Hello Adam,
On Fri, 31 May 2002 20:04:13 -0230 GMT (01/06/02, 05:34 +0700 GMT),
Adam wrote:
TF Yes. I have such messages in a Common Folder. You can call this
TF folder Drafts or Templates, as you wish.
A How do you get messages in there?
Drag Drop. If it is a incoming message, then you just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Salutation Miguel
On 31 May 2002 at 22:59:45 +0200 (which was 21:59 where I live) Miguel A.
Urech graced us with these comments
Another one is a message parked in the Outbox, is a message that has been
completed but you don't want to send yet.
On Saturday, June 1, 2002, 12:34:39 AM, Adam wrote:
I tried clicking on that mid link. But nothing happened. Does
something happen for you?
By click, read double-click, at least on my PC. If TB cannot find the
message, it pops up a dialog asking where it should look, and if it
cannot then
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Oliver
On 31 May 2002 at 22:44:46 +0100 (which was 22:44 where I live) Oliver
Antosch rearranged electrons to get
I have read the rest of the thread so this is more for information
I use Proxy+
If it is the one from http://www.proxyplus.cz/
Hello tbudl,
I'm using the Bat! version 1.53t. I have no intentions of
downgrading to 1.60 until it becomes more stable and less buggy.
Anyway, I love the Bat!, but there's one thing that majorly annoys
me. Is there any possible way of removing the [#] after Re when
replying to a
On Saturday, June 1, 2002, 1:59:37 PM, Jack Murphy, III wrote:
I'm using the Bat! version 1.53t. I have no intentions of
downgrading to 1.60 until it becomes more stable and less buggy.
Anyway, I love the Bat!, but there's one thing that majorly annoys
me. Is there any possible way
I've got a .pst-file exported from Outlook which, among other things,
contains a lot of calender data.
Does anyone know a program I can use to read this data? I do not want
to install Outlook on my system.
--
Regards,
Marcus Ohlström
Using The Bat! v1.60i on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195
Hi Jack,
On Saturday, June 1, 2002 at 08:59:37 [GMT -0400], you wrote:
JMI I'm using the Bat! version 1.53t. I have no intentions of
JMI downgrading to 1.60 until it becomes more stable and less buggy.
From my personal experience I'd say that 1.60 is stable and doesn't have
so many serious
Hi Marcus,
MO Does anyone know a program I can use to read this data? I do not want
MO to install Outlook on my system.
PST files are unique to Outlook and require that program
to open them. They are extremely complex. The calendar info can be
exported (using Outlook) to VCF and comma delimted
Friday, May 31, 2002, 1:47:08 PM, you wrote:
JA On Friday, May 31, 2002, Roel wrote...
I'm behind a firewall/proxy as well, and all I have to do is fill in
the standard information: your proxy should forward these connections
without any further configuration necessary (if it is a
Hello Julian Beach (Lists),
On Saturday, June 01 2002 at 06:05 AM PDT, you wrote:
In version 1.60m, you need to go into account properties, templates,
reply, and uncheck Use Reply numbers in subject line. I don't know
if this is the same in 1.53t.
You are right... in earlier versions you
Hi Lynn,
On Sat, 1 Jun 2002 08:11:23 -0700, you wrote:
JA Depends on the software. Wingate sometimes screws things like that
JA up... But you are right... most semi-decent transparent proxies allow
JA you to just fill in the normal details of the server ;)
I'm using Wingate, and just have
Thomas-
Point well taken. But it still seems to me that the mid: link is
*only* useful in the TBUDL context, or in a similar situation where a
group of users has the same set of email archives to each other. If I
send you a mid: link to some other folder in my system it's useless to
you. And a
Hello Mark,
On Sat, 1 Jun 2002 09:34:04 -0700 GMT (01/06/02, 23:34 +0700 GMT),
Mark Wieder wrote:
MW Point well taken. But it still seems to me that the mid: link is
MW *only* useful in the TBUDL context, or in a similar situation where a
MW group of users has the same set of email archives to
Saturday, June 1, 2002, 9:48:36 AM, you wrote:
ACM It doesn't have to only work in a user list setting. If we've been
ACM exchanging mail privately and I wish to refer you to a message I sent
ACM to you 2 months ago, a mid: link could make life much easier for you
ACM where referring back to the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Mark Wieder [MW] wrote:
...
MW Point well taken. But it still seems to me that the mid: link is
MW *only* useful in the TBUDL context, or in a similar situation
MW where a group of users has the
Hello Jack!
On Saturday, June 1, 2002 at 2:59:37 PM you wrote:
I'm using the Bat! version 1.53t. I have no intentions of
downgrading to 1.60 until it becomes more stable and less buggy.
Actually 1.60 is more stable and less buggy than 1.53. Ever thought
about the version you use? It
Hello Pekka!
On Friday, May 31, 2002 at 10:02:18 PM you wrote:
Seems that %ACCOUNT and %FROM don't mix too well :-(
You are right. I am not quite sure if this behaviour can be changed by
RITLabs, since the %ACCOUNT macro - IMO - is conceptually superior (in
the sense of higher in the
Hello Lars!
On Friday, May 31, 2002 at 7:15:27 PM you wrote:
There is another alternative for the command line friends: :-)
http://www.rarlab.com/rar/unrarw32.exe offers a command line unRAR
program which can handle all versions of RAR compression.
One more: Squeez (current version) does
Hello Lars!
On Friday, May 31, 2002 at 7:18:57 PM you wrote:
This is the correct translation. If that's what you call 'extremely
poor', I don't want to know how good you are in the languages you speak
fluently! ;-)
It wasn't just a good translation but also the second good one showing
up.
Hello Dierk,
On Sat, 1 Jun 2002 10:17:25 +0200 GMT (01/06/02, 15:17 +0700 GMT),
Dierk Haasis wrote:
Seems that %ACCOUNT and %FROM don't mix too well :-(
DH You are right. I am not quite sure if this behaviour can be changed by
DH RITLabs, since the %ACCOUNT macro - IMO - is conceptually
Hi Dierk,
On Saturday, June 1, 2002 at 10:20:51 [GMT +0200], you wrote:
DH Hey, don't take the fun out of a good flame war between a man and
DH himself ...
ROFL! Sorry, I didn't want to spoil anyone's fun. My apologies to Thomas
for that. :-)
--
Regards,
Lars
The Bat! 1.60n on Windows XP 5.1
Hello Mark,
PMFJI.
On Sat, 1 Jun 2002 10:08:57 -0700 GMT (02/06/02, 00:08 +0700 GMT),
Mark Wieder wrote:
MW I don't regard email archives as particularly safe places to store
MW info I want to refer to later, especially with the random
MW corrupted messages bases I've run into occasionally.
This is one of those threads I haven't been tracking, but something
now pulled me in, and going back through what I still have on my
system, is a message with this text:
MW If I send you a mid: link to some other folder in my system it's
MW useless to you. And a waste of bandwidth,
The idea of
Hello Dierk,
On Sat, 1 Jun 2002 19:26:57 +0200GMT (1-6-02, 19:26 +0200GMT, where I
live), you wrote:
DH Actually 1.60 is more stable and less buggy than 1.53.
I'm not sure about that. 1.53d never convinced me to disable the main
toolbar, just to avoid the temptation to press a reply button
Thomas-
Saturday, June 1, 2002, 11:19:15 AM, you wrote:
TF What an excessive amount of work, I'd say. But everybody has
TF (obviously) his own way of working.
It's based on having lost months' worth of emails from corrupted
message bases in the past. I try to play it safe these days and email
Hello Mark,
On Sat, 1 Jun 2002 12:23:52 -0700 GMT (02/06/02, 02:23 +0700 GMT),
Mark Wieder wrote:
MW It's based on having lost months' worth of emails from corrupted
MW message bases in the past. I try to play it safe these days and email
MW folders with their contents constantly changing don't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Mark Wieder [MW] wrote:
...
MW It's based on having lost months' worth of emails from corrupted
MW message bases in the past. I try to play it safe these days and
MW email folders with their
Thomas-
Yup. Replaced the disk, too - it's all of about two months old. It's
nothing I can specifically blame The Bat! for, since it's sporadic,
but it's deadly when it happens and I've learned to play it safe.
Saturday, June 1, 2002, 12:33:15 PM, you wrote:
TF It does (my mileage, that is). I
Hello Allie.
At 5:00 PM on Saturday, June 01, 2002 you wrote the
following about [Email references (was: Drafts)]:
Allie I do daily backups of my mailbases just to be sure.
Allie It's done using a WinRAR command line based batch
Allie file that does a archive synchronisation and updating
Allie
Allie-
Mind you, it doesn't happen often. I'm still sold on The Bat! and get
my clients to switch to it whenever I can. But just having this happen
once will get me wary. Twice and I start to think about alternate
stragegies. To be sure, I don't back up my message bases often enough
or fully
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Jan Rifkinson [JR] wrote:
...
Allie I do daily backups of my mailbases just to be sure. It's done
Allie using a WinRAR command line based batch file that does a
Allie archive synchronisation and
On Saturday, June 1, 2002, 11:34:04 AM, Mark Wieder wrote:
If I send you a mid: link to some other folder in my system it's
useless to you.
no more so than knowing that said message was sent by said person on
said day on said date at said time.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
P O Box 47828
Wichita KS
Hello Dierk,
Saturday, June 1, 2002, 11:17:25 AM, you wrote:
Seems that %ACCOUNT and %FROM don't mix too well :-(
DH You are right. I am not quite sure if this behaviour can be changed by
DH RITLabs, since the %ACCOUNT macro - IMO - is conceptually superior (in
DH the sense of higher in the
No need to apologise. Did the reply help you?
Yes. I realized only with this thread that there is something called
rich text viewer. I never played with the color setting so I never
noticed the fixed font does not allow color etc. changing. But I am
staying with fixed font for now since I do
I've set up a reply template for the TB mail list, but it doesn't
strip the signature of the original message. I thought it did before,
but I'm not sure why it doesn't now. The template is below and I have
the quotes set for 'none' in the account preferences:
%TO=[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello
TheBat-users,
In a QT I have this:
%wrapped=tagline %COOKIE=C:\Documents and Settings\Peter
Fjelsten.K7-700\Desktop\Taglines.txt /tagline
It doesn't work. I get Path C:\Documents and Settings\Peter not found.
How can I get this to work? I want to wrap cookies from file.
--
greeting Best
Hello Peter,
It was foretold that on Sunday, June 2, 2002 at 01:24 GMT +0200, Peter
Fjelsten [PF] would type:
PF %wrapped=tagline %COOKIE=C:\Documents and Settings\Peter
PF Fjelsten.K7-700\Desktop\Taglines.txt /tagline
PF It doesn't work. I get Path C:\Documents and Settings\Peter not
Hello Paul,
An archeological dig discovered that on Saturday, June 1, 2002 at 6:08
PM, Paul Wilson [PW] typed the following:
PW No matter what I do, when I highlight a portion of a message and hit
PW F4 the cursor pops up above the quotes.
PW Also, the Bomb of the day phrase below has been
Thanks Allie.
At 6:02 PM on Saturday, June 01, 2002 you wrote the
following about [Email references (was: Drafts)]:
Allie I do daily backups of my mailbases just to be sure. It's done
Allie using a WinRAR command line based batch file that does a
Allie archive synchronisation and updating with
Saturday, 6/1/02, 8:04 PM
Hi Januk,
On Sat, 1 Jun 2002, at 19:54:30 [GMT -0700] (which was 7:54 PM where I live)
you wrote about: 'Templat problem (reply template)'
JA It looks like you have duplicate entries for the contact/group in
JA question. If either or both of the entries have AB
Alllie, does this require you to manually create a backup file from
within TB! on a regular basis?
--
JN
Allie C Martin wrote on Saturday, June 01, 2002:
Path C:\Software\winrar winrar a -u -as
\\Alliem\L\TBBackup\TB-Mail.rar C:\Mail
exit
What is the macro for the (original) message ID to which one is
replying? I can neither find it nor figure it out
--
JN
Current Ver: 1.60m
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives
Hi Joseph,
On Sat, 1 Jun 2002 23:31:57 -0500, you wrote:
Alllie, does this require you to manually create a backup file from
within TB! on a regular basis?
At a guess... no... Winrar appears to compress the Mail dir, and put it on the
server... or should I say update the one on the server. I
Hello Ray,
On Sun, 2 Jun 2002 00:00:48 +0100 GMT (02/06/02, 06:00 +0700 GMT),
Ray Dawson wrote:
RD I've set up a reply template for the TB mail list, but it doesn't
RD strip the signature of the original message. I thought it did before,
RD but I'm not sure why it doesn't now.
Whether or not
45 matches
Mail list logo
