> "Mo" == Mo DeJong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mo> On Mon, 28 Aug 2000, Daniel Wickstrom wrote:
>> I would anticipate some changes to the autoconf files and
>> makefile templates, and the addition of some aolserver specific
>> 'c' files.
Mo> That does not sound too bad.
On Mon, 28 Aug 2000, Daniel Wickstrom wrote:
> I would anticipate some changes to the autoconf files and makefile
> templates, and the addition of some aolserver specific 'c' files.
That does not sound too bad. How about a src/aolserver subdirectory
for your .c files?
> I don't expect a firm co
> "Mo" == Mo DeJong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mo> On Mon, 28 Aug 2000, Daniel Wickstrom wrote:
>> > "Mo" == Mo DeJong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> Also, when I get tclblend working in aolserver, would you be
>> interested in incorporating the changes in tclble
On Mon, 28 Aug 2000, Daniel Wickstrom wrote:
> > "Mo" == Mo DeJong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Mo> On Wed, 23 Aug 2000, Daniel Wickstrom wrote:
> >> I'm curious about the JavaInfo structure in javaCmd.c. When I
> >> looked at this before, I assumed that you would need a sepe
> "Mo" == Mo DeJong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mo> On Wed, 23 Aug 2000, Daniel Wickstrom wrote:
>> I'm curious about the JavaInfo structure in javaCmd.c. When I
>> looked at this before, I assumed that you would need a seperate
>> JavaInfo structure per thread. The code I'm
On Wed, 23 Aug 2000, Daniel Wickstrom wrote:
> I'm curious about the JavaInfo structure in javaCmd.c. When I looked
> at this before, I assumed that you would need a seperate JavaInfo
> structure per thread. The code I'm looking at now seems to assume one
> global JavaInfo structure that can be
On Thu, 24 Aug 2000, Daniel Wickstrom wrote:
> > "Mo" == Mo DeJong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> Mo> So it looks like you are right, we need to put the method
> Mo> cache in thread local storage. The contract branch is clearly
> Mo> not finished, there is a lot of work that
> "Mo" == Mo DeJong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mo> So it looks like you are right, we need to put the method
Mo> cache in thread local storage. The contract branch is clearly
Mo> not finished, there is a lot of work that still needs to be
Mo> done.
Ok thanks for the sanity
On Wed, 23 Aug 2000, Daniel Wickstrom wrote:
> After moving back to the u.s., I've started looking into integrating
> tclblend into aolserver/nsjava again. Last night I checked out the cvs
> sources from the cvs ajuba contract branch, and started to compare it
> to version 1.2.6.
Welcome back