-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Neurowerx, [N] wrote:
N> That depends. The "References" header may contain multiple N> references, the "In-Reply-To" header contains only the last N> reference. N> If you use threading by references in your inbox (while the mails you N> wrote are in your outbox), none of the replies you get will be N> threaded If I'm understanding what you're saying then this isn't true. N> (since the mail that is replied to is not in the same folder) TB! uses both the 'In-Reply-To' and 'References' headers for threading. The 'In-Reply-To' header is used to assist with threading one message directly with another in terms of one being a direct reply to another. If the In-Reply-To header doesn't match, then the 'References' header is used. I have folders where the reply messages aren't with the originals and the originals thread by themselves. N> if the mailer of "the other" doesn't set "References" header (which N> is quite logic to me and I don't see what TB! could do about it). If there is no 'References' header, then threading by references would be extremely fragile, in that as soon as you delete a message within the thread, the thread falls apart. This was an issue with the very early TB! versions and was fixed a long time ago by not only including the 'References' header, but also letting that header store up to, I think, the messageid's for the last 6 messages in the thread. - -- -= allie_M =- | List Moderator _ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP SDK 3.0.2 iQA/AwUBPu7svFfJ62ArBxfiEQILtACePYqmz533k0xl2wi3kUseEvE91t4AoJJs nJLpMR7pAoBCuU5UtDXM/6Lv =7+8+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.62r | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
