Hello Alto,
See my notes, interspersed, below
Friday, March 28, 2008, 5:55:27 PM, you wrote:
SA>> As a long time user of The Bat, I have never found it necessary to
SA>> upgrade. However, I no longer have tolerance for ver. 1.62r's lack of
SA>> formatting functionality, and would also like to h
Guten Morgen,
>> Are you using IMAP? If so, you should be aware that IMAP doesn't
>> work in v4.
DAC> I don't think it did in version 1 [...]
Yes, you're right of course.
DAC> but I it is aburd to say it doesn't work in 4.
It's rather absurd that it took three major versions to _not_ get it
w
Hi Thomas,
On Sunday, April 17, 2005 at 3:01:49 PM you wrote:
M>> She downloaded version 2.12 on purpose
TF> Aha. Why, if I may ask?
Because that's the version I use. We have to be able to see the same
screens when problems arise. She is not a very experienced computer
user and so steps which
Hi Thomas,
On Sunday, April 17, 2005 at 2:17:15 PM you wrote:
M>> I know upgrading has been discussed on this list bajillions of times,
M>> but do you know of a place where step-by-step instructions on
M>> upgrading can be found?
TF> Here:
TF> 1.) Download the latest release version.
Good inst
Hi Chris,
On Thursday, April 14, 2005 at 8:49:58 AM you wrote:
C> She may get a 10-day extension. Failing that, the computer clock can
C> be set backwards.
I never thought to do that. :)
I know upgrading has been discussed on this list bajillions of times,
but do you know of a place where st
Hi Chris,
On Thursday, April 14, 2005 at 8:49:58 AM you wrote:
>> My friend's son tried to upgrade her v1.62 to v3.
>> The instructions: "To finish the registration, click on "Help|Enter
>> Registration Code" and use the following information:" (numbers).
>> Use how? The Bat! (Cifnet) sends by e
Hello Mary,
MB> However, YMMV. And while it's easy to roll back The Bat! if one wants
MB> an earlier version, the ways of Microsoft are beyond understanding and
MB> I doubt that one could uninstall SP2 without a great deal more
MB> technical knowledge than I have, myself. :)
Its very simple to
Hello MAU and Mary and others who helped,
On Friday, September 3, 2004, 5:39 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MB> Hello MAU!
MB> On Friday, September 03, 2004, 12:46 PM, you wrote:
MB>>> I don't know whether an install of v. 2.12.00 over v. 3.0 would
MB>>> work.
M>> Yes, it will.
MB> Oh, what good
Hello Mary,
Friday, September 3, 2004, 1:14:44 PM, you wrote:
MB> Hello MAU!
MB> On Friday, September 03, 2004, 12:46 PM, you wrote:
MB>>> I don't know whether an install of v. 2.12.00 over v. 3.0 would
MB>>> work.
M>> Yes, it will.
I actually went back to 2.12 and then forward again to 3.0.
Hello Mary,
Friday, September 3, 2004, 2:10:11 AM, you wrote:
MB> Hello Barry!
MB> On Thursday, September 02, 2004, 7:59 PM, you wrote:
BJ ve not yet recieved my new key but i'll follow your advice thanks.
MB>>> From what site did you purchase v. 3.0? Chicago has been late with
MB>>> some
Hi Mary and everyone,
On Thursday, September 2, 2004, 12:10 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MB> On Thursday, September 02, 2004, 7:18 PM, you wrote:
BJ>> Is it best to do a fresh install of version 3.. then apply my
BJ>> backup
MB> RITLabs strongly advises on its website to install right over the
M
Hello Mary,
Friday, September 3, 2004, 1:52:57 AM, you wrote:
MB> Hello Barry!
MB> On Thursday, September 02, 2004, 7:48 PM, you wrote:
BJ>> ve not yet recieved my new key but i'll follow your advice thanks.
MB> From what site did you purchase v. 3.0? Chicago has been late with
MB> some keys.
Hello Mary,
Friday, September 3, 2004, 1:40:58 AM, you wrote:
MB> Hello Barry!
MB> On Thursday, September 02, 2004, 7:18 PM, you wrote:
BJ>> Is it best to do a fresh install of version 3.. then apply my
BJ>> backup
MB> RITLabs strongly advises on its website to install right over the
MB> previ
Hello Jonathan.
JA> The beta folder structure is different to the stable release. This was
JA> mentioned in the release notes for the betas, and I believe it was
JA> mentioned that you might not be able to go back to the stable
JA> versions.
Is the folder strcuture only changed for beta's I m
Wednesday, December 11, 2002, 1:36:32 PM, Simon wrote:
Just a quick question,
where did you get your certificate from ?
-Subhi
Blake> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Blake> Hash: SHA1
Blake> 'Lo Peter,
Blake> On Wed, 11 Dec 2002 14:26:32 +0100 your time, you said:
Plain Text Viewer
Hi Peter:
On Wednesday, December 11, 2002 at 7:26 am, Peter Meyns wrote:
> Yes, it is. You can set it in Options -- Preferences -- Viewer.
Very cool! Thanks.
Best regards,
Michael S. Hyatt
Using The Bat! Version 1.62 Christmas Edition on Windows XP
_
Hi Marck:
On Wednesday, December 11, 2002 at 3:50 am, Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
> Plain Text Viewer / Rick Text Viewer.
Is this a setting within TB? If so, how do I change it?
Best regards,
Michael S. Hyatt
Using The Bat! Version 1.62 Christmas Edition on Windows XP
___
Hello Tim,
Tuesday, December 10, 2002, 7:27:50 PM, you wrote:
TM> Yep, just remember to shut down TB, and back it up before doing the
TM> upgrade.
I was relieved I'd done that because, after upgrading to 1.62 and
moving from the first message I looked at to one in another folder,
all the message
Friday, December 6, 2002, 4:54:25 AM, you wrote:
> FWIW, I recently ran into all sorts of problems with that approach. In
> my case, I attempted to dual-boot NT4 and Windows 2000, installing
> Windows 2000 to drive D: with an existing NT4 installation on C:
> After installing Windows 2000, NT4
Hello David,
Friday, January 25, 2002, 6:39:49 PM, you wrote:
DvZ> You can
DvZ> select the part of the message and press F4 and TB! only quotes the
DvZ> select text! ;-)
Thanks, David - what a lot I'm learning from this list :-)
Using The Bat! v1.53bis on Windows 98
4.10 Build 1998
--
Be
Hello David,
Friday, January 25, 2002, 6:02:37 PM, you wrote:
DvZ> Hello myob,
DvZ> On Friday, January 25, 2002 at 17:48:50 +, myob [M] wrote
DvZ> concerning 'Upgrading to Secure Bat !':
DvZ> ...
DE>>> Have a look at http://www.ritlabs.com/securebat/
m>> Looking quickly at that, I couldn't
Hello David,
Thursday, January 24, 2002, 9:40:47 PM, you wrote:
DE> On 24 January 2002 at 21:55:05 +0100 (which was 20:55 where I live) Claude
DE> Renaud emanated these words of wisdom
CR>> I own a private license of the bat! I would like to know if it exists an
CR>> upgrade possibility to the
It was foretold that on 24-1-2002 @ 11:13:47 GMT+0800 (which was 4:13
where I live) Thomas F wrote and spread these wise comments on
"Upgrading":
TF> Yes, there are big differences, but a beta is a beta and not an
TF> upgrade.
Correct, but being almost 3 in the morning when i composed the
messag
Manfred,
ME> . . .
ME> Then copy then .reg files to the new system and import them.
ME> I would install the newest beta before doing this.
Thanks.
Be well,
Jerry Mundis
--
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.co
Michal,
MK> Now, very comfortable way is to install
MK> TB! 1.48beta11 with backup/restore/sync functions.
MK> Or if you like, wait for next official release with
MK> this new function.
Thanks. This may be the best way to go for me. I can find
the Halloween version at the R
Rob,
>> I can move everything in TB, including all my folders and filters, from
>> the old machine to the new, but I can't make TB run in anything but its
>> original prsistine congfiguration,
R> this is from a post by Marck Pearlstone in the TBOT . . .
R> . .
R> --
Friday, December 10, 1999
Hello Mark,
Thursday, Thursday, December 09, 1999, you wrote:
Mark> Hi Douglas,
Mark> Thursday, December 09, 1999, 7:50:09 AM, you wrote:
DH>> What's THEBAT.LNG? A Linux / Gnu version?
Mark> If only.no it's The Bat's language pack, which allows you to
Mark
Hi Alexander,
on Friday, December 10, 1999, 6:14:28 AM GMT+0800, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
AVK> The size of Intpack is due to the number of foreign languaages
AVK> currently supported, it's growth in size is therefore inevitable
AVK> too.
True; it's getting bigger than The Bat! itself. I un
Hello Mark,
Thursday, December 09, 1999, 3:21:19 AM, you wrote in response to my saying:
DH>> What's THEBAT.LNG? A Linux / Gnu version?
MA> If only.no
I'm told one's in the works.
MA> it's The Bat's language pack, which allows you to
MA> change the interface language.
Thanks. I use
Hello Ali & all fellow TBUDL members,
Thursday, December 09, 1999, Ali wrote in response to my saying:
>> I download and installed v. 1.38 (apparently not a beta) yesterday,
>> Dec. seventh from the ritlabs beta site. Was a revision uploaded on the
>> eighth or do I have the latest one?
AM> Th
Dear Christopher,
CJT> OK, testing done. It seems that qtp and fld aren't needed, but srt
CJT> needs to be there even if it is only a zero-byte file...
This is fixed in the today's revision of 1.38. Please feel free to
download it :-)
Sincerely,
Stefan
..."It is neither wealt
31 matches
Mail list logo
