Hello dAniel,
Thursday, September 2, 2004, 1:02:52 PM, you wrote:
Hello TBUDL,
on Wed, 1. Sep 2004 at 20:46:13 -0700 Dennis W. Greer wrote:
The funny thing is Outlook is now a better client than TB!.
Top posting good. Bottom posting annoying!
What about 'in between' posting.
That's the
Hello Doug Weller,
03-Sep-2004 00:13, you wrote:
Alexander The so called search folders in Outlook 2003 look good at
Alexander first, but they are, as with every MS product, hard to set up
Alexander correctly. TB's VF's produce the wanted search results much
Alexander easier, accessible on ONE
Hello Dennis,
Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 9:46:13 PM, you wrote:
DWG Top posting good. Bottom posting annoying!
My thoughts exactly Only in reverse...
--
Leif Gregory (TB list moderator and fellow end user).
Tagline of the day:
A baseball pitcher's arm rotates from the shoulder at
Mark Partous wrote:
DWG Does The Bat 3 still have the connection center malfunction?
Don't have any problem with it. What's malfunctioning for you?
I don't know what Deniss's problem with the CC is, but for me, if I
abort/delete all tasks in the CC, I am unable to close TB as it says
tasks are
On Thursday, September 2, 2004 @ 9:56:34 PM, MikeD (3) wrote:
[snips]
DWG Top posting good. Bottom posting annoying!
MikeD I think we are in the minority, thought sigh
Yes, linear thought is just SO 20th century :-)
--
cheers, Mic (reply address works) This whole mad cow thing has me
Hi Alexander,
Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 12:54:21 PM, you wrote:
TB has VFs and, from what I have heard, with more functionality or
possibilities than Outlook.
Alexander The so called search folders in Outlook 2003
Alexander look good at first, but
Alexander they are, as with every MS
Hello Cory,
Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 11:47:57 AM, you wrote:
C On Wed, 01 Sep 2004 08:32:52 +0200, Alexander S. Kunz
C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have enough of Ritlabs. As soon as this v2.12 doesn't do what I need
anymore, I'm off for another email client ...
C I fully agree. Add to
Graham Dodd wrote on 01 September 2004 11:13:
Anyone got any other suggestions for mail clients ?
I joined this list because I saw the announcement and thought - perhaps they
fixed the smart word wrapping/justification issues within the Micro Ed text
editor and also fixed some of the other
Hi Morgan,
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004, at 11:15:27 [GMT+0100] (which was 20:15:27 Australian
Eastern Time) you wrote:
The funny thing is Outlook is now a better client than TB!. Outlook
2003 has virtual folders, an excellent filtering system, secure
e-mail reading features such as not downloading
John Phillips wrote on 01 September 2004 11:33:
Does it still top post?
Unfortunately it does. But thankfully somebody came up with a solution to
that and this is what I've been using for many months without any issues:
http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/outlook-quotefix/
There's also a
Hello Morgan,
The funny thing is Outlook is now a better client than TB!.
I doubt it.
Outlook 2003 has virtual folders
TB has VFs and, from what I have heard, with more functionality or
possibilities than Outlook.
an excellent filtering system,
I again doubt it. Does Outlook allow you to
On Wednesday, September 1, 2004 @ 6:59:51 PM, Mark Partous wrote:
[snips]
Does it still top post?
MD Unfortunately it does. But thankfully somebody came up with a solution to
MD that and this is what I've been using for many months without any issues:
Mark Does it still uses loads of memory
Hello Graham,
Any idea how I can get all my mails from TB into Outlook
You should ask that in an Outlook users mailing list, don't you think?
;-)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.0
Current version
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 12:45:24 +0200, MAU [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Outlook 2003 has virtual folders
TB has VFs and, from what I have heard, with more functionality or
possibilities than Outlook.
The so called search folders in Outlook 2003 look good at first, but
they are, as with every MS
Hello Martyn,
It's irritating when an email client (not just The Bat!) doesn't do it
for you - more so in Thunderbird than any other client. When you do
Rewrap (or ALT-L in The Bat!) it does it wonderfully - but why can't it
do this when you hit the Reply button so that the user is left with
Hi,
On Wednesday, September 1, 2004 at 12:13:28 PM, Graham Dodd wrote:
Anyone got any other suggestions for mail clients ?
Becky!
--
Ludovic LE MOAL (Quimper - France)
URL:http://www.lemoal.org/ ICQ# 92250692
Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows 98 4.10
Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
For me, proper formatting of text-only messages, including the ability
to re-flow quotes, is very important, and neither Outlook nor Opera's
M2 or AK-Mail or Thunderbird (haven't tried others) has any function
like that of TB's ALT-L keyboard shortcut - I'm using it
Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 6:21:49 AM, you wrote:
MDP It can. See Editor preferences: Smart
MDP wrapping of quoted text.
It's checked in my preferences, but doesn't do it ..
Lynn
TBv.2.12.00
NT5 SP4
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]* * *Aun Aprendo
I'd rather be WARP'ed* * * Team
Lynn wrote:
M3 The best suggestion that I have heard is stay with
M3 2.12. It works well enough for me (but I don't need
M3 IMAP ... which was promised for 2 ... wasn't it? :-/ )
And has it improved with v3?
I've tried at least 3 other IMAP clients which are
supposed to be excellent, but if that's
Hello Lynn,
01-Sep-2004 17:56, you wrote:
MDP It can. See Editor preferences: Smart wrapping of quoted text.
It's checked in my preferences, but doesn't do it ..
I'm using the %SmartQuotes macro from the MyMacros pack for that:
http://en.barin.com.ua/soft/mymacros/
--
Best regards,
20 matches
Mail list logo
