Re[2]: Japanese Capability?

2001-06-07 Thread Yuki Taga
Thursday, June 07, 2001, 11:21:00 PM, Robert wrote: RK> This problem is one of the reasons why I am writing to inquire whether RK> the English Version of TB can flawlessly receive and send e-mail in RK> Japanese from a Win2000 machine. I have not had any definitive answers RK> yet but I thank t

Re[2]: Japanese in The Bat! and Win2000

2000-05-11 Thread phil
Greetings John! On Thursday, May 11, 2000 at 21:17:38 GMT +0900 (which was 5:17 AM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: JDH> Hi, phil, JDH> You wrote: p>> ³?µ?¢. ?»?ê ?à?Á?Æ -lŽq³?µ?¢?Å?»?Ì?±?¤?à?è! p>> Romaji Kanji here. Though I know nada-zero-nit about Japaneese. p>> If

Re[2]: Japanese in The Bat! and Win2000

2000-05-11 Thread phil
Greetings John! On Thursday, May 11, 2000 at 21:17:38 GMT +0900 (which was 5:17 AM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: JDH> Hi, phil, JDH> You wrote: p>> ³?µ?¢. ?»?ê ?à?Á?Æ -lŽq³?µ?¢?Å?»?Ì?±?¤?à?è! p>> Romaji Kanji here. Though I know nada-zero-nit about Japaneese. p>> If

Re[2]: Japanese in The Bat! and Win2000

2000-05-11 Thread phil
Greetings John! ³?µ?¢. ?»?ê ?à?Á?Æ -lŽq³?µ?¢?Å?»?Ì?±?¤?à?è! Romaji Kanji here. Though I know nada-zero-nit about Japaneese. If some of this comes out legible do tell me. Like word pad... heh heh, I get about the same results in the bat as I get in an editor called Unix Edit (which is simila

Re[2]: Japanese

2000-04-19 Thread Oleg Zalyalov
Hello, the Bat! list recipients, Wednesday, April 19, 2000, Christopher J. Trybowski wrote to Gary about Japanese: CJT> And now this ;). Well, Cyrillic is a totally different alphabet than CJT> any kind of CJK! It has a sensible number of characters, not like CJT> Japanese thousands. Do

Re[2]: Japanese

2000-04-17 Thread Gary
Hi Januk, On Monday, April 17, 2000, 3:39:36 PM, you wrote in part about "Japanese": J> Yes, at least one person has made it work that I know of. J> Unfortunately I can't seem to find the reference, but if you look J> in the TBUDL archives for January and February, you might have J> better l

Re[2]: Japanese

2000-04-17 Thread Gary
Hi Alexander, On Monday, April 17, 2000, 3:02:25 PM, you wrote in part about "Japanese": >> I have someone who is interested in TB! in the States here, and >> he wondered if he can receive things in Japanese. Does a >> Cyrillic character set cover this? A> Joking?;-) Cyrillic is for Sla