Thanks Stuart!
Stuart Henderson writes:
> On 2021/03/09 07:41, Greg Steuck wrote:
>> ... which goes on for hours until I wake my desktop machine (lenny). I
>> know this doesn't sound related, but I observed this multiple times and
>> see no better correlation. The two machines are connected to
Thanks Todd. I'll pass your analysis on to Joachim.
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2021 14:14:33 -0700
From: Todd C. Miller
To: Mark Lumsden
Cc: tech@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: mg: Fix Coverity Scan warning: Insecure data handling
On Tue, 09 Mar 2021 20:14:19 +, Mark Lumsden wrote:
Here is a diff
With the update to perl v5.32, we get Unicode 13 in base, which means we
can update the table. This is the mechanical change from running the
gen_ctype_utf8.l script.
https://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode13.0.0
Comments, OK?
Index: share/locale/ctype/gen_ctype_utf8.pl
Here is a diff from Joachim Wiberg's version of mg.
"The strlcpy() function is guaranteed to never copy more than 'len - 1'
bytes, so there is no need to check if we copied more. This is a bogus
warning since the introduction of strlcpy()."
Tested and seems reasonable. ok?
Index: cinfo.c
Todd C. Miller wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Mar 2021 20:14:19 +, Mark Lumsden wrote:
>
> > Here is a diff from Joachim Wiberg's version of mg.
> >
> > "The strlcpy() function is guaranteed to never copy more than 'len - 1'
> > bytes, so there is no need to check if we copied more. This is a bogus
>
From Joachim Wiberg's version of mg.
"This patch makes sure to clear the status/echo line after killing and
switching buffers by name. Otherwise the kill/switch prompt lingers"
ok?
It also adds back a CVS tag on the first line of buffer.c that I
inadvertantly removed a while back.
Index:
On Tue, 09 Mar 2021 22:04:42 +0100, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Thanks a lot for figuring this out! I finally got around to looking
> at your patch. Once we have nul-terminated lines, appdstr() can
> be replaced with realloc() and strlcat().
I don't think your use of qlen is safe since it is
On Tue, 09 Mar 2021 20:14:19 +, Mark Lumsden wrote:
> Here is a diff from Joachim Wiberg's version of mg.
>
> "The strlcpy() function is guaranteed to never copy more than 'len - 1'
> bytes, so there is no need to check if we copied more. This is a bogus
> warning since the introduction of
Alex Karle:
> Looking deeper, there is a bug in quiz(6) for datfiles with multi-line
> answers.
>
> Specifically, the following quiz.db line:
>
> foo:\
> bar
>
> Is parsed into "foo:bar\n", which made it impossible to get right (since
> the comparison was expecting a newline).
I have weak evidence that my network connection may be disappearing as
my persistent ssh connections fall off during the same time. The cable
modem is probably playing some stupid games.
Greg Steuck writes:
> ... until starting to fail with:
>
> Mar 9 00:53:18 alix unbound: [40947:0] error:
Simple addition of VEB right before BRIDGE.
All text is copied from other already existing sections, i.e. link flag
handling from TPMR and the rest from BIDGE.
Contrary to BRIDGE, I deliberately added a synopsis for VEB such that
there's a simple overwie, especially since veb(4) currently does
Hi,
The verification of the https://ugos.ugm.ac.id certificate contains 2032
subject alt names which leads to the following error in LibreSSL.
# openssl s_client -connect ugos.ugm.ac.id:443
...
verify error:num=17:out of memory
...
The following diff sets the maximum number of SANs to the next
I send out an earlier version of this diff to Anindya with some positive
feedback. Instead of claiming another binding, why not make help, order
and view a toggle? I see no reason why this information should disappear
on the next input.
Seems to work fine in my testing.
OK?
martijn@
On Thu,
On 2021/03/09 07:41, Greg Steuck wrote:
> This setup worked for months until recently becoming temperamental. It
> would run for a few hours:
>
> Mar 8 23:17:00 alix unbound: [40947:0] info: start of service (unbound
> 1.13.0).
>
> ... until starting to fail with:
>
> Mar 9 00:53:18 alix
On Tue, 09 Mar 2021 17:53:06 +0100, Benjamin Baier wrote:
> Ping
I think that in do_clear_screen() full should not be set unless
neednl is 0. That is, we should only print the entire prompt if
the screen was actually cleared. Otherwise looks good to me.
- todd
Index: bin/ksh/vi.c
Ping
On Sat, 21 Nov 2020 18:59:25 +0200
Πάτερος Πέτρος wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am sending this because of an issue I had with a ported version of
> your ksh(1) on Linux (you can find the port at
> https://github.com/ibara/oksh), but everything I say here are also
> tested on a VM
Only .crl files need to be parsed first (the other file depend on the
certificate revocation list to be present). Instead of many loops over the
same fileset just do it twice. First for .crl and then for the other known
file types. This should save some CPU cycles.
--
:wq Claudio
Index: main.c
I configured unbound running on my LAN router (alix) to forward all
requests over TLS to a bunch of places with:
forward-zone:
name: "."
forward-tls-upstream: yes
# Quad9
forward-addr: 2620:fe::fe@853#dns.quad9.net
forward-addr: 9.9.9.9@853#dns.quad9.net
forward-addr:
This implements a new rate adaptation module for net80211, called "RA",
which resulted from a long discussion and exchanges of various diffs
between Christian Ehrhardt and myself, targeting problems with MiRA.
Tests with any of the various iwn(4) and iwm(4) devices are very welcome.
The iwn and
> Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 10:15:35 +0100
> From: Stefan Sperling
>
> On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 05:14:08PM -0800, Greg Steuck wrote:
> > I had an iwx working fine (modulo known issues) for a bit on amd64 current:
> >
> > iwx0 at pci0 dev 20 function 3 "Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201" rev 0x00, msix
> > iwx0:
On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 11:55:30PM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> This silently drops message if copyin() fails. Could we count them as
> `logstash_dropped??? too?
No, as there is no message. Userland made something wrong. At
least that is how I understand one of visa@'s remarks. The
On 08/03/21(Mon) 12:37, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 12:11:54PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> [...]
> > This diff targets a specific problem which is to make sure `ps_single'
> > dereferences are coherent if this value is being modified w/o KERNEL_LOCK().
> > It doesn't
On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 05:14:08PM -0800, Greg Steuck wrote:
> I had an iwx working fine (modulo known issues) for a bit on amd64 current:
>
> iwx0 at pci0 dev 20 function 3 "Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201" rev 0x00, msix
> iwx0: hw rev 0x350, fw ver 48.1335886879.0, address xxx
>
> Then for no discernible
On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 09:12:03AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just committed a malloc change that is interesting. It has been in
> snaps already for a while.
>
> It changes the malloc cache to be a little more friendly to the
> kernel, mallocs tendency to split large allocations
Hi,
I just committed a malloc change that is interesting. It has been in
snaps already for a while.
It changes the malloc cache to be a little more friendly to the
kernel, mallocs tendency to split large allocations into page-sized ones
was giving the kernel a hard time in some cases.
By
25 matches
Mail list logo
