Re: Dates...

1999-12-17 Thread Ali Martin
On Fri, 17 Dec 1999 13:48:04 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote: [] AM I sort my messages by the received time though I leave that column out AM of my mail listing. I don't understand how you can sort on a parameter you leave out. Do you mean you are not sorting them at all, just leave them in

Re: Dates...

1999-12-17 Thread Ali Martin
On Thu, 16 Dec 1999 23:57:24 -0600, Travisimo! wrote: [] shrug I'm definitely in the GMT -0600 Central time zone. Perhaps my mail goes to a mail server in the EST time zone? I haven't a clue. Since only certain messages I receive have incorrect dates, I guess I can only assume it's an

Re: Dates...

1999-12-17 Thread Ali Martin
On Fri, 17 Dec 1999 06:59:46 +0100, Roel wrote: [] TF I don't understand how you can sort on a parameter you leave out. Do TF you mean you are not sorting them at all, just leave them in the order TF they come in? set the column to display, sort on it, set the column to dissappear :-)

Re: Dates...

1999-12-17 Thread Keith Russell
Hello, fellow Bat-lovers. On Friday, December 17, 1999, 6:09:24 AM, Ali wrote: On Fri, 17 Dec 1999 06:59:46 +0100, Roel wrote: [] TF I don't understand how you can sort on a parameter you leave out. Do TF you mean you are not sorting them at all, just leave them in the order TF they come

Re: Dates...

1999-12-16 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
Hi Travisimo!, On 16 December 1999 at 01:02:06 GMT -0600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points: T So my question is: is The Bat displaying the date wrong for some T reason, should I assume the date is set wrong on this person's T computer, or what? I know my date is set right.

Re: Dates...

1999-12-16 Thread Ali Martin
On Thu, 16 Dec 1999 22:42:15 -0600, Travisimo! wrote: Ok, I understand that. So I wouldn't want to sort my messages by the Received date because many messages could have the same stamp if I download them at once. I sort my messages by the received time though I leave that column out of my