-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Karin!
On Wednesday, June 20, 2001 at 3:48:53 PM you wrote:
> Uhm, I didn't speak against it. Actually, I love these
> quotes that match content. And my original question was
> mostly meant as entertainment for the list.
So we were all the ti
On 20-06-2001 at 11:59, Dierk Haasis kindly wrote:
> Hello andrew!
>> Can I just clarify. Do we like a tag that is related to the subject
>> of the mail? I would imagine it would be pretty useful. So we don't
>> have a problem?
> The original posting from Karin spoke against it - and on good
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001 07:38:50 -0400, Tim contributed this to our collective
wisdom:
...
TM> How does this work? I right click and pick "Insert Cookie" but don't
TM> get anything. Do I have to set where the "Cookies" are somewhere? As
TM> you can see
Hey Markus,
Wednesday, June 20, 2001, 6:24:22 AM, you wrote:
MG> To bring the discussion close to the Bat again: why don't mark the
MG> tag line and right-click and select "Insert Cookie" to have an
MG> alternative?
How does this work? I right click and pick "Insert Cookie" but don't
get anyth
Hi,
Dierk Haasis wrote:
> Whenever I stumble upon a tag line I consider to be too aggressive or
> misplaced in the context, I tend to either open a new message, delete
> the line or just plain apologize beforehand. until now it has only be
> a problem with a certain lady, or actually my percepti
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello andrew!
On Wednesday, June 20, 2001 at 11:36:18 AM you wrote:
> Can I just clarify. Do we like a tag that is related to the subject
> of the mail? I would imagine it would be pretty useful. So we don't
> have a problem?
The original posting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Peter!
On Wednesday, June 20, 2001 at 10:52:47 AM you wrote:
> Maybe not TB! is choosing the taglines regarding to the subject, but
> we're choosing our subject and texts regarding to the unnoticed
> influence of our taglines? *ggg*
As an out
Hi Peter,
Can I just clarify. Do we like a tag that is related to the subject
of the mail? I would imagine it would be pretty useful. So we don't
have a problem?
--
thanks,
andrewmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://at.omic.co.uk
--
_
Hello Dierk,
On Wednesday, June 20, 2001 at 10:39:09 AM you wrote (at least in part):
DH> Oh, I thought about that line and wrote it before I saw my random tag
DH> line ... Now, what does that mean?
sorry for jumping in *g* ... maybe it does mean you're influenced without
noticing. Maybe not TB
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Thomas!
On Wednesday, June 20, 2001 at 9:48:51 AM you wrote:
> I disagree. I don't need to try hard. And I don't think my perception
> is a problem. ;-)
Sounds as if we should marry ... each other ;-).
Oh, I thought about that line and wrote
Hi Dierk,
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001 09:17:44 +0200GMT (20/06/2001, 15:17 +0800GMT),
Dierk Haasis wrote:
>> and it still happens. Look below (not fixed)
DH> Since I can't actually see why RITLabs should put a very difficult
DH> semantical matcher into its code, I think it is pure coincidence
You do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello David!
On Wednesday, June 20, 2001 at 8:38:42 AM you wrote:
> I was finding that as well (from a file of 270,000) so I changed most of
> them to tribbles with just a few others , and it still happens. Look below
> (not fixed)
I don't want to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Karin
On 20 June 2001 at 01:53:44 +0200 (which was 00:53 where I live) Karin
Spaink wrote
> All too often I giggle because the - randomly appended - sig matches the
> subject matter all too closely, sometimes even too the point that I'd
> rather
Hi Karin,
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001 01:53:44 +0200GMT (20/06/2001, 07:53 +0800GMT),
Karin Spaink wrote:
KS> Randomly? Really? All too often I wonder. All too often I
KS> giggle because the - randomly appended - sig matches the
KS> subject matter all too closely,
I confirm this. (No, I don't use cooki
On 20-06-2001 at 02:15, andrew kindly wrote:
> Hi Karin,
KS>> And of course, *this* time TB chose an innocent one just to
KS>> disprove me. I am freaking out.
> 'even paranoids have enemies' ;-) Maybe it is all a conspiracy just
> to drive you insane
I simply replied to you, just for testin
Hi Karin,
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, at 01:53:44 [GMT +0200] (which was 00:53 in London) you wrote:
KS> And of course, *this* time TB chose an innocent one just to
KS> disprove me. I am freaking out.
'even paranoids have enemies' ;-) Maybe it is all a conspiracy just
to drive you insane
Someone
This has been bothering me for quite some time:
I have taken the time and effort to build quite a large
collection of quotes that I like and love, and most of the
short ones have by now found their way into my cookie file,
and are thus randomly appended under my mail.
Randomly? Really? All too o
17 matches
Mail list logo
