Hallo Jernej,
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 10:08:51 +0100GMT (13-12-2006, 10:08 +0200, where
I live), you wrote:
JS> Modern Linux distributions let you do as you please. For a typical home
Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
just to the person being replied to, even if t
On Wednesday, December 13, 2006, 0:55:22, Mica Mijatovic wrote:
> Yes, they do that too, and in various ways. Basically, the entire
> "administration" can be (and indeed is, by more advanced, "demanding",
> "weird" users) divided into much more specialized sectors, and perhaps
> best example is th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA224
***^\ ."_)~~
~( __ _"o Was another beautiful day, Tue, 12 Dec 2006,
@ @ at 15:09:59 +, when MFPA wrote:
>> This schema with three main partitions (OS | Programs |
>> Data/Documents) is the best/safest way. Many professionals f
Hello MFPA & everyone else,
on 12-Dez-2006 at 15:51 you (MFPA) wrote:
>> You need to do that whatever check for some of the downloads. The
>> check is done either with an ActiveX control in IE, or with a
>> stand-alone program when you're using other browsers. Always worked
>> for me.
> Does tha
Hi
On Friday 8 December 2006 at 2:49:10 PM, in
, Mica Mijatovic wrote:
> This schema with three main partitions (OS | Programs | Data/Documents)
> is the best/safest way. Many professionals find it as best solution too.
> Often is done further division of the Data as well (e.g. private,
> busines
Hi
On Wednesday 6 December 2006 at 6:54:16 PM, in
, Alexander S. Kunz
wrote:
> You need to do that whatever check for some of the
> downloads. The check is done either with an ActiveX control in IE, or
> with a stand-alone program when you're using other browsers. Always
> worked for me.
Does th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA224
***^\ ."_)~~
~( __ _"o Was another beautiful day, Fri, 8 Dec 2006,
@ @ at 17:56:29 -0600, when Douglas Hinds wrote:
>> This schema with three main partitions (OS | Programs |
>> Data/Documents) is the best/safest way. Many profess
Hello Mica,
>> However - Knoppix 5.5.1 is not there.
> Sorry for making you busy for nothing
It wasn't for nothing and didn't take long.
> and confused,
Confused? Never!
> it was my typo, and even twice. I espied it but was too late. So,
> the 5.0.1 is most recent version, 5.5.1 doesn't exis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA224
***^\ ."_)~~
~( __ _"o Was another beautiful day, Fri, 8 Dec 2006,
@ @ at 23:31:30 +, when Benedict Allen wrote:
> Howdy Mica,
> Friday, December 8, 2006, 2:49:10 PM, Mica wrotened:
>>> Knoppix runs from a CD. I have an olde
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA224
***^\ ."_)~~
~( __ _"o Was another beautiful day, Fri, 8 Dec 2006,
@ @ at 17:56:29 -0600, when Douglas Hinds wrote:
> However - Knoppix 5.5.1 is not there.
Sorry for making you busy for nothing and confused, it was my typo, and
e
Wednesday, December 6, 2006, Mary Bull wrote:
> But MSI won't allow me to drop back. I'd have to do a full uninstall
> plus reinstall to do that. And it's too much hassle.
MSI has an option to repair "if file is missing or a different version
is installed".
So it /might/ work.
Try going to Start
Hello Mica,
DH>> That's why I have my OS's and Applications in different partitions.
DH>> (Data too).
> This schema with three main partitions (OS | Programs | Data/Documents)
> is the best/safest way. Many professionals find it as best solution too.
> Often is done further division of the Data
Howdy Mica,
Friday, December 8, 2006, 2:49:10 PM, Mica wrotened:
>> Knoppix runs from a CD. I have an older version (3.6) of it.
MM> Knoppix also can be installed quite easily to hard disk as well (the
MM> easiest Linux installation actually, but is not very known, taking about
MM> 20 minutes an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA224
***^\ ."_)~~
~( __ _"o Was another beautiful day, Thu, 7 Dec 2006,
@ @ at 18:40:46 -0600, when Douglas Hinds wrote:
DH>>> B Gates could be the devil.
>> Well, the impulse to control/"rule" just everything and yet due to
>> greedi
MM>>> And when I tried a v. 3.85 MSI install, Windows told me it
MM>>> could not do that.
DH>> B Gates could be the devil.
> Well, the impulse to control/"rule" just everything and yet due to
> greediness is a demonic property, yes. Some call them "hungry spirits",
Insatiable and born and raise
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA224
***^\ ."_)~~
~( __ _"o Was another beautiful day, Wed, 6 Dec 2006,
@ @ at 15:28:33 -0600, when Douglas Hinds wrote:
>> And when I tried a v. 3.85 MSI install, Windows told me it could not
>> do that.
> B Gates could be the devil.
Hello Douglas!
On Wednesday, December 06, 2006, 3:28 PM, you wrote:
> ... substitute the old thebat.exe file with the new one. I recall
> that this used to work for most previous TB! uogrades, and there was
> also an ftp access with zip files on the ritlab site. ...
I could send you PM the beta
Hello Alexander,
Wednesday, December 6, 2006, 12:54:16 PM, you wrote:
> Well, I recently updated to FF2.0 - and realised then that I should have
> removed the old 1.5 installation before. I did that afterwards, and now
> half of the FF2.0 installation is a mess (I think I have to install 2.0
>
Hello Mary, Mica, Alex and anyone else following this thread.
>>> You could try to make a full backup from within TB, uninstall the
>>> program completely, and then reinstall from the new MSI (and then
>>> restore the backup) to cure the problem once and for all.
>> Unless the problem is with m
Hello Mica,
Wednesday, December 6, 2006, 10:38:52 AM, you wrote:
>> And Winrar still says the file is corrupt.
> Give up the Winrar, it can't deal with .msi files.
Maybe the latest version does.
>>> Then you'll see thebat.exe inside, so you can just drag and drop
>>> it where you wish.
>> You
Hello Mary Bull & everyone else,
on 06-Dez-2006 at 20:10 you (Mary Bull) wrote:
>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/290301
> What's your opinion of this warning at that website page:
Well, its there for a reason. :-)
MSI keeps a database of installed programs (well, those programs that
were ins
Hello Alexander!
On Wednesday, December 06, 2006, 10:28 AM, you wrote:
> the MSI cleanup utility from
> Microsoft. It can check the database of MSI installations and remove
> entries without actually uninstalling the program.
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/290301
What's your opinion of this
Hello Douglas Hinds & everyone else,
on 06-Dez-2006 at 18:06 you (Douglas Hinds) wrote:
>> Something may be corrupt with the MSI installation procedure. Early
>> MSI releases of TB had some problems if I remember correct.
> You mean TB!3?
Yes. I think v2 was not distributed in MSI packages.
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA224
***^\ ."_)~~
~( __ _"o Was another beautiful day, Wed, 6 Dec 2006,
@ @ at 11:06:04 -0600, when Douglas Hinds wrote:
> Is anyone using TB! with Linux?
It is significantly slower in Linux, still, and not quite proportional
in some
Hello Douglas!
On Wednesday, December 06, 2006, 11:06 AM, you wrote:
>>> I am using TB! Pro v. 3.51.10 on WinXP with no service packs and
>>> when I double click on the file thebat_pro_3-85-03.msi the
>>> computer enters a loop that requires me to reboot.
>> Something may be corrupt with the MSI
Hello Alexander et. al.,
Wednesday, December 6, 2006, 10:28:16 AM, you wrote:
>> I am using TB! Pro v. 3.51.10 on WinXP with no service packs and
>> when I double click on the file thebat_pro_3-85-03.msi the
>> computer enters a loop that requires me to reboot.
> Something may be corrupt with t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA224
***^\ ."_)~~
~( __ _"o Was another beautiful day, Wed, 6 Dec 2006,
@ @ at 09:00:52 -0600, when Douglas Hinds wrote:
>> If you use Total Commander, you can open .msi files using Commander's
>> plugin (msi.wcx).
> I also downloaded
Hello Douglas Hinds & everyone else,
on 06-Dez-2006 at 13:30 you (Douglas Hinds) wrote:
> I am using TB! Pro v. 3.51.10 on WinXP with no service packs and
> when I double click on the file thebat_pro_3-85-03.msi the computer
> enters a loop that requires me to reboot.
Something may be corrupt wi
Hi Mica,
Thanks for the tip.
Wednesday, December 6, 2006, I wrote:
>> I am using TB! Pro v. 3.51.10 on WinXP with no service packs and
>> when I double click on the file thebat_pro_3-85-03.msi the
>> computer enters a loop that requires me to reboot. Is another
>> type
ile thebat_pro_3-85-03.msi the computer enters
> a loop that requires me to reboot. Is another type of file for
> updating TB! available and if so, where? Previously (I've used TB°
> since v. 1.35), some updates were able to be realized by replacing the
> principle .exe file only.
I am using TB! Pro v. 3.51.10 on WinXP with no service packs and
when I double click on the file thebat_pro_3-85-03.msi the computer
enters a loop that requires me to reboot. Is another type of file
for updating TB! available and if so, where? Previously (I've used
TB° since v. 1.35),
31 matches
Mail list logo
