Hello Alexander V. Kiselev,
Responding to your article on Sunday, April 09, 2000 at 23:29:52 GMT
+0400 (which was 10/04/2000 2:29 GMT +0700 my Local Time) :
AVK BTW, this was written by me and tested on 1.41. After that I
AVK installed 1.42, and, to my surprise, 1.42 is indeed adding the
Hello Dieter and TBUDL fellows,
on Fri, 17 Mar 2000, at 17:24:57 sender's local time (timezone UTC+0100),
Dieter Hummel wrote:
I'll bet the Return-Path: in your example has been added by _your_
SMTP server, NOT by TB. The reason might be the will of your sysadmin
to ensure that the automated
Hi there!
On 8 Apr 00, at 18:05, Michael Heydekamp wrote
about "Re: Using Macros for header (%RETUR":
I'll bet the Return-Path: in your example has been added by _your_
SMTP server, NOT by TB. The reason might be the will of your sysadmin
to ensure that the automated replies (like
Hello Alexander,
I haven't been following this thread, so please forgive me if I missed
something.
I remember back when I first set up TBUDL using TB, and RITLabs was
hooking me up with a new binary just about every other day to correct
problems I had when setting up the list under TB. One
Hi there!
On 17 Mar 00, at 4:59, Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris wrote
about "Re: Using Macros for header (%RETUR":
AVK Note the _absence_ of the return-path: field. The latter field is added by the
AVK "transport system that deliveres message to the recipient", not by the
AVK originator
Hi there!
On 17 Mar 00, at 0:31, Michael Wieczorek wrote
about "Re: Using Macros for header (%RETUR":
Hello Alexander!
(A) if the reply-address (entered in "Edit User"-General) is different
from my send address respectivly my From-Address, TB set the
"Return-Path:" to the
Hello Listmembers,
On Fri, 17 Mar 2000 at 18:29:13 [GMT +0300] Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
I'll bet the Return-Path: in your example has been added by _your_
SMTP server, NOT by TB. The reason might be the will of your sysadmin
to ensure that the automated replies (like mailing lists
Hello Alexander!
On Fri, 17 Mar 2000 18:29:13 +0300 GMT, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
(at my local time: 17.03.2000, 16:29:13 +0100 GMT)
AVK On 17 Mar 00, at 0:31, Michael Wieczorek wrote
AVK about "Re: Using Macros for header (%RETUR":
(A) if the reply-address (entered in "Edit
Hello Dieter!
On Fri, 17 Mar 2000 17:24:57 +0100 GMT, Dieter Hummel wrote:
(at my local time: 17.03.2000, 17:24:57 +0100 GMT)
DH Hello Listmembers,
DH On Fri, 17 Mar 2000 at 18:29:13 [GMT +0300] Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
I'll bet the Return-Path: in your example has been added by
Hi there!
On 17 Mar 00, at 19:39, Michael Wieczorek wrote
about "Re: Using Macros for header (%RETUR":
(A) if the reply-address (entered in "Edit User"-General) is different
from my send address respectivly my From-Address, TB set the
"Return-Path:" to the reply-address resp.
Hello Alexander!
On Thu, 16 Mar 2000 01:06:42 +0300 GMT, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
(at my local time: 15.03.2000, 23:06:42 +0100 GMT)
AVK Hi there!
AVK On 15 Mar 00, at 22:17, Stefan Tanurkov wrote
AVK about "Re: Using Macros for header (%RETUR":
MW Using the macro
MW
Hello Alexander!
I'm insecure what I can say... :-)
(A) if the reply-address (entered in "Edit User"-General) is different
from my send address respectivly my From-Address, TB set the
"Return-Path:" to the reply-address resp. "Reply-To:"
Example:
---8-
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello!
Friday, March 17, 2000, 2:31, Michael Wieczorek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MW I'm insecure what I can say... :-)
Why you think you are insecure?
lost
MW On Thu, 16 Mar 2000 03:20:00 +0300 GMT, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
MW (at my local time: 16.03.2000, 01:20:00 +0100 GMT)
lost
AVK
Hello Michael,
MW Using the macro
MW %RETURNPATH=""%RETURNPATH="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" the
MW Return-Path in the header is setting to "Return-Path:
MW [EMAIL PROTECTED]", that is right. But if I save the
MW message (as draft for example), change the message and save it again,
MW "Return-Path" is
Hi there!
On 15 Mar 00, at 22:17, Stefan Tanurkov wrote
about "Re: Using Macros for header (%RETUR":
MW Using the macro
MW %RETURNPATH=""%RETURNPATH="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" the
MW Return-Path in the header is setting to "Return-Path:
MW [EMAIL PROTECTED]", that is right. But if I save the
Hello Alexander!
On Thu, 16 Mar 2000 01:06:42 +0300 GMT, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
(at my local time: 15.03.2000, 23:06:42 +0100 GMT)
AVK Hi there!
AVK On 15 Mar 00, at 22:17, Stefan Tanurkov wrote
AVK about "Re: Using Macros for header (%RETUR":
MW Using the macro
MW
Hello!
Thursday, March 16, 2000, 2:43, Michael Wieczorek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
lost
AVK ...and Stefan is right (as always;-)) here: you should *not* set
AVK the return-path yourself, on the user side you should limit
AVK yourself to altering the Reply-To: header... because return-path:
Hi there!
On 16 Mar 00, at 0:43, Michael Wieczorek wrote
about "Re: Using Macros for header (%RETUR":
AVK ...and Stefan is right (as always;-)) here: you should *not* set the
return-path
AVK yourself, on the user side you should limit yourself to altering the Reply-To:
AVK header...
Hello Bat'ler! ;-)
I have got a macro-problem:
Using the macro
%RETURNPATH=""%RETURNPATH="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" the
Return-Path in the header is setting to "Return-Path:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]", that is right. But if I save the
message (as draft for example), change the message and save it again,
Hi Michael,
On Tue, 14 Mar 2000 20:15:35 +0100GMT (15/03/2000, 03:15 +0800GMT),
Michael Wieczorek wrote:
MW Using the macro
MW %RETURNPATH=""%RETURNPATH="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" the
MW Return-Path in the header is setting to "Return-Path:
MW [EMAIL PROTECTED]", that is right. But if I save the
MW
20 matches
Mail list logo
