Re: Sig cutoff

Hello Thomas Fernandez, On Monday, September 2, 2019, 2:28:46 AM, Thomas Fernandez wrote: > Funny thing, this: The cut-off works when I reply to your message, but > not when I reply to my own. I double-checked, and yes, there is one > black after the two dashes in my template... > Please try to

Re: Sig cutoff

Hello jb, On Tue, 3 Sep 2019 09:26:45 +0100 GMT (03-Sep-19, 15:26 +0700 GMT), jb_lists...@trink.co.uk wrote: > Hello Thomas Fernandez, > On Monday, September 2, 2019, 2:28:46 AM, Thomas Fernandez wrote: >> Funny thing, this: The cut-off works when I reply to your message, but >> not when I repl

Re: Sig cutoff

Hello Thomas, On Tue, 3 Sep 2019 20:09:05 +0700 GMT (03-Sep-19, 20:09 +0700 GMT), Thomas Fernandez wrote: > Hello jb, > On Tue, 3 Sep 2019 09:26:45 +0100 GMT (03-Sep-19, 15:26 +0700 GMT), > jb_lists...@trink.co.uk wrote: >> Hello Thomas Fernandez, >> On Monday, September 2, 2019, 2:28:46 AM, T

Re: Sig cutoff

Hello Thomas Fernandez, On Tuesday, September 3, 2019, 2:21:55 PM, Thomas Fernandez wrote: > ...and now it's gone. Weird. > Can someboy lese using GMX please test this, so that we can see > whether they cut trailing blanks in order to "improve" customer > experience? I don't use GMX, but lookin

Re[2]: Sig cutoff

Hello Thomas, On Tuesday, September 3, 2019, you wrote: TF> Hello Thomas, TF> On Tue, 3 Sep 2019 20:09:05 +0700 GMT (03-Sep-19, 20:09 +0700 GMT), TF> Thomas Fernandez wrote: >> Hello jb, >> On Tue, 3 Sep 2019 09:26:45 +0100 GMT (03-Sep-19, 15:26 +0700 GMT), >> jb_lists...@trink.co.uk wrote:

Re: Sig cutoff

Hello jb, On Tue, 3 Sep 2019 15:18:26 +0100 GMT (03-Sep-19, 21:18 +0700 GMT), jb_lists...@trink.co.uk wrote: > Hello Thomas Fernandez, > On Tuesday, September 3, 2019, 2:21:55 PM, Thomas Fernandez wrote: >> ...and now it's gone. Weird. >> Can someboy lese using GMX please test this, so that we