I am in the process of converting from Outlook to the Bat (1.60c) and
am busy setting up incoming filters happily.
One thing that Outlook let you specify was to automatically store a
outgoing reply in the same folder as the original message. For most
purposes this avoided the need for outgoing
Hello Allie,
Monday, April 22, 2002, 11:30:34 AM, you wrote:
I'm afraid not. You have to create outgoing filters to achieve the
same effect.
A good thing to do is that whenever you create an incoming filter,
copy it to your outbox and change the string parameter. If you filter
on sender,
Hello Allie,
Monday, April 22, 2002, 11:46:19 AM, you wrote:
No, there's no way at present.
In what situation would you want the same filter to work for multiple
accounts?
I have two main email accounts, the same people send messages to them
interchangeably, though I guess about 80% go to
Like any other folder, it does require a confirmation before deleting
all messages. However, I must agree with you that it is not that
difficult to make a mistake and delete the whole contents of a wrong
folder.
Maybe if the confirmation said Delete 9,043 Messages from Inbox
instead of
I have been trying to import my old message base from Outlook and
have not had much luck. I have selected a few folders to convert and
the process sometimes causes program errors in TB.
When it does convert I find that many messages don't have real email
addresses, so you can't reply to them or
Taylor-Davies
To: RogerLonghorn
Subject: Web Hosting
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 13:21:19 +0100
Interestingly this message is an outgoing one, maybe Outlook stores
address information differently for outgoing messages? I seem to
remember that there was a difference between incoming and outgoing
messages
On Wednesday, April 24, 2002, 10:14:35 AM, Simon wrote:
I had exactly the same problem - both with outlook and outlook
express. I got around it by dragging the messages I wanted to import
out of OE into a folder (they get saved as .EML files). I could then
use TB to import them - the
Sometimes my mail can't be sent - I get an error sorry, that domain
isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts (#5.7.1). If I restart TB the
problem (usually) goes away.
Does anyone know why this happens?
The attached log shows a message failing to be sent, then happily
being sent after restart
On Thursday, April 25, 2002, 12:15:42 PM, Roelof wrote:
That means that your ISP won't route mail to that domain. Contact the
helpdesk or the postmaster of your ISP and explain the problem. You're
sure that it's a valid address?
I know that is the problem - what I don't understand is why it
On Friday, April 26, 2002, 7:00:34 PM, Gene wrote:
I understand that Norton 2002 will scan ANY mailer's messages. I
don't know that for a fact as I have the 2001 version.
I can confirm that this is the case. I have Norton Internet Security
2002 and it works with TB, scanning incoming and
On Monday, April 29, 2002, 7:57:43 AM, Dierk wrote:
Yes. As is somewhere on RITLabs website mentioned, the registration is
valid through the complete 1.x series.
Is Version 2 imminent? I just purchased 1.6 last week, unaware of
impending major upgrades!
Regards
Christopher
On Monday, April 29, 2002, 9:44:18 AM, Dierk wrote:
1. I am not associated with RITLabs.
2. No, v2 will be the next official release - AFAWK, but it is not
imminent.
Thanks for the information - it seems as if v2 is suitably distant to
devote time to mastering/tweaking 1.6.
As for not
I think I have discovered a workaround for the intermittent problem
that I mentioned last week. The problem was that I would occasionally
get a message sorry, that domain isn't in my list of allowed
rcpthosts (#5.7.1) which would mysteriously go away later.
I now know what makes it go away.
I
On Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 12:10:31 PM, DG wrote:
Some SMTP servers, HOTPop for example, require you be authenticated to it's
POP server prior to sending through their SMTP server, hence this may, and
probably is, the reason you are getting a send error if you have not yet
authenticated,
On Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 2:47:37 PM, Anthony wrote:
You can set up BAT! to do POP authentication automatically before
retrieving email.
Thank you very much for that tip! I have made the change and can now
send email happily no matter what I have been doing before.
Another big tick for The
Over the last few days I have been noticing very long delays in
receiving mail from Compuserve. It coincides with installing TB 1.6i,j
k.
However, I don't believe that TB could be the cause. Just in case
though I thought that I would ask here in case TB could have
influenced this in any way!
On Thursday, May 9, 2002, 7:14:58 PM, Jonathan wrote:
If you're sending yourself a test message, and it leaves your
computer, and is on their systems... and takes 4 hours to get to
you... it's them. TB! has nothing to do with the mail once it has left
your computer. They
On Thursday, May 16, 2002, 2:19:06 PM, David wrote:
So I gave the ticker a second chance today, but there is one thing
that I miss in the ticker. The ticker virtual folder doesn't update
How do you enable the ticker virtual folder? I can't find any setting
that enables it?
Regards
There is a setting in the account Send Mail properties Use POP
before SMTP. The idea (I think) is that it first connects to the POP
server as some SMTP servers require you to be authenticated there
first.
The problem is that it seems to authenticate to the wrong server, so
the setting is not
On Monday, May 20, 2002, 9:15:50 PM, Miguel wrote:
Yes, there is. Click on the Use specific settings radio button and
you will get where to enter UserID and PW for SMTP authentication.
Unfortunately I have already done that, the SMTP server is set up to
use my work id and password. I just
On Tuesday, May 21, 2002, 7:45:21 AM, Thomas wrote:
Workaround: set TB so that it checks your work email every 5 minutes.
AFAIK a POP check leaves the SMTP server open for 10 minutes, so
whenever you want to send anything, a POP check has just occurred
within the time frame.
Thanks for the
On Monday, May 20, 2002, 11:48:55 PM, Chris wrote:
I am using the latter because it is free but there is a 30day trial
for Advanced Direct Remailer and is a superb piece of software.
Thanks for the recommendation Chris, I am using ADR on trial now, and
it seems to be sending correctly. The
On Tuesday, May 21, 2002, 12:47:12 PM, Marcus wrote:
Maybe the easiest solution would be to try this setup myself. My final
question then is, will I notice any problems or could I be in a
position where I believe that the mail has been delivered although
they were rejected by the other side?
On Tuesday, May 21, 2002, 9:39:18 AM, Syafril wrote:
You are using XP eh.., you can activate IIS-SMTP then. IMHO IIS SMTP5
quite OK.
Is that installed as a standard part of Windows XP Professional? There
is nothing resembling it in my list of services.
Regards
Christopher
On Tuesday, June 25, 2002, 9:13:41 AM, Ben wrote:
I mean, when I'm viewing this mailing list, it pretty much might as
well be a newsgroup - what differences are there in functionality? I
for one cannot think of many.
For me email is generally addressed to me and relates to my
activities. I
On Wednesday, July 17, 2002, 5:11:54 AM, Sudip wrote:
Will it convert NTFS to FAT32 without losing data? I think XP
converts FAT32 to NTFS without having to format the drive , thereby
maintaining data integrity.
It will convert FAT32 to NTFS safely. However, you don't get the best
results
On Tuesday, August 27, 2002, 6:31:18 AM, Alaeddin wrote:
alt + F12 does not seem to work niether does Ctrl M to mark all read.
Is there something I am missing
It may be that the focus is on the wrong pane. If the focus is on the
folder list then some of the message specific hotkeys don't
I am not sure if this has been reported before, but when you have the
Sorting Office window open, and a filter selected in the listbox the
two Copy options are misleading.
If you right click on the filter and choose Copy, the filter is placed
on the clipboard and can then be pasted into another
On Tuesday, October 1, 2002, 12:34:50 PM, Scott wrote:
Certain internet programs do not like losing connection. One of my
co-workers tells me that Norton AV (or Norton Internet Security, one
of those Norton programs) does not like it when a full-time connection
(cable or DSL) goes
On Tuesday, October 1, 2002, 12:34:50 PM, Scott wrote:
Certain internet programs do not like losing connection. One of my
co-workers tells me that Norton AV (or Norton Internet Security, one
of those Norton programs) does not like it when a full-time connection
(cable or DSL) goes
On Tuesday, October 1, 2002, 12:34:50 PM, Scott wrote:
Certain internet programs do not like losing connection. One of my
co-workers tells me that Norton AV (or Norton Internet Security, one
of those Norton programs) does not like it when a full-time connection
(cable or DSL) goes
On Monday, October 14, 2002, 2:33:37 PM, Nick wrote:
There is a new PGP 8.0 Public Beta that is out, and by using PGPTray
you can use that version with any Mail Client you want.
I have downloaded and installed PGP 8 Beta, but I am at a loss as to
how to make PGPTray work with TB? If you were
On Monday, October 14, 2002, 3:06:32 PM, Christopher wrote:
I have downloaded and installed PGP 8 Beta, but I am at a loss as to
how to make PGPTray work with TB? If you were able to provide a few
pointers that would be grand!
Oops - I was too quick off the mark. I have managed to make it
On Monday, October 14, 2002, 4:11:33 PM, Allie wrote:
You can configure the PGP hotkeys to carry out the clipboard options
for you. Going to the menu's every time is tedious. However, hitting
the hotkeys aren't.
Curiously PGP 8 gives the following result when validating your
messagee. Do you
On Tuesday, October 15, 2002, 7:09:35 AM, Jonathan wrote:
Read the message carefully... now go into PGP and verify Allie's key
(sign it yourself with non-exportable signature).. then reverify the
signature :) See what happens.
Excellent! Now I see how things work. Thanks to you both for
Is it possible to change the size of the font in the mail dispatcher?
I have started to use it as a rudimentary spam filter but on my
screen it is all a bit too small and I am worried I will uncheck the
wrong box!
--
Regards
Christopher mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using
36 matches
Mail list logo
