On Thursday, March 29, 2001 at 17:28:21 +0100 Stuart Tares wrote:
> Any of the Microsoft mailers have an option to send an email out
> using RTF. This may even be the default.
H, this is new to me. OE was my emailer before switching to TB a
few months ago, and I never knew it sends "RTF" em
Hi,
On Thursday, March 29, 2001, 5:25:36 PM, Ming-Li wrote:
> What got me curious is what emailer would encode its mail as rtf.
Let me state for the record that Mail.app under NEXTSTEP used RTF for
formatting mail.
Regards,
Markus
--
Using The Bat! 1.52 Beta/1 under Windows NT 4.0 Build
1381
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, at 07:25:36 [GMT -0800] you wrote:
ML> What got me curious is what emailer would encode its mail as rtf. Or
ML> does it happen when one sends via MAPI from Word or other word
ML> processor?
Any of the Microsoft mailers have an o
On Wednesday, March 28, 2001 at 08:16:27 +0100 Jamie Dainton wrote:
> RTF does not have to be sent as an attatchment. It can can just be
> a message itself with it's encoding.
What got me curious is what emailer would encode its mail as rtf. Or
does it happen when one sends via MAPI from Word or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Thomas,
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001 12:23:52 +0800 GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, March 28, 2001, 5:23:52 AM (GMT+0100) (BST) my local time,
Thomas wrote:
s>> We have learned that Melissa virus has recently been
s>> spreading again and may
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Ming-Li,
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001 18:00:40 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, March 28, 2001, 3:00:40 AM (GMT+0100) (BST) my local time,
Ming-Li wrote:
>> No, they do not have to be an attachment. It can
>> actually be the message itse
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi daveiw,
On 28 March 2001 at 16:29:59 +0100 (which was 16:29 where I live)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote to Marck D. Pearlstone and made these points:
MDP>> As we all know, TB2 has been "somewhat delayed" which may
MDP>> have thrown a minor spanner in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Marck,
Tuesday, March 27, 2001, 5:47:33 PM, you wrote:
MDP> As we all know, TB2 has been "somewhat delayed" which may
MDP> have thrown a minor spanner in the works.
Please tell me, where can I find useful information on TB! 2?
- --
Best regards
Hello Thomas,
You <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When will we discard ASCII, ISO-8859-x, Big5, GB2312, etc, and only
> use UTF?
The day TB 2.0 comes out with full UTF8 support, I will :)
Cheers, SyP
--
Why do rhetorical questions exist?
--
Mi a
Hi syv,
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001 17:04:36 -0800GMT (28/03/2001, 09:04 +0800GMT),
syv wrote:
s> We have learned that Melissa virus has recently been
s> spreading again and may not be detected by any
s> antivirus software including Norton AntiVirus.
Use PC-Cillin (www.antivirus.com) and be uneffected
Hi Ming-Li and syv,
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001 18:00:40 -0800GMT (28/03/2001, 10:00 +0800GMT),
Ming-Li wrote:
>> No, they do not have to be an attachment. It can
>> actually be the message itself and Outlook Express will
>> recognize it as RTF and format it accordingly
>> Actually most of the time HTM
On Tuesday, March 27, 2001 at 17:11:50 -0800 syv wrote:
ML>> RTF files are attachments, aren't they?
> No, they do not have to be an attachment. It can
> actually be the message itself and Outlook Express will
> recognize it as RTF and format it accordingly
Again, I could be mistaken, but AFAIK
On Tuesday, March 27, 2001 , Ming-Li wrote the
following in regards to: [The Bat! and AVG Anti Virus]
.
ML> On Tuesday, March 27, 2001 at 13:02:47 -0800 syv wrote:
ML>>> I sometimes see this in newsgroups, and can't help but chuckle
ML>>> (unless th
On Tuesday, March 27, 2001 , ztrader wrote the
following in regards to: [The Bat! and AVG Anti Virus]
.
z> On Tuesday, March 27, 2001, 1:02:47 PM, syv wrote:
s>> Actually, you are mistaken. Viruses can be spread through RTF
s>> files. RTF files and documents are
On Tuesday, March 27, 2001 at 13:02:47 -0800 syv wrote:
ML>> I sometimes see this in newsgroups, and can't help but chuckle
ML>> (unless they have attachments). As I said, plain-text-only
ML>> messages are virus free by nature. As to attachments, I don't
ML>> know why one should trust the stateme
On Tuesday, March 27, 2001 at 22:25:57 +0200 Marek Mikus wrote:
> I'm in support mailinglist of this AV and as I remember, it should
> be an option to "not" certificate mail without attachment.
But how is the default setting? And does it know how to distinguish
plain-text messages from html ones
Hello all,
on Tue, 27 Mar 2001, at 13:27:23 local time (GMT -0800), ztrader wrote:
> How can this happen? AFAIK RTF does not have 'dangerous commands'
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/ms00-005.asp
--
Rob
using The Bat! 1.51
... I don't mind the rat race but I could do with
On Tuesday, March 27, 2001, 1:02:47 PM, syv wrote:
s> Actually, you are mistaken. Viruses can be spread through RTF
s> files. RTF files and documents are supposed to be ASCII only, and
s> there can be macro viruses.
How can this happen? AFAIK RTF does not have 'dangerous commands'. Is
this just
On Tuesday, March 27, 2001 , Ming-Li wrote the
following in regards to: [The Bat! and AVG Anti Virus]
.
>> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
>> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
>> Version: 6.0.219 / Virus Database: 103 - Release Dat
Hello all,
Tuesday, March 27, 2001, Ming-Li wrote:
>> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
>> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
>> Version: 6.0.219 / Virus Database: 103 - Release Date: 12/05/00
> I sometimes see this in newsgroups, and can't help but chuckle
> (unless
On Tuesday, March 27, 2001 at 10:23:29 -0600 Christian Dysthe wrote:
> does anyone know when AVG Anti Virus mail check functionality
> will support The Bat? AVG uses MAPI, but The Bat's MAPI
> implementation doesn't work with AVG. Eudora's and OE's do.
So you want AVG to check outgoing mai
Hey Marck,
Tuesday, March 27, 2001, 11:47:33 AM, you wrote:
MDP> The guys at AVG use TB in-house. I'm sure they'd be keen on it but
MDP> they may have been waiting for TB2 so that they could do it as a
MDP> plug-in. As we all know, TB2 has been "somewhat delayed" which may
MDP> have thrown a min
Hello all,
Tuesday, March 27, 2001, Christian Dysthe wrote:
> does anyone know when AVG Anti Virus mail check functionality will
> support The Bat? AVG uses MAPI, but The Bat's MAPI implementation
> doesn't work with AVG. Eudora's and OE's do.
> I remember a posting here letting me know
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Christian,
On 27 March 2001 at 10:23:29 -0600 (which was 17:23 where I live)
Christian Dysthe wrote to TBUDL and made these points:
CD> does anyone know when AVG Anti Virus mail check functionality will
CD> support The Bat? AVG uses MAPI, but The
Hello TBUDL,
does anyone know when AVG Anti Virus mail check functionality will
support The Bat? AVG uses MAPI, but The Bat's MAPI implementation
doesn't work with AVG. Eudora's and OE's do.
I remember a posting here letting me know that AVG is working on
this. Any info would be greatl
25 matches
Mail list logo
