Hi Ivan. Think I know who you are, and can guess why.
This seems misguided. We have a horrible program called "file", but
in general people identify what a file is what what purpose it serves
not just by the filename, but also by how it starts. The "untrusted
comment" has become the way to
Hi all,
As the title says - bring the link in line with the others.
Regards,
Raf
Index: openssh/manual.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/www/openssh/manual.html,v
retrieving revision 1.38
diff -u -p -r1.38 manual.html
---
At the moment signify(1) requires sigfiles to begin with 'untrusted
comment: '. Sometimes one wants to have no comments and just signature
itself.
Index: signify.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/signify/signify.c,v
retrieving
On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 20:48 +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 12:13:20PM +0200, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> > m_pullup will always get a new mbuf and on
> > strict alignment architectures you will always do a m_dup_pkt
> > (verified by my -DTEST1).
>
> i didnt think m_pullup was
Hi tech,
while trying the latest snapshot I've noticed that the following
warning is printed to a console several times a second (this does not
happen in 6.0):
acpi0: WARNING EC not initialized
The investigation shows that the acpiec initialization fails in
acpiec.c line 484:
if (size != 2 ||
This diff brings the relayd(8) proc.c up-to-date and removes the file limit
alteration in relayd.c. The file limit alteration is not needed anymore
since now the number of descriptors pre-allocated is very small (only one
descriptor per child + 2 to distribute fds between child).
It would be nice
Here is an initial implementation of draft-ietf-idr-large-community for
OpenBGPD. I can connect and exchange routes with these attributes
against exabgp.
Normal communities are two 16bit numbers. With the addition of
32bit ASNs, those will not work if you wish to control one of
them.
Large
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 06:43:05PM +0200, Jan Stary wrote:
> The rcctl(8) manpage makes the distinction between 'daemons' and 'services',
> and the description of some items in the output of 'rcctl ls'
> mentions only 'daemons'. But they are both 'services and deamons'
> in all cases (tested with
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 08:15:19PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> So rn_refines() is a function from the deep underbelly of radix code.
> In my opinion if.c should not use this function especially now that we use
> art for routing table lookups. Instead I implemented a simple
> ifa_netmask_cmp()
With the embedded cp.c and rm.c,
the pathnames of "/bin/cp" and "/bin/rm" are not needed.
Jan
On Oct 10 15:22:01, t...@tedunangst.com wrote:
> Jan Stary wrote:
> > Why do we need to trim the newlines in unexpand(1)?
> > The result seems to be the same without it.
> >
> > Jan
> >
> >
> > Index: unexpand.c
> > ===
> > RCS
The embedded cpmain() will never have _any_ flags set,
as mv.c calls it as
argv[0] = from;
argv[1] = to;
argv[2] = NULL;
cpmain(2, argv);
There is probably more code that could be romoved
form the embedded cp.c, along the lines of tedu's recent
cleanup of the
On Oct 10 15:30:52, t...@tedunangst.com wrote:
> Jan Stary wrote:
> > In unexpand.c, the -a indicator is
> > both a global int and a local char.
>
> I think this is backwards. We want fewer globals, not more.
OK, other way round.
Jan
Index: unexpand.c
Jan Stary wrote:
> In unexpand.c, the -a indicator is
> both a global int and a local char.
I think this is backwards. We want fewer globals, not more.
On 10 October 2016 at 20:15, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> So rn_refines() is a function from the deep underbelly of radix code.
> In my opinion if.c should not use this function especially now that we use
> art for routing table lookups. Instead I implemented a simple
>
Jan Stary wrote:
> Why do we need to trim the newlines in unexpand(1)?
> The result seems to be the same without it.
>
> Jan
>
>
> Index: unexpand.c
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/unexpand/unexpand.c,v
> retrieving
In unexpand.c, the -a indicator is
both a global int and a local char.
Jan
Index: unexpand.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/unexpand/unexpand.c,v
retrieving revision 1.12
diff -u -p -r1.12 unexpand.c
--- unexpand.c 11 Nov
> Am 10.10.2016 um 18:47 schrieb Rafael Zalamena :
>
>> On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 12:32:49PM +0200, Reyk Floeter wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 11:54:37PM +0200, Rafael Zalamena wrote:
On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 07:46:52PM +0200, Rafael Zalamena wrote:
This diff
Why do we need to trim the newlines in unexpand(1)?
The result seems to be the same without it.
Jan
Index: unexpand.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/unexpand/unexpand.c,v
retrieving revision 1.12
diff -u -p -r1.12
As far as I can tell, ddb's examine /m format
/mdisplay in unsigned hex with character dump at the end
of each line. The location is also displayed in hex at
the beginning of each line.
has been documented since the start of the
So rn_refines() is a function from the deep underbelly of radix code.
In my opinion if.c should not use this function especially now that we use
art for routing table lookups. Instead I implemented a simple
ifa_netmask_cmp() function that does what the code expects and compares
the two netmasks.
Jan Stary wrote:
> bin/mv has its own copies of cp.c and mv.c.
> Apparently, they are modifications of cp's cp.c and rm's rm.c,
> used when moving as "copy and remove the source".
>
> In bin/mv/rm.c, the following snippet of rm_file() confuses me:
>
> if (S_ISDIR(sb.st_mode)) {
>
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 12:32:49PM +0200, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 11:54:37PM +0200, Rafael Zalamena wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 07:46:52PM +0200, Rafael Zalamena wrote:
> > > This diff makes proc.c daemons to use less file descriptors on startup,
> > > this way we
The rcctl(8) manpage makes the distinction between 'daemons' and 'services',
and the description of some items in the output of 'rcctl ls'
mentions only 'daemons'. But they are both 'services and deamons'
in all cases (tested with e.g. postgresql running, stopped, or failed).
Jan
Index:
On Oct 10 12:25:39, h...@stare.cz wrote:
> bin/mv has its own copies of cp.c and mv.c.
> Apparently, they are modifications of cp's cp.c and rm's rm.c,
> used when moving as "copy and remove the source".
>
> In bin/mv/rm.c, the following snippet of rm_file() confuses me:
>
> if
Hi,
Jan Stary wrote on Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 02:22:57PM +0200:
> The postscript output of 'man -Tps rcctl' makes the 'stopped'
> list item of 'rcctl ls' break a line, while all the other items
> are compact one-liners. The diff below changes the width,
> which is the same for ascci, but "stopped"
> > The postscript output of 'man -Tps rcctl' makes the 'stopped'
> > list item of 'rcctl ls' break a line, while all the other items
> > are compact one-liners. The diff below changes the width,
> > which is the same for ascci, but "stopped" is slightly wider
> > than "started" in the postscript
Hi,
Jan Stary wrote on Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 02:22:57PM +0200:
> The postscript output of 'man -Tps rcctl' makes the 'stopped'
> list item of 'rcctl ls' break a line, while all the other items
> are compact one-liners. The diff below changes the width,
> which is the same for ascci, but "stopped"
The postscript output of 'man -Tps rcctl' makes the 'stopped'
list item of 'rcctl ls' break a line, while all the other items
are compact one-liners. The diff below changes the width,
which is the same for ascci, but "stopped" is slightly wider
than "started" in the postscript output.
Jan
On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 09:21:48PM +0200, Martin Natano wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 02:32:12PM +0200, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > while looking at what is needed to switch the xenocara build system to
> > the same kind of scheme as base (no more SUDO, start as root and drop
> >
On 10 October 2016 at 05:48, David Gwynne wrote:
> if the arch can cope with prepending on an unaligned address in
> vxlan, then let it do it.
>
> this means less work if we can get away with it.
>
> ok?
>
I think it's safe to use mtod here. Getting an IP packet with an
On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 11:54:37PM +0200, Rafael Zalamena wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 07:46:52PM +0200, Rafael Zalamena wrote:
> > This diff makes proc.c daemons to use less file descriptors on startup,
> > this way we increase the number of child we can have considerably. This
> > also
On 10 October 2016 at 10:56, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 13:48:18 +1000
>> From: David Gwynne
>>
>> if the arch can cope with prepending on an unaligned address in
>> vxlan, then let it do it.
>>
>> this means less work if we can
bin/mv has its own copies of cp.c and mv.c.
Apparently, they are modifications of cp's cp.c and rm's rm.c,
used when moving as "copy and remove the source".
In bin/mv/rm.c, the following snippet of rm_file() confuses me:
if (S_ISDIR(sb.st_mode)) {
warnx("%s: is a
> Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 13:48:18 +1000
> From: David Gwynne
>
> if the arch can cope with prepending on an unaligned address in
> vxlan, then let it do it.
>
> this means less work if we can get away with it.
>
> ok?
Let's face it. The vxlan protocol is badly designed.
ok yasuoka
thanks,
On Mon, 10 Oct 2016 13:48:18 +1000
David Gwynne wrote:
> if the arch can cope with prepending on an unaligned address in
> vxlan, then let it do it.
>
> this means less work if we can get away with it.
>
> ok?
>
> Index: if_vxlan.c
>
36 matches
Mail list logo