Re: so is version 2 here yet .... :-)

Hello Deborah, On Wed, 3 Sep 2003 09:36:15 -0400 GMT (03/09/2003, 20:36 +0700 GMT), Deborah W wrote: > My personal favourite, though, is the one which says: "Plain fact is > there is nothing to equal OE. If only my OE would work" LOL! I love this. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen

Re: so is version 2 here yet .... :-)

On Wednesday, September 03, 2003, Bill Blinn Technology Editor wrote... > [..] techno-turnips [..] hahaha... I love that term. Very nice ;) -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) My mind is not for rent / To any god or government pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature _

Re: so is version 2 here yet .... :-)

On Wednesday, September 3, 2003, 9:45:05 AM, Bill Blinn Technology Editor wrote: BBTE> Just to clear things up, I did not write that. I quoted comments BBTE> from C|Net. I have no opinion one way or the other on the BBTE> application. Oh, I know you were quoting the cnet comments...I just found s

Re[4]: so is version 2 here yet .... :-)

It seems that Allen said ... A> Hmn . . . mywebattack's users seem to have a different opinion. A> http://www.webattack.com/get/foxmail.shtml A> I'm not a big fan of C|Net, these days, though . . . so I'm always A> looking for a second opinion . . . Second opinions are often helpful. I'll do

Re[3]: so is version 2 here yet .... :-)

Bill, BBTE> It seems that MAU said ... M>> Have you tried Foxmail (it's free) to compose/send your HTML e-mail? BBTE> Uh-oh. I have the occasional need to send HTML-coded mail, so I did a BBTE> search for "Foxmail". Found it on C|Net, along with some reviews like BBTE> this: BBTE> "This program

Re: so is version 2 here yet .... :-)

Hello Deborah, > Yes, that's what I've been using. I always thought you were smart :-) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v1.62i Current version is 2.00 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.co

Re: so is version 2 here yet .... :-)

Hello Bill, > Uh-oh. I have the occasional need to send HTML-coded mail, so I did a > search for "Foxmail". Found it on C|Net, along with some reviews like > this: If Foxmail sold for US$ 100 reviews would say it was too expensive for what it does. As it is FREE... you know what I mean :) > Th

Re[2]: so is version 2 here yet .... :-)

It seems that Deborah W said ... D> On Wednesday, September 3, 2003, 7:27:47 AM, Bill Blinn Technology Editor wrote: BBTE>> "This program will steal your passwords and people will be able to BBTE>> see all your personal information. I contacted the government to BBTE>> investigate this company I

Re: so is version 2 here yet .... :-)

On Wednesday, September 3, 2003, 7:27:47 AM, Bill Blinn Technology Editor wrote: BBTE> "This program will steal your passwords and people will be able to BBTE> see all your personal information. I contacted the government to BBTE> investigate this company I would stay clear of this by all means."

Re: so is version 2 here yet .... :-)

On Wednesday, September 3, 2003, 3:29:48 AM, MAU wrote: >> I was expecting the html editor to be useful, because I do >> occasionally want to send html mail, but tbh I'm disappointed with >> it. M> Have you tried Foxmail (it's free) to compose/send your HTML e-mail? Yes, that's what I've been us

Re[2]: so is version 2 here yet .... :-)

It seems that MAU said ... M> Have you tried Foxmail (it's free) to compose/send your HTML e-mail? Uh-oh. I have the occasional need to send HTML-coded mail, so I did a search for "Foxmail". Found it on C|Net, along with some reviews like this: "This program will steal your passwords and people

Re: so is version 2 here yet .... :-)

Hello Deborah, > I was expecting the html editor to be useful, because I do > occasionally want to send html mail, but tbh I'm disappointed with it. Have you tried Foxmail (it's free) to compose/send your HTML e-mail? > On the bright side, the installation, as you say, was a dream - fast & > sim

Re: so is version 2 here yet .... :-)

On Tuesday, 2 September 2003, at 9:13:04 p.m., Paul Richardson wrote: > Does this mean the Help file has been revised? This is a badly needed > improvement. Is it any good? Um. See topic "Anti Spam"... "Enter topic text here." So, there are still patches to worry about. As for the rest, I

Re: so is version 2 here yet .... :-)

On Monday, September 1, 2003, 8:33:44 PM, Avenarius wrote: A> After reading all the sceptical opinions about v2 betas on the TBBETA A> list, I doubted whether it would be necessary for me to upgrade. The A> big improvement in v2 is supposed to be full working IMAP, which I A> don't use. Same here

Re: so is version 2 here yet .... :-)

Tuesday, September 2, 2003, 7:54:22 PM, you wrote: M3>> Work continues on the Bayesian plug in. > Could you give me a pointer to where to get this plug-in? I tried to > google but everytime, I end up at programs like Spampal, K9, Popfile. The Bayesian plugin for TB! can be found at http://klirik

Re[4]: so is version 2 here yet .... :-)

Hello Robert, Tuesday, September 2, 2003, 3:29:45 AM, you wrote: RG> On Tuesday, September 2, 2003, 10:04:14 AM, FJ de Bruin wrote: FdB>> Can you (or someone else) confirm that Bayesian filtering made it into FdB>> the final 2.0 version? FdB>> I tried to look for this info on the ritlabs site bu

Re[4]: so is version 2 here yet .... :-)

Hello MikeD, Tuesday, September 2, 2003, 2:37:33 PM, you wrote: M3> Work continues on the Bayesian plug in. It is not "included", though. M3> You do have to go out and get it separately. Could you give me a pointer to where to get this plug-in? I tried to google but everytime, I end up at program

Re[4]: so is version 2 here yet .... :-)

<== Reply to your email of Tuesday, September 2, 2003, 10:37:33 PM ==> FdB>> Can you (or someone else) confirm that Bayesian filtering made it into FdB>> the final 2.0 version? > Work continues on the Bayesian plug in. It is not "included", though. > You do have to go out and get it separately

Re[3]: so is version 2 here yet .... :-)

Hello FJ, Tuesday, September 2, 2003, 2:04:14 AM, you wrote: FdB> Can you (or someone else) confirm that Bayesian filtering made it into FdB> the final 2.0 version? FdB> I tried to look for this info on the ritlabs site but I could not find FdB> any reference. Work continues on the Bayesian plu

Re: so is version 2 here yet .... :-)

Hello Avenarius, On Tue, 02 Sep 2003 02:33:44 +0200 GMT (02/09/2003, 07:33 +0700 GMT), Avenarius wrote: > However, the few hours that I've been using version 2 have convinced > me that v2 is worth paying the price for upgrade. There are lots of > cosmetic improvements and bug-fixes in version 2 c

Re[2]: so is version 2 here yet .... :-)

Hi Allister, Tuesday, September 2, 2003, 5:49:23 PM, you wrote: AJ> In order to use Anti spam support firstly you have to install AJ> anti-spam plug-in with self learning facilities. To install a plug-in, AJ> open Preferences dialog from the Options | Preferences menu and in the AJ> preferences t

Re[3]: so is version 2 here yet .... :-)

It seems that FJ de Bruin said ... F> Thanks for this information, guess I will have to be patient for the F> ritlabs site to come back online. It's back now. I gave the site my credit card information last night and this morning I'm fully registered. The 30-day-trial counter re-set itself to 30

Re[3]: so is version 2 here yet .... :-)

Hi FJ, Tuesday, September 2, 2003, 9:29:05 PM, you wrote: FdB> Thanks for this information, guess I will have to be patient for the FdB> ritlabs site to come back online. It is up and operational, I have just been there and downloaded v.2. Regards Robyn

Re[2]: so is version 2 here yet .... :-)

Hello Allister, Tuesday, September 2, 2003, 9:49:23 AM, you wrote: AJ> Having just taken the plunge and upgraded, I can give you the AJ> following text from the help topic "About Spam"... AJ> The Bat! offers an interface for installing self learning anti-spam AJ> plug-ins. How to install and use

Re: so is version 2 here yet .... :-)

Allister Jenks wrote: > Having just taken the plunge and upgraded, I can give you the > following text from the help topic "About Spam"... Does this mean the Help file has been revised? This is a badly needed improvement. Is it any good? -- Paul Richardson Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows 2000

Re: so is version 2 here yet .... :-)

Hello Joseph, > The file structure is different, and you would not be able to use the > 1.62 program with files that were adapted by the 2.0 program. Not totally correct for Pop accounts. The folder structure has changed. I have specifically asked this question to Stefan in the past with regard t

Re: so is version 2 here yet .... :-)

Hello Avenarius, > oenhanced Search, it seems (though I can't seem to be able to > find the 1.xx option to search in All Accounts or only in Current > Account) Right mouse click 'Select all' or 'Cntl+A'. -- Best regards, Greg Strong Using The Bat! v2.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Bu

Re: so is version 2 here yet .... :-)

On Tuesday, 2 September 2003, at 7:04:14 p.m., FJ de Bruin wrote: > Can you (or someone else) confirm that Bayesian filtering made it into > the final 2.0 version? Having just taken the plunge and upgraded, I can give you the following text from the help topic "About Spam"... The Bat! offers an

Re: so is version 2 here yet .... :-)

A Bat-fellow, Allister Jenks, wrote on Tuesday, 2nd September 2003 at 10:10:43 (GMT +1200), which was 0:10 a.m. in Bratislava -- AJ> 1) Is it ready for prime time? ie. stable? I have had no time to participate in Beta cycles after 1.61. However, when version 2.0 Final came out earlier this eveni

Re[2]: so is version 2 here yet .... :-)

On Monday, September 01, 2003, Deborah W wrote in : DW> If I download & install v2 & decide to go back to 1.62r, can I? Or DW> will I need to re-install 1.62 from scratch? Deborah, The file structure is different, and you would not be able to use the 1.62 program with f

Re[3]: so is version 2 here yet .... :-)

On Tuesday, September 2, 2003, 10:04:14 AM, FJ de Bruin wrote: FdB> Can you (or someone else) confirm that Bayesian filtering made it into FdB> the final 2.0 version? FdB> I tried to look for this info on the ritlabs site but I could not find FdB> any reference. Ritlabs gives a link to this inf

Re[2]: so is version 2 here yet .... :-)

Hello Avenarius, Tuesday, September 2, 2003, 2:33:44 AM, you wrote: A> However, the few hours that I've been using version 2 have convinced A> me that v2 is worth paying the price for upgrade. There are lots of A> cosmetic improvements and bug-fixes in version 2 compared to 1.61 that A> I wouldn't

Re: so is version 2 here yet .... :-)

Allister Jenks, [AJ] wrote: AJ> Excellent! However, some questions. AJ> 1) Is it ready for prime time? ie. stable? For prerelease software, this is unpredictable. Some of us may have problems while others don't. In fact, this remains the case even after release though the problems should be mu

Re: so is version 2 here yet .... :-)

On Tuesday, 2 September 2003, at 10:38:47 a.m., Deborah W wrote: > What is the price on v2? Student price? > Has there been any clarification on the eligibility for the 50% > price-break for current users? Go look at the registration page mentioned elsewhere in this thread! -- Regards, Allist

Re: so is version 2 here yet .... :-)

On Monday, September 1, 2003, 5:02:03 PM, Piet Bossuyt wrote: PB> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/the_bat/beta/the_bat.exe PB> It's in the beta dir, but it's the final. Questions: What is the price on v2? Student price? Has there been any clarification on the eligibility for the 50% price-brea

Re: so is version 2 here yet .... :-)

On Tuesday, 2 September 2003, at 9:43:12 a.m., Martin Webster wrote: > https://www.cifnet.com/cgi-bin/ritlabs/thebat.html?reg=dGltPTEwNjIyNjQ2OTg Excellent! However, some questions. 1) Is it ready for prime time? ie. stable? 2) If I install it, is my wife going to have trouble using it, after

Re: so is version 2 here yet .... :-)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello ArchY, Monday, September 1, 2003, 10:20:50 PM, you wrote: A> Yeah we need this new registration key, but how to obtain it ? https://www.cifnet.com/cgi-bin/ritlabs/thebat.html?reg=dGltPTEwNjIyNjQ2OTg M - -- Best regards, Martin Webster The B

Re[2]: so is version 2 here yet .... :-)

Bonjour Jernej, Le lundi 1 septembre 2003 ŕ 23:18:19, vous écriviez : JS> On Monday, September 1, 2003, 23:02:03, Piet Bossuyt wrote: >> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/the_bat/beta/the_bat.exe >> It's in the beta dir, but it's the final. JS> Note that you'll need a new registration code. Yea

Re: so is version 2 here yet .... :-)

On Monday, September 1, 2003, 23:02:03, Piet Bossuyt wrote: > http://www.ritlabs.com/download/the_bat/beta/the_bat.exe > It's in the beta dir, but it's the final. Note that you'll need a new registration code. -- Jernej Simoncic, [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www2.arnes.si/~sopjsimo/ http://deepthou

Re: so is version 2 here yet .... :-)

http://www.ritlabs.com/download/the_bat/beta/the_bat.exe It's in the beta dir, but it's the final. > Hello TBUDL, > Hey I'm just impatitent ;) > Anytime over the next couple of weeks will be fine... Current version is 1.62r | "Using TBUDL" info

so is version 2 here yet .... :-)

Hello TBUDL, Hey I'm just impatitent ;) Anytime over the next couple of weeks will be fine... -- kind regards, Sean _ Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 _