Le Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 12:36:22PM -0700, Todd C. Miller a écrit :
> On Sat, 26 Dec 2020 15:07:36 -0700, "Theo de Raadt" wrote:
>
> > Well in that case this should still be a multistep process.
> >
> > Add STAILQ
> >
> > Convert things, including everything in ports
> >
> > No diff should change
On Tue, 29 Dec 2020 12:36:22 -0700, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> That looks something like this. I used the FreeBSD macros which
> incorporate STAILQ_NEXT and STAILQ_FIRST but I can inline things
> if someone has a strong opinion on this.
Here is the updated man page. The table doesn't reflect
On Sat, 26 Dec 2020 15:07:36 -0700, "Theo de Raadt" wrote:
> Well in that case this should still be a multistep process.
>
> Add STAILQ
>
> Convert things, including everything in ports
>
> No diff should change a line of code before it's time
That looks something like this. I used the FreeBSD
Denis Fondras:
> This diff renames SIMPLEQ_* to STAILQ_* in /usr/src/sys/sys to unify with
> FreeBSD and Linux.
>
> I added aliases at the end of queue.h to avoid breaking base too much. they
> will
> be removed as soon as diff 2,3,4,5,6,7 are commited.
>
> net/sniproxy has a patch to define
Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Theo de Raadt:
>
> > What is lacking in this converstation is the justification.
> > Why?
>
> Providing STAILQ in OpenBSD will simplify porting to OpenBSD.
> (Reality check: There is one port affected by this.)
>
> Switching OpenBSD to STAILQ will simplify
Theo de Raadt:
> What is lacking in this converstation is the justification.
> Why?
Providing STAILQ in OpenBSD will simplify porting to OpenBSD.
(Reality check: There is one port affected by this.)
Switching OpenBSD to STAILQ will simplify porting from OpenBSD.
(There are three or four FreeBSD
Todd C. Miller wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Dec 2020 10:45:21 -0700, "Theo de Raadt" wrote:
>
> > > This diff renames SIMPLEQ_* to STAILQ_* in /usr/src/sys/sys to unify
> > > with FreeBSD and Linux.
> >
> > More than half the stuff being touched doesn't exist in FreeBSD or Linux.
> >
> > SIMPLEQ_ goes
On 2020/12/26 18:39, Denis Fondras wrote:
> Le Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 06:23:41PM +0100, Mark Kettenis a écrit :
> > > > This diff renames SIMPLEQ_* to STAILQ_* in /usr/src/sys/sys to unify
> > > > with FreeBSD and Linux.
> > > >
> > > > I added aliases at the end of queue.h to avoid breaking base
On Sat, 26 Dec 2020 10:45:21 -0700, "Theo de Raadt" wrote:
> > This diff renames SIMPLEQ_* to STAILQ_* in /usr/src/sys/sys to unify
> > with FreeBSD and Linux.
>
> More than half the stuff being touched doesn't exist in FreeBSD or Linux.
>
> SIMPLEQ_ goes back to 97.
STAILQ goes back to 96.
Le Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 06:55:09PM +0100, Mark Kettenis a écrit :
> > Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2020 18:39:36 +0100
> > From: Denis Fondras
> >
> > Le Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 06:23:41PM +0100, Mark Kettenis a écrit :
> > > > > This diff renames SIMPLEQ_* to STAILQ_* in /usr/src/sys/sys to unify
> > > > >
> Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2020 18:39:36 +0100
> From: Denis Fondras
>
> Le Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 06:23:41PM +0100, Mark Kettenis a écrit :
> > > > This diff renames SIMPLEQ_* to STAILQ_* in /usr/src/sys/sys to unify
> > > > with FreeBSD and Linux.
> > > >
> > > > I added aliases at the end of queue.h
Denis Fondras wrote:
> Le Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 06:23:41PM +0100, Mark Kettenis a écrit :
> > > > This diff renames SIMPLEQ_* to STAILQ_* in /usr/src/sys/sys to unify
> > > > with FreeBSD and Linux.
> > > >
> > > > I added aliases at the end of queue.h to avoid breaking base too much.
> > > >
> This diff renames SIMPLEQ_* to STAILQ_* in /usr/src/sys/sys to unify
> with FreeBSD and Linux.
More than half the stuff being touched doesn't exist in FreeBSD or Linux.
SIMPLEQ_ goes back to 97.
Why is this the direction to go???
Denis, you appear to be making an arbitrary decision and not
Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 26/12/20(Sat) 18:23, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > [...]
> > NetBSD and Solaris both provide SIMPLEQ_* and STAILQ_*. I'm not sure
> > removing one in favour of the other is helpful.
>
> It would be helpful to provide both set of macros for some time to ease
> the
Le Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 06:23:41PM +0100, Mark Kettenis a écrit :
> > > This diff renames SIMPLEQ_* to STAILQ_* in /usr/src/sys/sys to unify with
> > > FreeBSD and Linux.
> > >
> > > I added aliases at the end of queue.h to avoid breaking base too much.
> > > they will
> > > be removed as soon
On 26/12/20(Sat) 18:23, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> [...]
> NetBSD and Solaris both provide SIMPLEQ_* and STAILQ_*. I'm not sure
> removing one in favour of the other is helpful.
It would be helpful to provide both set of macros for some time to ease
the transition/conversion.
Then we can decide if
> Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2020 16:40:15 +0100
> From: Christian Weisgerber
>
> Denis Fondras:
>
> > This diff renames SIMPLEQ_* to STAILQ_* in /usr/src/sys/sys to unify with
> > FreeBSD and Linux.
> >
> > I added aliases at the end of queue.h to avoid breaking base too much. they
> > will
> > be
Denis Fondras:
> This diff renames SIMPLEQ_* to STAILQ_* in /usr/src/sys/sys to unify with
> FreeBSD and Linux.
>
> I added aliases at the end of queue.h to avoid breaking base too much. they
> will
> be removed as soon as diff 2,3,4,5,6,7 are commited.
We'll need to run a ports bulk build
I read through all the diffs and they look fine to me. My only
comment is that it would be nice if the whitespace changes to queue.h
were done separately as they makes it more difficult to see the
important changes.
I was pleasntly surprised to find the nothing in the tree reaches
into the data
mpi@ reminded me I had this diff cooking.
This diff renames SIMPLEQ_* to STAILQ_* in /usr/src/sys/sys to unify with
FreeBSD and Linux.
I added aliases at the end of queue.h to avoid breaking base too much. they will
be removed as soon as diff 2,3,4,5,6,7 are commited.
net/sniproxy has a patch
20 matches
Mail list logo
