-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Neurowerx, [N] wrote:
N That depends. The References header may contain multiple
N references, the In-Reply-To header contains only the last
N reference.
N If you use threading by references in your inbox (while the mails you
N wrote are in your
17-Jun-2003 07:37, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The References can't contain ANY references - WL wrote that there was
no References included.
Correct. I was just explaining the difference.
As long as the message, with the MID equal to the MID in the I-R-T,
exists in the same folder, it will
ooh..look at me...I'm using folder templates :)
Anyways, I usually have my email sorted w/ threads.
Unfortunately, some webmail software doesn't use the
references header, so threads break. I can switch
back and forth between references and subject based
threading, but it would be nice if I
Hello all,
Monday, June 16, 2003, WL wrote:
ooh..look at me...I'm using folder templates :)
Anyways, I usually have my email sorted w/ threads.
Unfortunately, some webmail software doesn't use the
references header, so threads break. I can switch
back and forth between references and
On Mon 16-Jun-03 5:23pm -0400, WL wrote:
ooh..look at me...I'm using folder templates :)
Anyways, I usually have my email sorted w/ threads.
Unfortunately, some webmail software doesn't use the
references header, so threads break. I can switch
back and forth between references and
16-Jun-2003 23:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a similar vein, some sofware doesn't use references;
instead, they use In-reply-to. Can that be used for
threading?
I believe that's already handled.
That depends. The References header may contain multiple references, the
In-Reply-To header
On Tue 17-Jun-03 12:53am -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
16-Jun-2003 23:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon 16-Jun-03 5:23pm -0400, WL wrote:
In a similar vein, some sofware doesn't use references;
instead, they use In-reply-to. Can that be used for
threading?
I believe that's already
7 matches
Mail list logo
