Jesper Wallin wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 07:24:47PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> > this looks good. will commit soon.
> >
> > (one nit, i'll correct, is man page options are upper case first.)
>
> Sorry if this comes on as a bit pushy, but any news here? I don't know
> how 6.2-beta affects
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 07:24:47PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> this looks good. will commit soon.
>
> (one nit, i'll correct, is man page options are upper case first.)
Sorry if this comes on as a bit pushy, but any news here? I don't know
how 6.2-beta affects this, but maybe it would be nice to
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 07:24:47PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> this looks good. will commit soon.
>
> (one nit, i'll correct, is man page options are upper case first.)
Noted for future reference. Thanks!
Hi Ted,
Ted Unangst wrote on Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 07:42:39PM -0400:
> Jesper Wallin wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 09:52:22AM +0200, Martijn van Duren wrote:
>>> I've also been bitten by this a couple of times, but you can also solve
>>> this via the sensorsd framework, which is how I've done
Jesper Wallin wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 09:52:22AM +0200, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> > I've also been bitten by this a couple of times, but you can also solve
> > this via the sensorsd framework, which is how I've done it.
>
> Yeah, someone on IRC also suggested sensorsd or even ksh and a
Jesper Wallin wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 05:12:05PM +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> > Personally I'd also prefer having this in apmd(8) rather than some other
> > daemon or script. Some comments:
> >
> > You should pass optarg instead of errstr to error(). Either ways error()
> > will still
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 05:12:05PM +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> Personally I'd also prefer having this in apmd(8) rather than some other
> daemon or script. Some comments:
>
> You should pass optarg instead of errstr to error(). Either ways error()
> will still append since it uses err(3). This
Hi Jesper/all,
On Sun, 13 Aug 2017 14:13:42 +0200 Jesper Wallin wrote:
>
> ... someone on IRC also suggested sensorsd or even ksh and a
> cronjob. I personally find it a bit too ducttapey though, especially
> for a feature one would expect on a laptop.
For what its worth, below is an unpriv
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 11:21:03AM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> Klemens Nanni wrote:
> > > + case 'z':
> > > + autoaction = AUTO_SUSPEND;
> > > + autolimit = strtonum(optarg, 1, 100, );
> > > + if (errstr != NULL)
> > > +
Klemens Nanni wrote:
> > + case 'z':
> > + autoaction = AUTO_SUSPEND;
> > + autolimit = strtonum(optarg, 1, 100, );
> > + if (errstr != NULL)
> > + error("invalid percent: %s", errstr);
> > +
On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 02:13:42PM +0200, Jesper Wallin wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 09:52:22AM +0200, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> > I've also been bitten by this a couple of times, but you can also solve
> > this via the sensorsd framework, which is how I've done it.
>
> Yeah, someone on IRC
On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 09:52:22AM +0200, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> I've also been bitten by this a couple of times, but you can also solve
> this via the sensorsd framework, which is how I've done it.
Yeah, someone on IRC also suggested sensorsd or even ksh and a cronjob.
I personally find it a
Hello Jesper,
On 08/12/17 23:39, Jesper Wallin wrote:
> Hello tech@
>
> I've been stuck with fsck for way to many times now because of me
> forgetting to connect the AC power. This patch will add -z and -Z
> followed by the percentage. apmd will try to suspend or hibernate the
> system if the AC
Hello tech@
I've been stuck with fsck for way to many times now because of me
forgetting to connect the AC power. This patch will add -z and -Z
followed by the percentage. apmd will try to suspend or hibernate the
system if the AC is not connected and the estimated battery life goes
below the
14 matches
Mail list logo
