Re: Bayes***** Plug-In.

2004-08-14 Thread Eddie Castelli
Dear Chris, -- Freitag, 13. August 2004, 19:22:38: EC Sure I can. Here it comes Thanks for posting that, it made for very interesting reading. :-/ Which leads me to the following questions; My pleasure :) 1. Why have the option to install more than one anti-spam plug-in? Well

more than just spam/ham classification (was: Re: Bayes***** Plug-In.)

2004-08-14 Thread dAniel hAhler
Hello TBUDL, on Thu, 12. Aug 2004 at 22:54:24 +0200 Alexander S. Kunz wrote: Bayesfilter Bayesit! I tried Bayesfilter, but somehow it did not learn as fast as BayesIt. However, I'm using PopFile now and use Virtual Folders to reflect the bucket classification of PopFile (except for spam, of

Re: more than just spam/ham classification (was: Re: Bayes***** Plug-In.)

2004-08-14 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello dAniel hAhler, 15-Aug-2004 00:28, you wrote: I tried Bayesfilter, but somehow it did not learn as fast as BayesIt. However, I'm using PopFile now and use Virtual Folders to reflect the bucket classification of PopFile (except for spam, of course). But you cannot reflect real bucket

Re: Bayes***** Plug-In.

2004-08-13 Thread Giampaolo Bellavite
Il 12/08/2004 alle 19.58, Chris Weaven [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: Hi all, After a few problems with the Bayesit plug-in, I went over to SpamPal as my spam filter. The reason why I left Bayesit in the first place, was that as I was testing betas etc, Bayesit would no longer catch any

Re[2]: Bayes***** Plug-In.

2004-08-13 Thread Peter Kerekes
Hello Giampaolo, Friday, August 13, 2004, 5:09:27 AM, you wrote: GB Il 12/08/2004 alle 19.58, Chris Weaven [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: Hi all, After a few problems with the Bayesit plug-in, I went over to SpamPal as my spam filter. The reason why I left Bayesit in the first place, was

Re: Bayes***** Plug-In.

2004-08-13 Thread Eddie Castelli
Dear Chris, -- Donnerstag, 12. August 2004, 19:58:49: The reason why I left Bayesit in the first place, was that as I was testing betas etc, Bayesit would no longer catch any mail!? It was like it was losing it's database. Did anyone else experience this? Never experienced your

Re: Bayes***** Plug-In.

2004-08-13 Thread Eddie Castelli
Dear Chris, -- Donnerstag, 12. August 2004, 23:07:50: Now, I've just had a thought and not sure if this is a good idea or not. Can I run them both at the same time? I did this at the beginning. Then Alexey Vinogradov who develops the BayesIt! gave me an explanation of why this should not

Re: Bayes***** Plug-In.

2004-08-13 Thread Eddie Castelli
Dear Peter, -- Freitag, 13. August 2004, 15:46:18: How did you use the search function for training non-junk mail? If you want to train JunkMails just select them with your Cursor and 'mark then as Junk' (in the Context Menu|Special|Mark as Junk). -- liebe GrĂ¼sse

Re: Bayes***** Plug-In.

2004-08-13 Thread Chris Weaven
Hi Eddie, On Friday, August 13, 2004 17:05 your local time, which was 16:05 my local time, Eddie Castelli [EC] wrote; EC Should you not have this posting I can send it to you by PM or EC publish it here on the list. Can you possibly re-post it here, as I think other people following this thread

Re: Bayes***** Plug-In.

2004-08-13 Thread Eddie Castelli
Dear Chris, -- Freitag, 13. August 2004, 18:03:28: EC Should you not have this posting I can send it to you by PM or EC publish it here on the list. Can you possibly re-post it here, as I think other people following this thread might be interested. Sure I can. Here it comes

Re: Bayes***** Plug-In.

2004-08-13 Thread Chris Weaven
Hi Eddie, On Friday, August 13, 2004 18:15 your local time, which was 17:15 my local time, Eddie Castelli [EC] wrote; EC Sure I can. Here it comes Thanks for posting that, it made for very interesting reading. :-/ Which leads me to the following questions; 1. Why have the option to

Bayes***** Plug-In.

2004-08-12 Thread Chris Weaven
Hi all, After a few problems with the Bayesit plug-in, I went over to SpamPal as my spam filter. The reason why I left Bayesit in the first place, was that as I was testing betas etc, Bayesit would no longer catch any mail!? It was like it was losing it's database. Did anyone else experience

Re: Bayes***** Plug-In.

2004-08-12 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Chris Weaven, 12-Aug-2004 19:58, you wrote: Bayesfilter Bayesit! I tried Bayesfilter, but somehow it did not learn as fast as BayesIt. However, I'm using PopFile now and use Virtual Folders to reflect the bucket classification of PopFile (except for spam, of course). -- Best regards,

Re: Bayes***** Plug-In.

2004-08-12 Thread Chris Weaven
Hi Alexander, On Thursday, August 12, 2004 22:54 your local time, which was 21:54 my local time, Alexander Kunz [ASK] wrote; Bayesfilter Bayesit! ASK I tried Bayesfilter, but somehow it did not learn as fast as BayesIt. ASK However, I'm using PopFile now and use Virtual Folders to reflect the

Re: Bayes***** Plug-In.

2004-08-12 Thread AceMan
Chris Weaven said: Hmm, I've just been playing with them both to see how they work and using my test base, they seem pretty similar in the outcome. Now, I've just had a thought and not sure if this is a good idea or not. Can I run them both at the same time? Yes, they can. I have been