Hey Wolfgang,
Wednesday, January 31, 2001, 8:32:02 AM, you wrote:
WK Hi Tim,
TM Is it possible to have a Rule move a message to another
TM account/folder without sending
WK Yes.
WK Dumb question: why didn't you simply try it?
Ouch!, don't you think that is a little harsh :-( especially
Hey Marck,
Friday, February 02, 2001, 12:56:23 PM, you wrote:
MDP Tim - you've got the wrong end of the stick here. This comment has
MDP been thrashed out (and Wolfgang has been called to account for it).
MDP Please try to contain your reactions and read to the end of a thread
MDP before
Hi Mike,
...
MY Since so many list members aren't native English speakers, we
MY shouldn't be overly sensitive to grammar errors, misspellings or
MY mangled idioms.
Thank you and all the others for your understanding. Rest assured
that I will try to be much more careful with such things in the
Hello Karin others on TBUDL following this thread,
Thursday, February 01, 2001, you stated regarding Wolfgang Kynast
asking:
In this particular case I was very amazed (translated
'verbluefft' correctly? )
KS The nicest translation for that is "flabbergasted". I love
KS that word.
Another
Hallo Wolfgang,
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001 11:21:13 +0100 GMT (01/02/2001, 18:21 +0800 GMT),
Wolfgang Kynast wrote:
T amazed = ERSTAUNT; STUTZIG
T verblfft = PERPLEXED; STAGGERED; NONPLUSED; BLANK; BEWILDERED
Funny, Langenscheidt gave me 'amazed' for 'verblfft'.
Our teacher warned us against
Hi Tim,
TM Is it possible to have a Rule move a message to another
TM account/folder without sending
Yes.
Dumb question: why didn't you simply try it?
--
Regards,
Wolfgang
Co-moderator TBUDL / TBBETA discussion lists
Using The Bat! 1.49 under Windows 95 4.0 Build B
in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Tim,
On 31 January 2001 at 21:23:21 -0500 (which was 02:23 where I live)
Tim Musson wrote and made these points:
TM Is it possible to have a Rule move a message to another
TM account/folder without sending (I know you can do a .forward
TM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Wolfgang,
Wednesday, January 31, 2001, 8:32:02 AM, you wrote:
WK Dumb question: why didn't you simply try it?
I hope you were just joking around when you said that. We all would
like people to try things and read the "manual" so to speak
Hi Gerry,
WK Dumb question: why didn't you simply try it?
GD I hope you were just joking around when you said that. We all would
GD like people to try things and read the "manual" so to speak before
GD asking a question, but, stating that a person had a dumb question is,
GD IMHO, not a good
Hi Nick,
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, at 11:04:57 -0800 you wrote:
NA At 10:35 AM 31/01/01, Gerry Doyon wrote:
I hope you were just joking around when you said that. We all
would like people to try things and read the "manual" so to
speak before asking a question, but, stating that a person had
a dumb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, at 20:59:22 [GMT +0100], Wolfgang Kynast wrote:
WK Sorry for my weak english: I wanted to qualify *my* question
WK as dumb. It was a translation from german, word by word, which
WK gives obviously another meaning in english.
11 matches
Mail list logo