Monday, May 3, 2004, 10:33:40 PM, you wrote:
do FastMail and MailSnare actually forward the mail out? If so, why
can't it be forwarded to a POP account in TB?
CT Have a look at FastMail's features.
Yes, I did that yesterday after I'd posted .. I often do
things backwards :-)
CT Go to
Tuesday, May 4, 2004, 7:57:28 AM, you wrote:
PF TB! filtering engine is being rewritten as it
PF does not work for IMAP at
PF the moment.
PF Watch coming releases...
I will .. thanks
Lynn
TBv 2.04.7 Windowsv 5
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]* * *Aun Aprendo
I'd rather be WARP'ed* * *
Tuesday, May 4, 2004, 11:07:12 AM, you wrote:
CT This is straight from FM's FAQ - it's a one-off set up..
Thank you! Apparently I didn't read far enough into the
FAQ ... sorry ... So that might be workable .. I might
have to do some tinkering here.
Lynn
TBv 2.04.7 Windowsv 5
--
[EMAIL
Sunday, May 2, 2004, 7:47:33 AM, you wrote:
CT Hi Dave,
nothing else I've tried comes close to TB! for most features, but IMAP
has become essential, and perhaps I'll need to compromise in other
areas to get acceptable IMAP support.
CT Exactly my conclusion. I've lost patience recently and
Monday, May 3, 2004, 10:42:50 AM, you wrote:
CT I've just mentioned to Jim that FastMail or
CT Mailsnare offer extremely
CT good POP, IMAP and forwarding facilities for external mail.
well, I'm looking at Mulberry, but ... :-( I'm really not
keen on web interfaces; do FastMail and MailSnare
E-Mail Message
~~
From: Dave Gorman
Date: Saturday, May 01, 2004 at 7:41 AM
Subject: Re: IMAP rules ..
_
_\/_
o/\o
DG Hello Jody,
DG Friday, April 30, 2004, 8:17:53 PM, you wrote:
do incoming rules
Hello all,
Saturday, May 1, 2004, Dave Gorman wrote:
do incoming rules work automatically when using IMAP and TheBat?
No. It has been promised, but the timeline is anyone's guess. At this
point it seems the virtual folders are a higher priority.
new filtering system is under development
7 matches
Mail list logo
