On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 10:37:08PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 25/03/16(Fri) 13:23, Ulf Brosziewski wrote:
> > Again, my mail client insisted on the "flowed" text format,
> > sorry. Here is a clean version of the diff.
>
> Tested with:
>
> pms0: Synaptics clickpad, firmware 8.0
>
>
On 25/03/16(Fri) 13:23, Ulf Brosziewski wrote:
> Again, my mail client insisted on the "flowed" text format,
> sorry. Here is a clean version of the diff.
Tested with:
pms0: Synaptics clickpad, firmware 8.0
In think this should go in, then we can polish it in-tree and wait for
On 2016-03-24 22.34.12 +0100, Ulf Brosziewski wrote:
> Are there any reviews, tests, OKs, or NOs pending?
I'll add on to the list of: no regressions. I do not have the applicable
harware to try the multitouch.
(My status is unchanged: the touch screen works fine until
suspend/resume, and then X
On 03/25/2016 01:53 PM, Theo Buehler wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 01:47:07PM +0100, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 10:34:12PM +0100, Ulf Brosziewski wrote:
>>> Are there any reviews, tests, OKs, or NOs pending? And if
>>> not, may I ask if someone knows a better way to make
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 01:47:07PM +0100, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 10:34:12PM +0100, Ulf Brosziewski wrote:
> > Are there any reviews, tests, OKs, or NOs pending? And if
> > not, may I ask if someone knows a better way to make progress
> > in this area? I'm at a loss here.
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 10:34:12PM +0100, Ulf Brosziewski wrote:
> Are there any reviews, tests, OKs, or NOs pending? And if
> not, may I ask if someone knows a better way to make progress
> in this area? I'm at a loss here. As far as I can see, I
> cannot offer a smaller diff; this one contains
Again, my mail client insisted on the "flowed" text format,
sorry. Here is a clean version of the diff.
Index: src/wsconscomm.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/xenocara/driver/xf86-input-synaptics/src/wsconscomm.c,v
retrieving revision 1.13
diff
On 24/03/16(Thu) 22:34, Ulf Brosziewski wrote:
> Are there any reviews, tests, OKs, or NOs pending? And if
> not, may I ask if someone knows a better way to make progress
> in this area? I'm at a loss here. As far as I can see, I
> cannot offer a smaller diff; this one contains the minimum
> that
Are there any reviews, tests, OKs, or NOs pending? And if
not, may I ask if someone knows a better way to make progress
in this area? I'm at a loss here. As far as I can see, I
cannot offer a smaller diff; this one contains the minimum
that technically makes sense. And as it just adds the basics,
