Using SLIST() instead of TAILQ() is a step towards using lock-less
lists.
As found in my previous attempts the interface list cannot be protected
by a mutex as long a if_enqueue() might grab the KERNEL_LOCK(). So I'm
heading towards using SRPL_*().
Ok?
Index: net/if_bridge.c
On 18/12/18(Tue) 12:13, Denis Fondras wrote:
> Here is a serie of diffs to enable MPLSv6, MPLS transport over IPv6.
Nice!
> First diff : allow mpe(4) to handle IPv6 trafic.
Comments below
> Index: net/if_ethersubr.c
> ===
> RCS
On 20/12/18(Thu) 11:35, David Gwynne wrote:
> My last attempt in "let etherip(4) output directly to the ip stack"
> didn't go so well. This one at least doesn't break bridge(4) on
> Ethernet.
It breaks it on mpw(4).
> This diff effectively turns if_enqueue into a per interface function
>
Hi Hiltjo,
Hiltjo Posthuma wrote on Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 03:34:12PM +0100:
> Shouldn't these kind of diffs be OK'd by other developers before
> committing though?
Not necessarily. When a developer focusses on work in a particular
area and takes responsibility to fix anything that breaks there,
On Fri, 21 Dec 2018 00:10:10 +0100, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> I see the point, and it makes sense to me.
>
> So in case people want a sensible default for "-O style=" as suggested,
> where should the file go?
>
> Maybe /usr/share/misc/mandoc.css ?
That would be fine with me. I definitely think it
On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 01:58:16PM +, Mark Lumsden wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Dec 2018, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
>
> > Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2018 13:43:32 +0100
> > From: Hiltjo Posthuma
> > To: Mark Lumsden
> > Cc: Leonid Bobrov , tech@openbsd.org
> > Subject: Re: mg: Delete region
> >
> > On Thu, Dec
On Sun, 23 Dec 2018, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2018 13:43:32 +0100
From: Hiltjo Posthuma
To: Mark Lumsden
Cc: Leonid Bobrov , tech@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: mg: Delete region
On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 06:44:15AM +, Mark Lumsden wrote:
hmm, you are correct. I'm trying to
On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 06:44:15AM +, Mark Lumsden wrote:
> hmm, you are correct. I'm trying to remember which machine I tested
> on that made me come to that conclusion.
>
> On Thu, 20 Dec 2018, Leonid Bobrov wrote:
>
> > Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2018 06:43:02 +0200
> > From: Leonid Bobrov
> >
On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 10:05:01AM +, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> unless you're trying somehow to emphasise that both types of address are
> supported, you could simplify the text to just:
>
> The
> .Ar dest-address
> is used to find ...
>
Thank you for your input.
Index:
On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 10:28:30AM +0100, Denis Fondras wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 11:42:36PM +0100, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> > I have no clue about MPLS, so this feedback is code-wise only:
> >
> > Did you consider using more AF agnostic code for parsing the IP address?
> >
>
> You are
On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 11:42:36PM +0100, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> I have no clue about MPLS, so this feedback is code-wise only:
>
> Did you consider using more AF agnostic code for parsing the IP address?
>
You are right, it is simpler. Thank you for the clue :)
Updated diff :
Index:
11 matches
Mail list logo