Re[2]: Move msg to another Account?

2001-02-02 Thread Tim Musson
Hey Wolfgang, Wednesday, January 31, 2001, 8:32:02 AM, you wrote: WK Hi Tim, TM Is it possible to have a Rule move a message to another TM account/folder without sending WK Yes. WK Dumb question: why didn't you simply try it? Ouch!, don't you think that is a little harsh :-( especially

Re[2]: Move msg to another Account?

2001-02-02 Thread Tim Musson
Hey Marck, Friday, February 02, 2001, 12:56:23 PM, you wrote: MDP Tim - you've got the wrong end of the stick here. This comment has MDP been thrashed out (and Wolfgang has been called to account for it). MDP Please try to contain your reactions and read to the end of a thread MDP before

Re[2]: Move msg to another Account?

2001-02-01 Thread Wolfgang Kynast
Hi Mike, ... MY Since so many list members aren't native English speakers, we MY shouldn't be overly sensitive to grammar errors, misspellings or MY mangled idioms. Thank you and all the others for your understanding. Rest assured that I will try to be much more careful with such things in the

Re: Move msg to another Account? OT

2001-02-01 Thread Douglas Hinds
Hello Karin others on TBUDL following this thread, Thursday, February 01, 2001, you stated regarding Wolfgang Kynast asking: In this particular case I was very amazed (translated 'verbluefft' correctly? ) KS The nicest translation for that is "flabbergasted". I love KS that word. Another

OT: Dictionaries (was:Re: Move msg to another Account?)

2001-02-01 Thread Thomas
Hallo Wolfgang, On Thu, 1 Feb 2001 11:21:13 +0100 GMT (01/02/2001, 18:21 +0800 GMT), Wolfgang Kynast wrote: T amazed = ERSTAUNT; STUTZIG T verblfft = PERPLEXED; STAGGERED; NONPLUSED; BLANK; BEWILDERED Funny, Langenscheidt gave me 'amazed' for 'verblfft'. Our teacher warned us against

Re: Move msg to another Account?

2001-01-31 Thread Wolfgang Kynast
Hi Tim, TM Is it possible to have a Rule move a message to another TM account/folder without sending Yes. Dumb question: why didn't you simply try it? -- Regards, Wolfgang Co-moderator TBUDL / TBBETA discussion lists Using The Bat! 1.49 under Windows 95 4.0 Build B in

Re: Move msg to another Account?

2001-01-31 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Tim, On 31 January 2001 at 21:23:21 -0500 (which was 02:23 where I live) Tim Musson wrote and made these points: TM Is it possible to have a Rule move a message to another TM account/folder without sending (I know you can do a .forward TM

Re[2]: Move msg to another Account?

2001-01-31 Thread Gerry Doyon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Wolfgang, Wednesday, January 31, 2001, 8:32:02 AM, you wrote: WK Dumb question: why didn't you simply try it? I hope you were just joking around when you said that. We all would like people to try things and read the "manual" so to speak

Re[3]: Move msg to another Account?

2001-01-31 Thread Wolfgang Kynast
Hi Gerry, WK Dumb question: why didn't you simply try it? GD I hope you were just joking around when you said that. We all would GD like people to try things and read the "manual" so to speak before GD asking a question, but, stating that a person had a dumb question is, GD IMHO, not a good

Re: Move msg to another Account?

2001-01-31 Thread Lars Geiger
Hi Nick, On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, at 11:04:57 -0800 you wrote: NA At 10:35 AM 31/01/01, Gerry Doyon wrote: I hope you were just joking around when you said that. We all would like people to try things and read the "manual" so to speak before asking a question, but, stating that a person had a dumb

Re: Move msg to another Account?

2001-01-31 Thread Mike Yetto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, at 20:59:22 [GMT +0100], Wolfgang Kynast wrote: WK Sorry for my weak english: I wanted to qualify *my* question WK as dumb. It was a translation from german, word by word, which WK gives obviously another meaning in english.