Penned by Reyk Floeter on 20121129 6:33.47, we have:
| On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
| >> But currently /dev/tunN is usable from any programming language that
| >> that can do reads and writes. With Reyk's changes you need to do an
| >> ioc
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Philip Guenther wrote:
> The diff below changes the alt sig stack logic to dynamically determine
> whether the thread is currently on the alt stack, by comparing the stack
> pointer against the altstack base and size, so that you get the correct
> answer if you lo
> Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 00:12:39 +0100
> From: Reyk Floeter
>
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Mark Kettenis
> wrote:
> > But currently /dev/tunN is usable from any programming language that
> > that can do reads and writes. With Reyk's changes you need to do an
> > ioctl even for basic us
> My favourite "quick-and-dirty" language is Python, and I consider
> myself a fairly proficient Python programmer. I've never, ever, done
> ioctls from Python, and while it looks indeed as if it is possible to
> do so, I'm sure it'd take me some effort to get it right.
I definitely agree with yo
> Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 13:33:47 +0100
> From: Reyk Floeter
>
> btw., I like C and it is still my favorite language (sorry, CS
> people). But it shouldn't be a problem to do simple ioctls with most
> other languages except shell scripts.
>
> #!/usr/bin/perl
> require "sys/ioctl.ph";
> $TUNSIFUN
> From: Mike Belopuhov
> Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 21:41:28 +0100
>
> On 29 November 2012 21:37, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 09:21:49PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> >> > Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 20:49:00 +0100
> >> > From: Claudio Jeker
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 11:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 09:37:53PM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> On 29 November 2012 21:21, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> >> Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 20:49:00 +0100
> >> From: Claudio Jeker
> >>
> >> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 11:50:09AM -0500, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 04:4
On 29 November 2012 21:37, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 09:21:49PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> > Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 20:49:00 +0100
>> > From: Claudio Jeker
>> >
>> > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 11:50:09AM -0500, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
>> > > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 04:41
On 29 November 2012 21:21, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 20:49:00 +0100
>> From: Claudio Jeker
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 11:50:09AM -0500, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
>> > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 04:41:09PM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
>> > > hi,
>> > >
>> > > drivers ex age
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 09:21:49PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 20:49:00 +0100
> > From: Claudio Jeker
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 11:50:09AM -0500, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 04:41:09PM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> > > > hi,
> > > >
> Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 20:49:00 +0100
> From: Claudio Jeker
>
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 11:50:09AM -0500, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 04:41:09PM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> > > hi,
> > >
> > > drivers ex age alc ale jme se vic vte xe upl and octeon/cmac
> > > mak
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 09:10:58PM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> On 29 November 2012 20:49, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 11:50:09AM -0500, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> >> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 04:41:09PM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> >> > hi,
> >> >
> >> > drivers ex age a
On 29 November 2012 20:49, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 11:50:09AM -0500, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 04:41:09PM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
>> > hi,
>> >
>> > drivers ex age alc ale jme se vic vte xe upl and octeon/cmac
>> > make use of the if_iqdrops
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 11:50:09AM -0500, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 04:41:09PM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> > hi,
> >
> > drivers ex age alc ale jme se vic vte xe upl and octeon/cmac
> > make use of the if_iqdrops counter that is not shown by any of our
> > tools (lik
makes cloned devices line up well with the rest of the output:
_dhcpdhclient 30880 text / 14 -r-xr-xr-x r 283856
_dhcpdhclient 30880 wd /var77953 drwxr-xr-x r 512
_dhcpdhclient 30880 root /var77953 drwxr-xr-x r 512
_dhcpdhclien
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 04:41:09PM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> hi,
>
> drivers ex age alc ale jme se vic vte xe upl and octeon/cmac
> make use of the if_iqdrops counter that is not shown by any of our
> tools (like netstat). looks like most of its usage comes from
> freebsd where they show it
* Reyk Floeter [2012-11-29 15:31]:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> > Please note that pfctl/altq has a bug where bandwidth specification
> > expressed in percentage gets converted to the absolute value when
> > pfctl is run. And since for some NICs in some setups it mi
hi,
drivers ex age alc ale jme se vic vte xe upl and octeon/cmac
make use of the if_iqdrops counter that is not shown by any of our
tools (like netstat). looks like most of its usage comes from
freebsd where they show it in the "netstat -di" output in a new
column. do we want to do that or just
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
>> OK?
>>
>
> Please note that pfctl/altq has a bug where bandwidth specification
> expressed in percentage gets converted to the absolute value when
> pfctl is run. And since for some NICs in some setups it might take
> some time to acquire
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 2:25 AM, Brad Smith wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 10:24:00PM -0500, Brad Smith wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 11:57:50AM -0200, Gleydson Soares wrote:
>> > set ifp->if_baudrate with IF_Gbps() / IF_Mbps().
>> >
>> > OK ?
>>
>> Although it has already been commited its
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 2:28 PM, mxb wrote:
> There is however, no problem then:
>
> plugged -> boot -> wait -> unplug -> wait -> plug in.
>
> On 27 nov 2012, at 13:50, mxb wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi tech@,
>>
>> ix(4) does not detects link then cable is plugged in into already running
>> machine.
>>
>>
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 12:38 PM, mxb wrote:
> Compiling if_ix.c with IX_DEBUG yields
>
> ../../../../dev/pci/if_ix.c: In function 'ixgbe_print_hw_stats':
> ../../../../dev/pci/if_ix.c:3525: error: 'struct ix_softc' has no member named
> 'mbuf_alloc_failed'
> ../../../../dev/pci/if_ix.c:3526: erro
On 11/29/2012 01:33 PM, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
>>> But currently /dev/tunN is usable from any programming language that
>>> that can do reads and writes. With Reyk's changes you need to do an
>>> ioctl even for basic usage, which is at best q
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 01:33:47PM +0100, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> >> But currently /dev/tunN is usable from any programming language that
> >> that can do reads and writes. With Reyk's changes you need to do an
> >> ioctl even for basic usag
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
>> But currently /dev/tunN is usable from any programming language that
>> that can do reads and writes. With Reyk's changes you need to do an
>> ioctl even for basic usage, which is at best quirky in languages other
>> than C/C++. That fee
On 2012/11/28 22:21, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> >> Drawback: This diff would require to patch all the existing users of
> >> /dev/tun* in ports and the tree to add the TUNSIFUNIT ioctl. The
> >> benefit is that you don't have to MAKEDEV all the tuns anymore and can
> >> open up to around 1024 active
Adapted from
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=128919130029011&w=2
OK?
Index: dev/pci/azalia_codec.c
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/azalia_codec.c,v
retrieving revision 1.151
diff -u -p -r1.151 azalia_codec.c
--- dev/pci/
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> From: Mike Belopuhov
>> Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 22:21:07 +0100
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Mark Kettenis
>> wrote:
>> >> Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 17:39:24 +0100
>> >> From: Reyk Floeter
>> >>
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> inspired by mi
28 matches
Mail list logo
