On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 05:47:05PM +0100, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
>> Building ld.so with clang on amd64 fails with undefined references
>> to memset and memcpy. That is odd, since neither function appears
>> in the
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 12:08:23PM +0100, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> After ospfd here's a diff to make ospf6d refresh his view of an
> interface's MTU at runtime. This needs a fresh kernel.
>
> The parent should pass the IFINFO message to its children first, and
> then decide
NET_LOCK() should raise IPL before acquiring the lock, and NET_UNLOCK()
should restore the level after releasing the lock. Otherwise, lock
recursion can occur, most likely right after the splx(). An example:
nd6_slowtimo <- NET_LOCK()
timeout_run
softclock
softintr_dispatch
dosoftint
interrupt
On 22/12/16(Thu) 20:45, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 13:06 +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 12:45:37PM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> > > Anyways, OK for the diff below?
> >
> > OK bluhm@
> >
> > > diff --git sys/net/if_pflow.c sys/net/if_pflow.c
> > >
> Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 14:56:43 +0100
> From: Martin Pieuchot
>
> On 22/12/16(Thu) 10:45, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > On 22/12/16(Thu) 00:32, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > splassert: ip_output: want 1 have 0
> > > Starting stack trace...
> > > ip_output() at ip_output+0x7d
> > >
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 05:47:05PM +0100, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Building ld.so with clang on amd64 fails with undefined references
> to memset and memcpy. That is odd, since neither function appears
> in the source. Apparently clang optimizes the _dl_memset and
> _dl_bcopy functions into
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 13:06 +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 12:45:37PM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> > Anyways, OK for the diff below?
>
> OK bluhm@
>
> > diff --git sys/net/if_pflow.c sys/net/if_pflow.c
> > index 0df0b69fd8a..8592d98a743 100644
> > ---
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 10:40:48AM +0100, Franco Fichtner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Switching from net-snmp to OpenBSD's snmpd raised two
> issues and I'd like to know if they make sense to address:
>
> A pid file is missing. Would a patch for this be accepted?
Most probably not. We don't see the
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 12:08:23PM +0100, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> After ospfd here's a diff to make ospf6d refresh his view of an
> interface's MTU at runtime. This needs a fresh kernel.
>
> The parent should pass the IFINFO message to its children first, and
> then decide
Building ld.so with clang on amd64 fails with undefined references
to memset and memcpy. That is odd, since neither function appears
in the source. Apparently clang optimizes the _dl_memset and
_dl_bcopy functions into calls to memset and memcpy, respectively.
I tentatively propose to add
On 22/12/16(Thu) 10:45, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 22/12/16(Thu) 00:32, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > splassert: ip_output: want 1 have 0
> > Starting stack trace...
> > ip_output() at ip_output+0x7d
> > ipsp_process_done() at ipsp_process_done+0x2ad
> > esp_output_cb() at esp_output_cb+0x135
> >
On 22/12/16(Thu) 11:59, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> Some additional stack traces which run through nd6:
>
> splassert: sowakeup: want 1 have 0
> Starting stack trace...
> sowakeup(1,0,d09d8d63,d09c8abf,d03cfbb0) at sowakeup+0x43
> sowakeup(d95478ec,d954793c,d09d8be1,d378a4a0,d41150e0) at
On 22/12/16(Thu) 12:00, Theo Buehler wrote:
> Not sure if these have been reported. With a kernel freshly built from
> sources this morning, my dmesg is full of these:
>
> splassert: sorwakeup: want 1 have 0
> Starting stack trace...
> sorwakeup() at sorwakeup+0x3c
> soisconnected() at
On 22/12/16(Thu) 11:56, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> Getting a lot of these with 'dhclient iwm0'.
>
> splassert: sowakeup: want 1 have 0
> Starting stack trace...
> sowakeup(1,0,d09d8d63,d09c8abf,d03cfbb0) at sowakeup+0x43
>
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 07:51:03PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > This diff replaces the nd6_timer timeout and task with a timeout
> > proc.
>
> Can we wait until the experiment is complete? Until then I'd like
> to keep timeout_set_proc() only for timeout converted because they
> need the
Not sure if these have been reported. With a kernel freshly built from
sources this morning, my dmesg is full of these:
splassert: sorwakeup: want 1 have 0
Starting stack trace...
sorwakeup() at sorwakeup+0x3c
soisconnected() at soisconnected+0x6f
unp_connect2() at unp_connect2+0x62
Some additional stack traces which run through nd6:
splassert: sowakeup: want 1 have 0
Starting stack trace...
sowakeup(1,0,d09d8d63,d09c8abf,d03cfbb0) at sowakeup+0x43
sowakeup(d95478ec,d954793c,d09d8be1,d378a4a0,d41150e0) at sowakeup+0x43
sorwakeup(d95478ec,d0b57b50,d94bd000,0,2) at
Getting a lot of these with 'dhclient iwm0'.
splassert: sowakeup: want 1 have 0
Starting stack trace...
sowakeup(1,0,d09d8d63,d09c8abf,d03cfbb0) at sowakeup+0x43
sowakeup(d90431fc,d9043288,d09d8bd7,d3be1c00,d978ad00,f61cbd78,d978ad00,d03e5d6f,d90431fc)
at sowakeup+0x43
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 12:35:07PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 10/12/16(Sat) 11:08, Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
> > While I was playing around with the ip4 multicast code, I thought
> > I would attempt to make the membership data structure similar to that
> > of ip6. This means
On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 07:24:40PM +, Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I converted the igmp stats to use percpu counters. This work is
> basically the same as what dlg@ did for other parts of the stack.
> I looked at the diff and adjusted it for igmp.
ping
On 22/12/16(Thu) 00:32, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> splassert: ip_output: want 1 have 0
> Starting stack trace...
> ip_output() at ip_output+0x7d
> ipsp_process_done() at ipsp_process_done+0x2ad
> esp_output_cb() at esp_output_cb+0x135
> taskq_thread() at taskq_thread+0x6c
> end trace frame: 0x0,
21 matches
Mail list logo