Hi St,
Monday, March 10, 2003, 5:52:41 PM, you wrote:
SMN> You know this sound stooopeed, right? One pleasure I have over the other
SMN> free/buywares is my filter works just perfect with a very high accuracy,
SMN> and on the top: I have a personal feeling for a system I created myself!
Y
Hello St,
> Up to now it _took_ a lot of time to create good filters.
OK, I didn't how far you had already gone in creation the filter. So,
it doesn't take you much time but it _did_. That is what I meant, a
big effort.
> I have a personal feeling for a system I created myself!
Nothing to argue
Hello Spike,
> To quote the popular rent-a-car ad, "Not exactly." I have messages
> such as "ZDNet Anchordesk" and other assorted IT news and anti-virus
> bulletins that forward to a 'Smartgroups' list containing the 10,212
> members.
OK, understand.
> You tell me how the filter got bullocks'd
Hello Spike,
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003 at 13:12:24[GMT -0500](which was 18:12 where I
live) you wrote:
> As I am one of the group members (the 'owner'), I get each message
> back into the folder for the group. I still haven't figured out how
> the filter misfired after 14 months, as the trigger is the
Hello Miguel A. Urech,
On or about Monday, March 10, 2003 at 18:29:19GMT +0100 (which was
12:29 PM in the tropics where I live) Miguel A. Urech posted:
>> I had a situation occur over the weekend (when I am less attentive
>> to my mail) which caused a mail filter loop and sent out 457 'fwd:
>> fw
> WOW! It certainly must take a lot of time from you to manage the filters
Up to now it _took_ a lot of time to create good filters.
> Why re-invent the wheel! Haven't you thought about using something like
> POPFile for detecting spam?
> If I had to manage those filters I would delete them a
Hello Spike,
> I had a situation occur over the weekend (when I am less attentive
> to my mail) which caused a mail filter loop and sent out 457 'fwd:
> fwd: fwd: ' messages to a mailing list I manage. That is
> 457 X 10,212 (or 4.66 _MILLION_ plus) messages before I caught the
> error.
Hello St,
> As an example - some of my anti-spam rules has tons of keyword in
> them to be triggered on condition Yes for Anywhere:
:)
> The above is just _one_ of my filters...
WOW! It certainly must take a lot of time from you to manage the
filters (add words or phrases and knowing if they ar
> I had a situation occur over the weekend (when I am less attentive to
> my mail) which caused a mail filter loop and sent out 457 'fwd: fwd:
> fwd: ' messages to a mailing list I manage. That is 457 X
> 10,212 (or 4.66 _MILLION_ plus) messages before I caught the error.
> I still don'
Hello St - Musaic.Net,
On or about Monday, March 10, 2003 at 16:34:36GMT +0100 (which was
10:34 AM in the tropics where I live) St - Musaic.Net posted:
>> Can we please have the option to have *all* filter actions logged
>> rather than just those from incoming mail.
I fully concur with this! se
> Can we please have the option to have *all* filter actions logged
> rather than just those from incoming mail.
The log for "Office Rules" should mention _what_ condition (keyword
etc.) in a rule that triggered that particular rule.
As an example - some of my anti-spam rules has tons of ke
11 matches
Mail list logo
