Re[2]: Spam Catchers

9/27/2013 10:56 AM Hi jb, On 9/27/2013 jb_lists...@trink.co.uk wrote: jtcu> Hello David Elliott, jtcu> On Friday, September 27, 2013, 3:47:52 PM, David Elliott wrote: >> What do you all use to catch SPAM? jtcu> AntiSpamSniper - http://www.antispamsniper.com jtcu> I have been using it for ye

Re: Re[2]: Spam mail

Op 29-11-2006, heeft MikeD (2) verondersteld : 'rar' is an 'archive' format much like 'zip' files. You have to 'unarchive' them as you would with a zip tile. That will give you the plugin as well as the other 'support' files that Regula needs. There will likely be a 'readme' or similar file th

Re[2]: Spam mail

Hello A.Translator, Wednesday, November 29, 2006, 5:37:31 AM, you wrote: AT> Alexander S. Kunz heeft uiteengezet op 28-11-2006 : >> I conclude that both Agava and Regula are good >> TB plugins. Personally AT> Can someone point me to an English installation guide for Regula? AT> I have downloade

Re[2]: Spam mail

Hi Peter, Monday, November 27, 2006, 9:18:10 PM, you wrote: >> lately I get a lot of spam with the subject line: wrote: As >> I hear lots of people are getting the same. >> Is there a way I can add a filter somewhere in the configuration >> that if the subject line is "wrote:" it should go to t

Re[2]: Spam Assassin thinks The Bat! can't send HTML message only

Hello Jernej, Thursday, November 3, 2005, 10:02:42 AM, you wrote: > Whoever's running that host should upgrade. SpamAssassin 3.0 came out a long > time ago. Yeah, I noticed that too. I've sent a ticket about it. -- John Sherman Using The Bat! 3.62.10 __

Re[2]: Spam Assassin thinks The Bat! can't send HTML message only

Hello Alexander, Thursday, November 3, 2005, 8:57:06 AM, you wrote: > The only thing that YOU can do is to disable TB's X-Mailer header, so that > no one can see that you are using TB. Go to Options | Preferences | General > and un-check the "Use X-Mailer header..." tickbox. Thank you Alexander.

Re[2]: spam email not sent to you

Hello Alexander, Friday, June 17, 2005, 9:10:23 AM, you wrote: > Hello finalcut & everyone else, > on 17-Jun-2005 at 13:50 you (finalcut) wrote: >>> So, a selective D/L filter with "Recipient does not contain >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" should work, BUT!!! if you're using such a filter, >>> you'l

Re[2]: spam email not sent to you

Hello Alexander, Thursday, June 16, 2005, 5:06:57 PM, you wrote: > Hello finalcut & everyone else, > on 16-Jun-2005 at 19:11 you (finalcut) wrote: >> But as you can see there http://finalcut.ca/spam2.png , I'm in the >> recipient. Is there a way in selective download filter to directly kill >>

Re[2]: SPAM and Message-IDs

Hello Alexander, On 02 October 2004 at 10:35:31GMT +0200 (which was 09:35 where I live) Alexander S. Kunz wrote and made these points on the subject of "SPAM and Message-IDs": ASK> Argh. Should be "not for common folders". Hell, I mix it up all the time (I ASK> have no account specific folders

Re[2]: SPAM and Message-IDs

Hello Allie, On 01 October 2004 at 17:49:42GMT -0500 (which was 23:49 where I live) Allie Martin wrote and made these points on the subject of "SPAM and Message-IDs": AM> Really? I thought the default reply template was this: AM> ,- / \ AM> | Hello %OFromFName, AM> | AM> | %ODateEn, %OTi

Re[2]: SPAM and Message-IDs

Hello Allie, On 01 October 2004 at 07:40:11GMT -0400 (which was 12:40 where I live) Allie Martin wrote and made these points on the subject of "SPAM and Message-IDs": AM> The %To macro, when placed in a folder's reply template, will override AM> this 'Reply to original sender' operation by eith

Re[2]: SPAM and Message-IDs

Friday, October 1, 2004, 3:11:13 AM, you wrote: MDP> My stock lecture also warned about people who say "it MDP> works for me". Let me do this job in peace, please. MDP> You have already mislead Lynn into unwarranted MDP> complacency. I don't know that I've been misled .. or not by Thorvald, anyw

Re[2]: SPAM and Message-IDs

Friday, October 1, 2004, 2:49:32 AM, you wrote: TN> TB functions in that way that it choses the Reply-To TN> of a message to figure out who the receiver should be. TN> And when the Reply-To is [EMAIL PROTECTED], it sends it there. TN> Even without folder templates. And I do not think it TN> is a

Re[2]: SPAM and Message-IDs (was: Re: How to filter such a message?)

Friday, October 1, 2004, 12:22:02 AM, you wrote: TN> It is not the fault of the folder template, it's the TN> reply-to setting of the message plus user's awareness TN> to do the right things at the right time... *veg* Yes, and I'm not sure my drive is big enough to put *all* your addies in my ab

Re[2]: SPAM and Message-IDs (was: Re: How to filter such a message?)

Thursday, September 30, 2004, 11:22:39 PM, you wrote: ASK> No you don't. ;-) Caught by the folder template! *veg* You're right, but I've got most of the egg scraped off now! lol! -- Lynn [EMAIL PROTECTED]* * *Aun Aprendo I'd rather be WARP'ed* * * Team OS/2 http://www.turriff

Re[2]: SPAM and Message-IDs

Hello Alexander, Friday, October 1, 2004, 3:27:12 PM, you wrote: >> What do I do with the folder templates? Delete everything that's in them? ASK> By default there's only a "%BLANK" in them... I didn't find a folder with such a reply template... Not even those that I created recently and of w

Re[2]: SPAM and Message-IDs

Hello Allie, Friday, October 1, 2004, 2:38:10 PM, you wrote: AM> You really don't need a folder template for lists like TBUDL that AM> insert the list address in the reply to header for each message it AM> sends to members. Actualy, I'm testing now. I'll try to send one message to the list and

Re[2]: SPAM and Message-IDs

Hello Allie, Friday, October 1, 2004, 2:38:10 PM, you wrote: AM> You need only create a single address book entry with the list address AM> as the entries address. Name the entry TBUDL. Create the templates you AM> need to use for the list. You can use whatever specialized template AM> you wish

Re[2]: SPAM and Message-IDs (was: Re: How to filter such a message?)

Thursday, September 30, 2004, 2:34:35 PM, you wrote: LG> Thursday, September 30, 2004, 2:05:56 PM, you wrote: L>> Oooh! Super taglines! Can I use them for L>> t-shirts lol! LG> Here's the thing about taglines. *All* taglines are LG> stolen. LG> and another from my tagline collection... LG>

Re[2]: SPAM and Message-IDs (was: Re: How to filter such a message?)

Thursday, September 30, 2004, 8:52:56 AM, you wrote: LG> Probably something similar to some of my taglines! :grin: LG> Moderator (n): See 'glutton for punishment'. LG> Moderator (n): See also - God, tyrant, egotist, LG> oppressor. LG> Moderator dies: .MPG at eleven! LG> Moderator Justification N

Re[2]: Spam Filtering

Hello all, Friday, May 21, 2004, Gene Brown wrote: > So, what do those choices about Average, Maximal and Minimal > really mean? Average of what? Minimal of what? this setting is needed, if You use more antispam plugins. -- Bye Marek Mikus Czech support of The Bat! http://www.thebat.cz Usin

Re[2]: Spam Filtering

On Friday, May 21, 2004, 6:00:44 AM, Andre wrote: > But 0.4 is pretty old and 0.5 works much better. From my experience you > have to retrain when you upgrade to 0.5, though. When I upgraded to 0.5, I not only had to retrain, but I ended up tanking all the files from any previous BayesIT installa

Re[2]: Spam Filtering

On 5/21/04, at 5:25 AM, Andre Wichartz sent the following: JT>> Go to check and see what version of BayesIT you have, I will guess that it is JT>> something other than 0.4. That is what I found out, once I deleted out the JT>> BayesIT that was installed with the program and put 0.4 in things seem

Re[2]: SPAM Filtering Problems

> On Wednesday, May 19, 2004, 9:07:05 AM, you wrote: > Brien King wrote: >> TBUDL, >> >> >> I'm using The Bat! Version 2.10.03 >> under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 >> >> >> The Spam Filtering does not appear to be working on >> TheBat! >> >> It is not catching ANY SPAM at all

Re[2]: Spam reporting

Saturday, December 13, 2003, 10:12:38 AM, you wrote: >> I've never gotten any legitimate mail from China, South America or >> Spain, TF> Are you sure? When I still lived in Taiwan, a user on this list TF> filtered all messages with a .tw top level domain and never saw my TF> postings. This list

Re[2]: Spam reporting

Saturday, December 13, 2003, 10:02:37 AM, you wrote: >> You got it .. the next time I'm in town! TF> You are aware that by "in town" you mean Bangkok, right? Just TF> checking... ;-) Any time I'm in town ;-) Lynn -- TheBat 1.62r Win2kPro SP2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] * * *Aun Aprendo I'

Re[2]: Spam reporting

Saturday, December 13, 2003, 4:28:28 AM, you wrote: PC> you can use the full headers-by hitting F9 to view them separately, or PC> CTRL-SHIFT-K to change to full-header view. once viewing full headers, PC> just forward the message. to send the message to the correct ISPs and PC> admins, it is muc

Re[2]: Spam reporting

Friday, December 12, 2003, 11:59:55 PM, you wrote: >> I know there's a switch that will let me attach an email >> with full headers so I can send it, say, to an isp to let >> him know one of his members is generating spam. TF> MIME-attach the message. TF> You can do that by clicking on Specials

Re[2]: Spam reporting

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Ken, On Fri, 12 Dec 2003, at 20:36:41 [GMT -0800] (which was 13/12/2003 (D/M/Y) 5:36 where I live) you wrote: KS> Only two things work - the less effective one is using spam software KS> to filter your mail and then delete the spam a

Re[2]: Spam reporting

Friday, December 12, 2003, 8:36:41 PM, you wrote: KS> I should caution you that the "From:" header is almost never the KS> person who is sending the spam. [snip details] Actually I know most of that, but I just opened a new email account and the first mails I got were spams from yahoo addresse

Re[2]: spam rule for more accounts

Hello Tony, Monday, November 3, 2003, 11:04:41 AM, you wrote: TB> Hello Tony, TB> A reminder of what Tony Boom typed on: TB> 03 November 2003 at 17:14:25 GMT + TB>> I used to use this method and did have a couple of rather comprehensive TB>> lists I used to filter on. They must be in a

Re[2]: spam rule for more accounts

Monday, November 03, 2003, Marck D Pearlstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi Lex, > @3-Nov-2003, 16:30 Lex Thoonen [LT] in > mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: MDP>>> Yes, he's talking about Selective Download filters. They can MDP>>> be driven by filed lists of trigger words/addresses. A lot

Re[2]: spam rule for more accounts

Monday, November 03, 2003, Tony Boom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: TB>> I used to use this method and did have a couple of rather comprehensive TB>> lists I used to filter on. They must be in a 2 or 3 year old backup on a TB>> CD somewhere but I wouldn't know where to start to look. > I found them

Re[2]: spam rule for more accounts

Hello Lex & other TB! list members following this thread, On Monday, November 3, 2003, Lex wrote: LT> Douglas, thanks a lot, I now got it completely, exactly what I wanted! One thing I forgot to include. You don't have to download spam to add it to your spam string file. You can copy that info

Re[2]: Spam

Hello Thomas, Friday, September 5, 2003, 12:04:17 AM, you wrote: TF> Hello Paul, TF> On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 15:18:08 +1000 GMT (04/09/2003, 12:18 +0700 GMT), TF> Paul Berger wrote: >> I am receiving allot of spam. When the messages arrive which I do not >> want I have set up filters to deal with th

Re[2]: Spam

Hello, Peter: Thursday, September 4, 2003, 10:20:21 AM, you wrote: It's almost as if the anger that should be reserved for the spammers is vented on those who fight back. Like the developers of this software. PF> Not disrespect, but more like "I don't mind giving you extra work so PF> that I m

Re[2]: Spam

Hello, Allie, and all: Thursday, September 4, 2003, 9:11:33 AM, you wrote: AM> David R. Austen, [DRA] wrote: DRA>> Naturally that challenge message needs to be very diplomatic. DRA>> Nobody has ever eventually mentioned to me that they found that DRA>> offensive. And they receive it only once, a

Re[2]: Spam

Hi, > Can the Bat! deal with this kind of Spam or is it necessary to get > another programme to do this work. The latter is the case - I'm quite happy with K9, http://keir.net/k9.html. It's very easy to use, and after a short while you get used to starting it before you start The Bat!. It's a goo

Re[2]: Spam

Hello, Peter: (snip) I appreciate your thoughts everybody, yet, this really is becoming a tempest in a teacup. And it seems that nobody here has had any experience with this system (CM) that is being critiqued with so much gusto. PF>I know it is - but why should _I_ - e.g. when helping another P

Re[2]: Spam

Hello, Allie: Thursday, September 4, 2003, 8:33:09 AM, you wrote: (snip) AM> I've been annoyed by this sort of system. I expect some people are. On the other hand, I pre-configure permissions for those whom I have **invited** to contact me. Say we exchange business cards in certain situations. T

Re[2]: Spam

Hello, Peter: Thursday, September 4, 2003, 8:37:20 AM, you wrote: PF> David, PF> On 04-09-2003 14:29, you [D] wrote in PF> : D>> CM asks those senders with a friendly message (that I myself have D>> written) to state their business. Less than 1% of spammers ever do. D>> I

Re[2]: Spam

Hello Mailing List, I am receiving allot of spam. When the messages arrive which I do not want I have set up filters to deal with them. All that happens is that the senders just change their names of some other element of the address and then the messages continue to get past my filters. Can the B

Re[2]: Spam plugin download location ?

Bonjour Prezes, Le mercredi 3 septembre 2003 à 15:54:34, vous écriviez : P> Hello thebat, P> Wednesday, September 3, 2003, 2:12:12 PM, you wrote: tdc>> Hi everyone, tdc>> I'm just wondering where I could find a spam plugin for my newly upgraded tdc>> TheBat 2.0. tdc>> Can anyone tell me? P> He

Re[2]: Spam

Hello, Granville: I have used ChoiceMail for some months now. I'm quite happy with it. www.digiportal.com About $40.00 USD and worth every penny. (snip) >Can the Bat! deal with this kind of Spam or is it necessary to get >another programme to do this work. Best regards, David

Re[2]: Spam

On Wednesday, September 03, 2003 8:21 PM, you wrote: GC> Can the Bat! deal with this kind of Spam or is it GC> necessary to get another programme to do this work. Many options are now available. I use POPFile http://popfile.sourceforge.net/ Dave Kennedy ___

Re[2]: Spam plugin download location ?

Hi Prezes, Thanks for the link. Wednesday, September 3, 2003, 8:54:34 AM, you wrote: P> Here is TBP Antispam plugin BayesIt 0.4c P> http://klirik.narod.ru/arc/bayesit04c.zip (112kb) OK, I've searched to no avail. I have sorted my spam, and run the learning engine. And I have added the baes.tbp

Re[2]: Spam plugin download location ?

Thanks a lot, I'll try this asap :) tdc>> I'm just wondering where I could find a spam plugin for my newly upgraded tdc>> TheBat 2.0. tdc>> Can anyone tell me? > Here is TBP Antispam plugin BayesIt 0.4c > http://klirik.narod.ru/arc/bayesit04c.zip (112kb) __

Re[2]: **SPAM** Re: SpamCop Filter Questions

Hello Peter, Friday, February 21, 2003, 7:31:19 PM, you wrote: FN>> Since I'm using Spampal, all Spam is refused. Your mail is recognised FN>> as spam. PM> Now your "spam protection" has turned to the opposite: you're spamming PM> all TBUDL members... :-( I'm sure it wasn't intended, so check yo

Re[2]: **SPAM** Re: PC-cillin vs the Bat

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Frank, On Friday, February 21, 2003 at 20:02 GMT +0100, Frank Nijkamp [FN] wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : FN> Since I'm using Spampal, all Spam is refused. Wonderful, I think now is a good time to refer to the manual. :) - -- Kevin Coates Dewi

Re[2]: **SPAM** Re[2]: Macros and MAPI

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Friday, February 21, 2003 5:37:31 PM RE: "**SPAM** Re[2]: Macros and MAPI" Greetings Frank, On Friday, February 21, 2003, 2:04:02 PM, you wrote: FN> Since I'm using Spampal, all Spam is refused. Your mail is recognised FN> as spam. If this is not th

Re[2]: **SPAM** Re: Plug-in/Feature Request to allow one to definea plugin to do something on a message or group of messages

Hello Thomas Fernandez, On or about Friday, February 21, 2003 at 02:52:02GMT +0700 (which was 2:52 PM in the tropics where I live) Thomas Fernandez posted: TF> Come again? How can that misconfigured spampal reply have triggered a TF> filter to send the message to 11,000+ people? My CNET virus ne

Re[2]: Spam - whitelisting domains?

Miguel A. Urech <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said on Friday, October 25, 2002, 12:38:36 PM > Hello Mitch, >> Currently, I have rule set up for whitelisted domains that requires >> me to cut-and-paste the domain from the e-mail message, and add it to >> the alternate filter strings lists. I'd like a simpl

Re: Re[2]: Spam filters

On Saturday 03 August 2002 11:32 pm, Headless wrote: > Saturday, August 03, 2002, 21:24, you wrote: > > For starters, why don't you take a look @ FAQ. > > I tried the faq link prior to posting, it told me to use IE, I then > left. > I agree IE is not an option. -- -~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-

Re[2]: Spam filters

Saturday, August 03, 2002, 21:24, you wrote: > For starters, why don't you take a look @ FAQ. I tried the faq link prior to posting, it told me to use IE, I then left. Headless Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.c

Re[2]: Spam filters

Saturday, August 3, 2002, 6:12:14 PM, Arjan wrote: > Here is a really good one: Kill all e-mail originating from these > domains: > .+aol\.com > .+@yahoo.+ > .+@msn\.com > .+@.*mail.* > .+@excite.+ > .+@[0-9]+\. I am going to butt in here and ask a question. I am not sure how all the wildcards

Re[2]: SPAM filter with The Bat (Mailwasher program)

Hi Marck, Your SpamCop filters work great now. I've reported 32 spammers so far in just two days (should I be glad or sad? :) I haven't had any responses from ISP's yet. From what I understand, SpamCop will forward those to me. I was thinking that maybe I should use the comment field in the rep

Re[2]: SPAM filter with The Bat (Mailwasher program)

Hi Peter, PP> Is there a small chance you have turned 'NumLock' off and don't keep PP> '' pressed while trying to enter the character codes?. I am keeping Alt pressed down, but you're right about Numlock - it is off (as it should be!! :-) When I turn Numlock on, Alt-nnn and Alt- works fine.

Re[2]: SPAM filter with The Bat (Mailwasher program)

Hi Marck, MDP> Nope. You done good! The "How to" says to use Ctrl-V. Actually, I just MDP> tried it and it's completely hit and miss! Matthias' hint about the broken lines on the website was right on target - I've got the filters working now. However, I had to make a small change to the second

Re[2]: SPAM filter with The Bat (Mailwasher program)

Hi Matthias, MA> Ehm. Someone else already mentioned (maybe on the german mailing MA> lists) that this problems are caused by some unwanted linebreaks on MA> the faq page. Oops - that makes sense. I don't know why I didn't notice! I'll try again without the linebreaks and see how I fare.. Your

Re[2]: SPAM filter with The Bat (Mailwasher program)

Hi Marck, MDP> Perhaps there's a bug in the filter paste function? Or I have missed something, so don't redo the filters just yet.. I couldn't find a Paste button or anything like it in the Sorting Office, so I simply pressed Ctrl-V. Have I been stupid again? O :-) Best regards, -Daan- _

Re[2]: SPAM filter with The Bat (Mailwasher program)

Hi Marck, MDP> I always report to SpamCop (there are some nice filters for doing MDP> this published on the FAQ) The second stage filter doesn't work right for me either.. it finds the incoming confirmation from Spamcop, then exports the whole message to "spamcop.bat" and tries to execute it! :)

Re[2]: SPAM filter with The Bat (Mailwasher program)

Hi Marck, > All such bounce messages do, no matter how well intentioned or formed, > is inform the spammer that the message got through. Oh boy.. Thanks for the enlightenment!! :) I'm now trying those Spamcop filters from the TB FAQ, but I'm not sure if they work as intended. Here's what I

Re[2]: spam on the rise

Sunday, February 24, 2002 at 10:50 PM Yuki, I follow the same guidelines but some silly people send stupid email postcards and bingo! You're on a list that get sold and then some. > BTW, what does the 'ads' in your e-mail address stand for, Shoebuddy? It means I expect to get ads from this

Re[2]: Spam filters

Jan, On Mon, 11 Feb 2002, at 08:43:11 [GMT -0500] (which was 7:13 PM where I live) you wrote: JR> As I understand it, deleting msgs on the server slows JR> down the retrieve process as TB! has to search thru JR> all msgs on server before beginning a download. Also after 'Andrew' mentioned

Re[2]: Spam

Hello Gerard, 13. januar 2002, 22:51:10, you wrote: GdV>How would that prevent spam and what would you put in for 'mailer'? I'm trying to tell, that I get SPAM, which has headers, which look like this: Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from planja.a

Re[2]: Spam

Hello David, 13. januar 2002, 14:43:19, you wrote: DvZ> String Location Presence DvZ> X-MailerKludges No Yes, but I use this: StringLocation Presence X-Mailer: mailer KludgesYes -- Jernej Simoncic, [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www2.arnes.si/~s

Re[2]: Spam

Hello David, 13 Jan 2002, 8:43:19 am, you wrote: DvZ> ... GD>> How exactly would you set up the SPAM filter to move a message that does GD>> NOT have an X-Mailer line in the header to a SPAM filter? I see no otpion GD>> to select X-Mailer in the "Location" pull down for the filter GD>> setup.

Re[2]: Spam

Hello Jernej, 13 Jan 2002, 4:41:38 am, you wrote: JS> So far all the SPAM I received contained a number of spaces in the JS> subject, and some had the X-Mailer: header set to mailer . So far JS> there were no false positives and no misses. How exactly would you set up the SPAM filter to move a

Re[2]: SPAM from a Bat User

Hello Nills, NHml> Hello Gerry, hi list, NHml> On Sunday, January 13, 2002 'Gerry Doyon' wrote: >> You know, it really stinks to see that I got SPAM that was sent via a >> registered Business user of The Bat! :- >> Windows 98 version 4 : 10 (Built to bleed) >> The Bat! 1.54 Beta/24 NHml>

Re[2]: Spam filter strings?

Monday, August 28, 2000, 12:54:10 PM, you wrote: >>> For a simple OR function, would we have: >>> '[str A]|[str B]' I've backed off from using the | for now, and have a more basic question. Let me give a specific example. I have a rule that has two strings in two sets in the Alternatives secti

Re[2]: Spam filter strings?

Now that we've established that it is possible to have complex conditions in rules, it would be helpful to me to see exactly how it is implemented in TB, with all the necessary extra characters in just the right places. Sometimes a few good examples are worth a lot of words and emails :-). This

Re[2]: Spam filter strings?

Sunday, August 27, 2000, 6:50:08 AM, you wrote: z>> Perhaps I was confused by reading help. I thought adding another set z>> implied an AND function, as per the example in help. I note that there z>> are two places to put in multiple strings, though. Is the z>> 'Alternatives' section an implied

Re[2]: Spam filter strings?

Saturday, August 26, 2000, 8:45:44 PM, you wrote: JA> I think your filter string is probably to blame here. I find using JA> the pipe symbol for OR is ambiguous. Are you suggesting that it does not work as an OR, or is there something wrong with the string I was using? JA> Try the followin

Re[2]: Spam filter strings?

Saturday, August 26, 2000, 5:14:46 PM, you wrote: MDP> 1) Set up a filter which specifies a match string of '[X-SBClass: MDP> Blocked]|[X-SBClass: Spam]|[X-SBClass: Bulk]' location "Kludges" MDP> presence "Yes". Thanks for the tip. I set it up as you suggested. Here's a copy of the string right

Re[2]: [spam score 3.48/10.0 -pobox] Re[2]: FETCH - Could Not Create Output File - Update

Hello Keith Russell, >> Maybe even a temp directory being corrupted/filled up. C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM\fix_pnp.exe C:\WINDOWS\COMMAND\deltree /y c:\windows\temp\*.* >nul C:\WINDOWS\COMMAND\deltree /y c:\temp\*.* >nul C:\WINDOWS\COMMAND\deltree /y d:\temp\*.* >nul C:\WINDOWS\COMMAND\deltree /y e:\temp\*

Re[2]: SPAM

Hello Andrew, Thursday, Thursday, October 14, 1999, you wrote: Andrew K. Lovetski> Hello, The Bat Users! >> It says delete from server, does that mean before or after >> downloading it OR is it smart enough to filter on the header and >> kill / delete it before wasting my time getting it