On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 2:46 AM, Stuart Henderson
wrote:
> On 2010/08/25 11:57, Gregory Edigarov wrote:
>> On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 07:30:25 +0200
>> Jakob Schlyter wrote:
>>
>> > On 23 aug 2010, at 04.16, patrick keshishian wrote:
>> >
>> > > Is the idea to replace bind altogether from base? If so, m
On 8/24/10, Miod Vallat wrote:
>> the little operating system we wrote eventually panic'd (overflowed
>> heap); standalone ufs.c implementation we've used leaks f_buf
>> everytime ufs_open fails
>
> This is correct, but you may be leaking fp->f_blk[] as well. What about
> this instead?
yup i thi
On 25/08/10(Wed) 18:29, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
> Hmm. I can't reproduce this.
>
> What arch are you using? -current?
>
> I do, in uxterm:
>
> $ tmux kill-server
> $ export LANG=en_US.UTF-8
> $ tmux new
> $ echo $LANG
> en_US.UTF-8
> $ mutt
>
> And open a UTF-8 email, which appears fine, including
I think the problem I'm seeing is just a pidgin bug - python does define
_XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED on Linux but it doesn't seem that it needs to on
OpenBSD so I don't think pidgin should rely on it.
FreeBSD/NetBSD ports don't build the console UI for pidgin so possibly
it just hasn't been tested with
Hmm. I can't reproduce this.
What arch are you using? -current?
I do, in uxterm:
$ tmux kill-server
$ export LANG=en_US.UTF-8
$ tmux new
$ echo $LANG
en_US.UTF-8
$ mutt
And open a UTF-8 email, which appears fine, including wide characters.
Can you give me the exact steps you are using?
On We
On 25/08/10(Wed) 17:00, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
> Show me the output from "tmux lsc" and "tmux showw -g|grep utf8" with
> the client attached.
>
a...@goiaba $ tmux lsc
/dev/ttyp1: 0 [80x53 xterm-256color] (utf8)
a...@goiaba $ tmux showw -g|grep utf8
utf8 on
Show me the output from "tmux lsc" and "tmux showw -g|grep utf8" with
the client attached.
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 07:40:22PM +0530, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 25/08/10(Wed) 09:32, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
> > And now avec widechar man pages and MLINKs (no other changes).
> > [...]
>
Currently rarpd can only listen on all or one interface, the
following lets multiple interfaces be specified like dhcpd.
Index: rarpd.8
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/rarpd/rarpd.8,v
retrieving revision 1.17
diff -u -p -r1.17 rarpd.8
Halk Danslari, Jazz Dans, Klasik Bale,
Modern Dans, Salon Danslari...
Arjantin Tango, Bachata, Cha Cha, Garliston,
Disco, Flamenko, Foxtrot, Hip Hop, Mambo,
Merenque, Oryantal, Quickstep, Rap, Reggae,
Rock'n Roll, Rumba, Salsa, Samba, Sirtaki,
Swing, Tango, Tap Dans, Twist,
Vals, Viyana Valsi
www
Hi,
On 25/08/10(Wed) 09:32, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
> And now avec widechar man pages and MLINKs (no other changes).
> [...]
I've tested mutt, tig and ncmpc on amd64, and they all work fine
in a standard xterm. However, when I use any of the three apps in
a tmux session (tmux -u) I get some stra
On Wednesday 25 August 2010 09:50:48 Gregory Edigarov wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 13:00:27 +0200
>
> Henning Brauer wrote:
> > * Gregory Edigarov [2010-08-25 11:03]:
> > > There is something I never understand: why change more for less?
> > > i.e. why change bind which is feature reach and matur
* Gregory Edigarov [2010-08-25 15:54]:
> why only nsd to the base, and not unbound?
hasn't been done yet. as simple as that.
neither has bind been removed yet.
--
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Se
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 13:00:27 +0200
Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Gregory Edigarov [2010-08-25 11:03]:
> > There is something I never understand: why change more for less?
> > i.e. why change bind which is feature reach and mature for
> > nsd/unbound, that doesn't have 2/3 of bind features.
>
> beca
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 09:27:55AM +0100, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 10:01:49AM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 08:48:05AM +0100, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 11:05:46PM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > > > On
* Gregory Edigarov [2010-08-25 11:03]:
> There is something I never understand: why change more for less?
> i.e. why change bind which is feature reach and mature for nsd/unbound,
> that doesn't have 2/3 of bind features.
because bind is a misdesigned piece of shit.
--
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 11:57:36AM +0300, Gregory Edigarov wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 07:30:25 +0200
> Jakob Schlyter wrote:
>
> > On 23 aug 2010, at 04.16, patrick keshishian wrote:
> >
> > > Is the idea to replace bind altogether from base? If so, my initial
> > searching shows NSD doesn't
On 2010/08/25 11:57, Gregory Edigarov wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 07:30:25 +0200
> Jakob Schlyter wrote:
>
> > On 23 aug 2010, at 04.16, patrick keshishian wrote:
> >
> > > Is the idea to replace bind altogether from base? If so, my initial
> > searching shows NSD doesn't support caching nor vi
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 07:30:25 +0200
Jakob Schlyter wrote:
> On 23 aug 2010, at 04.16, patrick keshishian wrote:
>
> > Is the idea to replace bind altogether from base? If so, my initial
> searching shows NSD doesn't support caching nor views (although, my
> googling skills suck). Are these being
On 2010/08/25 09:27, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
> >
> > The configure test run is more or less:
> >
> > #define _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED
> > #include
> >
> > int
> > main ()
> > {
> > #ifndef get_wch
> > # error get_wch not found!
> > #endif
> > ;
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > conftest.c:126:8: erro
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 10:01:49AM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 08:48:05AM +0100, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 11:05:46PM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 01:04:25PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> > > > Land
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 09:56:03AM +0200, Jakob Schlyter wrote:
> hi,
>
> I'd like some advice how to set the default configuration for NSD in OpenBSD.
> Some background information:
>
> - NSD stores all zone data in a database, nsd.db. This file is opened
> read-only by nsd(8), while running chr
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 08:48:05AM +0100, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 11:05:46PM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 01:04:25PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> > > Landry Breuil wrote:
> > >
> > > > > http://nicm.ath.cx/~nicholas/ncurs
hi,
I'd like some advice how to set the default configuration for NSD in OpenBSD.
Some background information:
- NSD stores all zone data in a database, nsd.db. This file is opened
read-only by nsd(8), while running chrooted in /var/nsd.
- Incoming zone transfers are written to ixfr.db by nsd(8),
Hi
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 11:05:46PM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 01:04:25PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> > Landry Breuil wrote:
> >
> > > > http://nicm.ath.cx/~nicholas/ncursesw.tar.gz
> > >
> > > I'll run a bulk with it if noone beats me to it.
> >
> >
24 matches
Mail list logo
