On Friday, January 24, 2014, 12:23:43 PM, you (tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com) wrote:
> Most of the setup file REGISTRY entries can be deleted as they are
> just leftovers from the install process. As for files, it likes to
> suggest uninstall files as being potentially dangerous. If you know
> what the
Friday, January 24, 2014, 5:34:31 AM, you wrote:
> Karla on Wednesday, January 22, 2014, 2:58:19 PM, you
> (tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com) wrote:
>> I changed that and will be closely monitoring the
>> mail account.Malwarebytes free software has solved any
>> invader-related issues
>I downloaded the free version and performed a quick scan. A whole bunch of
>items were "detected" Most of them have to do with the registry. Some are in
>files I recognize, e.g., set up file from software the I have installed, and I
>do not want to delete those.
Most of the setup file REGISTRY
Karla on Wednesday, January 22, 2014, 2:58:19 PM, you
(tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com) wrote:
> I changed that and will be closely monitoring the
> mail account.Malwarebytes free software has solved any
> invader-related issues I've had from time to time over the years, and
> I downlo
Karla, on Wednesday, January 22, 2014, 2:58:19 PM, you
(tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com) wrote:
> My default mode for finding any such issues is to run a Malwarebytes
> scan on the computer. One of the things I've noticed in The Bat! is
> that accessing AOL mail gives a message of an invalid certif
Wednesday, January 22, 2014, 11:15:54 AM, you wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 22, 2014, 7:42:48 AM, you (tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com)
> wrote:
>> What would you do if someone raided your living room while you were
>> upstairs sleeping?
>> Treat it the same way.
> If someone raided my living room
On Wednesday, January 22, 2014, 7:42:48 AM, you (tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com)
wrote:
> What would you do if someone raided your living room while you were
> upstairs sleeping?
> Treat it the same way.
If someone raided my living room, I would call the police, then get a
boom and clean up the mess
Hi,
> What can I do about it?
What would you do if someone raided your living room while you were
upstairs sleeping?
Treat it the same way.
--
Mit freundlichem Gruß
Alto Speckhardt
mailto:a...@treadstone79.de
Current version is 6.1.8 | 'Usi
On Tuesday, January 21, 2014, 6:22:06 PM, you (tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com) wrote:
> Gmail doesn't use self-signed certificates. You have an MITM attack
> going on there, as Jernej already said. I have no way to tell if it is
> malicious, or something "friendly" installed on your computer or
> networ
Hi
On Tuesday 21 January 2014 at 6:46:25 AM, in
, Leonard S. Berkowitz wrote:
> Here is the entires "set" for one connect interval:
> 1/20/2014, 22:32:00: FETCH - receiving mail messages
> 1/20/2014, 22:32:00: FETCH - Connecting to POP3 server
> pop.gmail.com on port 995 1/20/2014, 22:32:0
On Monday, January 20, 2014, 6:38:27 PM, you (tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com) wrote:
> After the line about "FETCH - Certificate S/N: 011E8403, algorithm:
> RSA (512 bits), issued from 10/5/2012 10:19:13 PM to 9/30/2032
> 10:19:13 PM, for 1 host(s): pop.gmail.com." do you see a line about
> "owner" o
Hi
On Sunday 19 January 2014 at 9:09:12 AM, in
, Leonard S. Berkowitz wrote:
> I do not have Avast, rather Avira. Would your comment
> still apply? Thanks.
It was just a suggestion, that the apparent MITM attack might be
nothing to worry about. Some anti-virus programs do it like Avast with
On Saturday, January 18, 2014, 12:39:53 PM, you (tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com)
wrote:
> Maybe it is something to do with your anti-virus, like the Avast! root
> certificate with no dates or serial number mentioned in my TLS
> handshake? (Avast! does a "man-in-the-middle attack" so that it can
> scan
On Saturday, January 18, 2014, 11:49:22 AM, you (tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com)
wrote:
> However, the certificate it's announcing doesn't look right -
> 512bit RSA is insecure (even 1024bit RSA has been phased out), and
> nobody issues end-entity certificates that are valid for more than 5
> years, so
On Saturday, January 18, 2014, 5:25:47 AM, you (tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com) wrote:
> You said it. This line is just one of the 'TLS handshake' lines logged when
> connecting to gmail servers. That is why it occurs every 3 minutes in
> your case.
Thanks.
--
Leonard S. Berkowitz
Using The Bat! v5
Hi
On Saturday 18 January 2014 at 4:49:22 PM, in
, Jernej Simoncic
wrote:
> On Friday, January 17, 2014, 23:10:24, Leonard S.
> Berkowitz wrote:
>> FETCH - Certificate S/N: 011E8403,
>> algorithm: RSA (512 bits),
>> issued from 10/5/2012 10:19:13 PM to 9/30/2032 10:19:13 PM,
>> for 1 host(s)
On Friday, January 17, 2014, 23:10:24, Leonard S. Berkowitz wrote:
> FETCH - Certificate S/N: 011E8403, algorithm: RSA (512 bits),
> issued from 10/5/2012 10:19:13 PM to 9/30/2032 10:19:13 PM, for 1 host(s):
> pop.gmail.com.
> It occurs repeatedly, every three minutes -- the frequency configured
Hello Leonard,
> FETCH - Certificate S/N: 011E8403, algorithm: RSA (512 bits), issued
> from 10/5/2012 10:19:13 PM to 9/30/2032 10:19:13 PM, for 1 host(s):
> pop.gmail.com.
>
> It occurs repeatedly, every three minutes -- the frequency configured
> for checking mail.
You said it. This line is ju
FETCH - Certificate S/N: 011E8403, algorithm: RSA (512 bits), issued from
10/5/2012 10:19:13 PM to 9/30/2032 10:19:13 PM, for 1 host(s): pop.gmail.com.
It occurs repeatedly, every three minutes -- the frequency configured
for checking mail.
And should I be concerned about it?
Thanks.
--
Leona
19 matches
Mail list logo
