Hello ztrader,
On Sat, 26 Aug 2000 20:27:56 -0700 GMT your local time,
which was Sunday, August 27, 2000, 10:27:56 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
ztrader wrote:
Saturday, August 26, 2000, 5:14:46 PM, you wrote:
MDP 1) Set up a filter which specifies a match string of '[X-SBClass:
MDP
Thanks for the examples of implementation. Actually, I was interested
in seeing the notation used in the strings placed in TB.
For a simple OR function, would we have:
'[str A]|[str B]'
is it OK to put spaces outside brackets as:
' [str A] | [str B] '
(I understand the ' chr is needed -
Hello ztrader,
On Monday, August 28, 2000 at 07:40:48 GMT -0700 (which was 7:40 AM
where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
For a simple OR function, would we have:
'[str A]|[str B]'
I think you may be getting confused here. You don't need the
apostrophes or the square brackets. Just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Januk,
On 28 August 2000 at 12:26:37 GMT -0700 (which was 20:26 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "Spam filter strings?":
For a simple OR function, would we have:
'[str A]|[str B]'
JA I
Monday, August 28, 2000, 12:54:10 PM, you wrote:
For a simple OR function, would we have:
'[str A]|[str B]'
I've backed off from using the | for now, and have a more basic
question.
Let me give a specific example. I have a rule that has two strings in
two sets in the Alternatives section.
Saturday, August 26, 2000, 8:45:44 PM, you wrote:
JA I think your filter string is probably to blame here. I find using
JA the pipe symbol for OR is ambiguous.
Are you suggesting that it does not work as an OR, or is there
something wrong with the string I was using?
JA Try the following:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi ztrader,
On 27 August 2000 at 06:32:01 GMT -0700 (which was 14:32 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "Spam filter strings?":
JA I think your filter string is probably to blame here.
Sunday, August 27, 2000, 6:50:08 AM, you wrote:
z Perhaps I was confused by reading help. I thought adding another set
z implied an AND function, as per the example in help. I note that there
z are two places to put in multiple strings, though. Is the
z 'Alternatives' section an implied OR for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi ztrader,
On 27 August 2000 at 07:44:08 GMT -0700 (which was 15:44 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "Spam filter strings?":
MDP Exactly.
z OK - got that :-). Might be worth a mention in the
Hallo ztrader,
On Sun, 27 Aug 2000 07:44:08 -0700 GMT (27/08/2000, 22:44 +0800 GMT),
ztrader wrote:
z OK - got that :-). Might be worth a mention in the help file.
Yep.
z Still a bit of fog here. Are you suggesting that I can make a
z construct like:
z (A or B or (C and D and (E or F)))?
No
Hallo Marck,
On Sun, 27 Aug 2000 16:01:49 +0100 GMT (27/08/2000, 23:01 +0800 GMT),
Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
MDP Well, 'A' is a simple test on the main filter page, 'B' is the first
MDP Alternative set while the second alternative set is far more complex
MDP containing three match strings
Hi ztrader Marck,
z Still a bit of fog here. Are you suggesting that I can make a
z construct like:
z (A or B or (C and D and (E or F)))?
Well, 'A' is a simple test on the main filter page, 'B' is the
first Alternative set while the second alternative set is far
more complex containing
Now that we've established that it is possible to have complex
conditions in rules, it would be helpful to me to see exactly how it
is implemented in TB, with all the necessary extra characters in just
the right places. Sometimes a few good examples are worth a lot of
words and emails :-).
This
Hello ztrader,
On Sunday, August 27, 2000 at 18:38:27 GMT -0700 (which was 6:38 PM
where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
Now that we've established that it is possible to have complex
conditions in rules, it would be helpful to me to see exactly how it
is implemented in TB, with all
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 27.08.00:
snip
If you really hate to use the '|' operator, or somehow '|' doesn't
work (it always works here, so I use it all the time), you may parse
the same condition to
I never got this '|' working properly. I tried everything what is described in the
I'm trying to set up some strings to filter spam. The actual filtering
will be done by a procmail receipe that will add header lines to allow
additional filtering by TB.
I'm a bit unsure of the exact syntax TB needs. An example string is:
[X-SBClass: Blocked | X-SBClass: Spam | X-SBClass: Bulk]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi ztrader,
On 27 August 2000 at 16:50:50 GMT -0700 (which was 00:50 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "Spam filter strings?":
z I'm a bit unsure of the exact syntax TB needs. An exampl
Saturday, August 26, 2000, 5:14:46 PM, you wrote:
MDP 1) Set up a filter which specifies a match string of '[X-SBClass:
MDP Blocked]|[X-SBClass: Spam]|[X-SBClass: Bulk]' location "Kludges"
MDP presence "Yes".
Thanks for the tip. I set it up as you suggested. Here's a copy of the
string right
Hello ztrader,
On Saturday, August 26, 2000 at 20:27:56 GMT -0700 (which was 8:27 PM
where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
Thanks for the tip. I set it up as you suggested. Here's a copy of the
string right out of the 'strings' box:
'[X-SBClass: Blocked]|[X-SBClass: Spam]|[X-SBClass:
19 matches
Mail list logo