On 22.10.2021. 16:57, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Claudio Jeker wrote:
>
>> For ospfd tests you want to make sure that some of the ospf packets need
>> fragmenting. So this needs a sizeable network to hit this.
>
> Yes, as I remember, the problems only related to fragments of large
> packets.
>
>
On Oct 22, 2021, at 7:55 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> On 2021/10/22 11:25, Jan Klemkow wrote:
>> this diff add hardware checksum offloading for the receive path of
>> ixl(4) interfaces.
>
> Would be good to have this tested with NFS if anyone has a way to do so.
> nics are probably better
On 22.10.2021. 16:53, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 04:45:09PM +0200, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
>> On 22.10.2021. 16:09, Florian Obser wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 22 October 2021 13:55:20 CEST, Stuart Henderson
>>> wrote:
On 2021/10/22 11:25, Jan Klemkow wrote:
> this diff add
Claudio Jeker wrote:
> For ospfd tests you want to make sure that some of the ospf packets need
> fragmenting. So this needs a sizeable network to hit this.
Yes, as I remember, the problems only related to fragments of large
packets.
These tests are too narrow and the results inconclusive.
the nfs issues related to fragments being incorrectly labelled as
checksummed. I am vague on whether this was hardware incorrectly indicating
checksum valid in damaged packets. of course, that was nothing compared
to the astoundingly nasty v6 checksum hardware bug in tht(4)...
Hrvoje Popovski
On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 04:45:09PM +0200, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> On 22.10.2021. 16:09, Florian Obser wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 22 October 2021 13:55:20 CEST, Stuart Henderson
> > wrote:
> >> On 2021/10/22 11:25, Jan Klemkow wrote:
> >>> this diff add hardware checksum offloading for the receive
On 22.10.2021. 16:22, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> Stuart Henderson(s...@spacehopper.org) on 2021.10.22 12:55:20 +0100:
>> On 2021/10/22 11:25, Jan Klemkow wrote:
>>> this diff add hardware checksum offloading for the receive path of
>>> ixl(4) interfaces.
>>
>> Would be good to have this tested with
On 22.10.2021. 16:09, Florian Obser wrote:
>
>
> On 22 October 2021 13:55:20 CEST, Stuart Henderson
> wrote:
>> On 2021/10/22 11:25, Jan Klemkow wrote:
>>> this diff add hardware checksum offloading for the receive path of
>>> ixl(4) interfaces.
>>
>> Would be good to have this tested with NFS
Stuart Henderson(s...@spacehopper.org) on 2021.10.22 12:55:20 +0100:
> On 2021/10/22 11:25, Jan Klemkow wrote:
> > this diff add hardware checksum offloading for the receive path of
> > ixl(4) interfaces.
>
> Would be good to have this tested with NFS if anyone has a way to do so.
> nics are
On 22.10.2021. 13:55, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2021/10/22 11:25, Jan Klemkow wrote:
>> this diff add hardware checksum offloading for the receive path of
>> ixl(4) interfaces.
>
> Would be good to have this tested with NFS if anyone has a way to do so.
> nics are probably better now but I'm
On 22 October 2021 13:55:20 CEST, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>On 2021/10/22 11:25, Jan Klemkow wrote:
>> this diff add hardware checksum offloading for the receive path of
>> ixl(4) interfaces.
>
>Would be good to have this tested with NFS if anyone has a way to do so.
>nics are probably better
On 22.10.2021. 13:39, Jan Klemkow wrote:
> Hi Hrvoje,
>
> Thats because, you only see this flags, if the checksum offloading is
> enabled for "sending". I'm still working/debugging on the sending side.
> Thus, I just send a diff with the receiving part for now.
>
> You can see if its working
Hi,
this diff add hardware checksum offloading for the receive path of
ixl(4) interfaces.
Tested on:
ixl1 at pci3 dev 0 function 1 "Intel X710 SFP+" rev 0x02: port 1, FW 6.0.48442
API 1.7, msix, 8 queues, address 40:a6:b7:02:38:3d
OK?
Index: dev/pci/if_ixl.c
On 2021/10/22 11:25, Jan Klemkow wrote:
> this diff add hardware checksum offloading for the receive path of
> ixl(4) interfaces.
Would be good to have this tested with NFS if anyone has a way to do so.
nics are probably better now but I'm pretty sure we have had problems
with NFS and offloading
On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 01:39:47PM +0200, Jan Klemkow wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 12:01:41PM +0200, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> > On 22.10.2021. 11:25, Jan Klemkow wrote:
> > > this diff add hardware checksum offloading for the receive path of
> > > ixl(4) interfaces.
> > >
> > > Tested on:
> >
On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 12:01:41PM +0200, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> On 22.10.2021. 11:25, Jan Klemkow wrote:
> > this diff add hardware checksum offloading for the receive path of
> > ixl(4) interfaces.
> >
> > Tested on:
> > ixl1 at pci3 dev 0 function 1 "Intel X710 SFP+" rev 0x02: port 1, FW
>
On 22.10.2021. 11:25, Jan Klemkow wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this diff add hardware checksum offloading for the receive path of
> ixl(4) interfaces.
>
> Tested on:
> ixl1 at pci3 dev 0 function 1 "Intel X710 SFP+" rev 0x02: port 1, FW
> 6.0.48442 API 1.7, msix, 8 queues, address 40:a6:b7:02:38:3d
>
>
17 matches
Mail list logo
