it with the Bat? Well, I imagine that last bit
is probably unlikely since 1.52c just "Shipped" yesterday.
Anyway, I tried to download gnupg and gnupgshell, but no matter what
I do it doesn't resp
On 10/17/2000 at 12:35 AM, Graham wrote:
G> As this is not strictly about TB, perhaps we could continue this thread
G> off-list or through TBOT?
Actually, you put things into perspective wonderfully. Thank you.
Geo
--
George Mealer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
C is for Cthulhu, that's good enough for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 16 Oct 2000 15:31:22 -0700
George Mealer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
George> On 10/16/2000 at 1:20 PM, Marek Mikus wrote:
George> MM> No, GnuPG will not be implemented.
George>
George> MM> But will be implemented OpenPGP and I think it is be
Hello George Mealer,
On Mon, 16 Oct 2000 15:47:22 -0700 GMT your local time,
which was Tuesday, October 17, 2000, 5:47:22 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
George Mealer wrote:
> On 10/16/2000 at 1:20 PM, Marek Mikus wrote:
MM>> But will be implemented OpenPGP and I think it is better :-))
MM>> Watc
On 10/16/2000 at 1:20 PM, Marek Mikus wrote:
MM> But will be implemented OpenPGP and I think it is better :-))
MM> Watch for example to
MM> http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/openpgp-charter.html
Actually, I may have misunderstood. Are you saying that The Bat! will
become an OpenPGP-compliant cl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 16 Oct 2000 22:20:20 +0200
Marek Mikus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Marek> No, GnuPG will not be implemented.
Marek>
Marek> But will be implemented OpenPGP and I think it is better :-))
WOWW Marek! I'd agree with you, but I neve
On 10/16/2000 at 1:20 PM, Marek Mikus wrote:
MM> No, GnuPG will not be implemented.
MM> But will be implemented OpenPGP and I think it is better :-))
MM> Watch for example to
MM> http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/openpgp-charter.html
'sfine, OpenPGP is a standard, not a client (but you knew that
Hello all,
Monday, October 16, 2000, Graham wrote:
> Any chance that The Bat might support GnuPG as well as/instead of PGP?
No, GnuPG will not be implemented.
But will be implemented OpenPGP and I think it is better :-))
Watch for example to
http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/openpgp-charter.htm
The bat of happiness fluttered its wings and whispered to me that
Graham said on Monday, October 16, 2000:
> Any chance that The Bat might support GnuPG as well as/instead of PGP?
I've confirmed a few days ago that gpg (running on Solaris) will
accept a public key from the freeware verson of PGP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Any chance that The Bat might support GnuPG as well as/instead of PGP?
Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.3 (MingW32)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE56s2ItwKLKus4nE4RAjQoAKCIfLqZABepd5KglN
11 matches
Mail list logo
