Sunday, May 2, 2004, 7:47:33 AM, you wrote:

CT> Hi Dave,

>> nothing else I've tried comes close to TB! for most features, but IMAP
>> has become essential, and perhaps I'll need to compromise in other
>> areas to get acceptable IMAP support.

CT> Exactly my conclusion. I've lost patience recently and registered
CT> Mulberry which I'm using heavily for my domain/IMAP traffic. If only
CT> that prog had some of the nice features of TB I'd die happy.


I just recently set up an IMAP account with the smtp (outgoing)
specified, and I forward the IMAP incoming to a POP3 account, and set up a
filter to change the colo(u)r option for the mail from that account.
So I read the mail via a pop3 account, and send mail via the IMAP smtp
server.  So far so good.

Jim Lady
Seattle




________________________________________________
Current version is 2.10.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply via email to