I think reordering and missing arguments etc is fine, but we shouldn't
add the missing prototypes until we are adding documentation for them as
well. Can you send a diff with just the fixes for the current prototypes
first?
Thanks
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:55:38PM +0100, Fabian Raetz wrote:
>
On 2015-02-17 08:06 PM, John Merriam wrote:
I definitely agree that the silliness of checking a version string to
possibly use some exotic or non-standard feature of a particular
flavor of a particular family of shells is not a good idea when
writing a shell script. If you can't do what you wa
On 2/17/2015 7:40 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
"Ted Unangst" writes:
[...]
So let's return to the top. What does "PD KSH" in KSH_VERSION mean? What does
one do differently if that string is present or missing?
sigh
pdksh is not the same thing as ksh88 or ksh93. A
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 11:26:53AM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> a compromise could be to advertise checksum offload to the stack,
> pass it on to the hardware for small frames but have the driver do
> it in software for the big ones?
greetings,
below are two diffs. the first allows re(4) chips to
it looks like it reads the DCSR register and then keeps everything
except the MPS field.
this might cause it to erronously consider the mps to be much bigger
than 2048, which in turn could prevent it from setting it correctly.
i dont actually have one of these chips. can someone give it a spin?
Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
> "Ted Unangst" writes:
>
> [...]
>
> >> > So let's return to the top. What does "PD KSH" in KSH_VERSION mean? What
> >> > does
> >> > one do differently if that string is present or missing?
> >>
> >> sigh
> >>
> >> pdksh is not the same thing as ksh88 or ksh9
"Ted Unangst" writes:
[...]
>> > So let's return to the top. What does "PD KSH" in KSH_VERSION mean? What
>> > does
>> > one do differently if that string is present or missing?
>>
>> sigh
>>
>> pdksh is not the same thing as ksh88 or ksh93. And not the same thing as
>> mksh, which has grew f
Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
> "Ted Unangst" writes:
>
> > Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
> >> Tristan Le Guern writes:
> >>
> >> > On 02/16/2015 05:22 PM, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> >> >> There are scripts that use KSH_VERSION to determine whether they
> >> >> are being run under ksh or a Bou
"Ted Unangst" writes:
> Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
>> Tristan Le Guern writes:
>>
>> > On 02/16/2015 05:22 PM, Todd C. Miller wrote:
>> >> There are scripts that use KSH_VERSION to determine whether they
>> >> are being run under ksh or a Bourne shell. That seems like a
>> >> reasonable t
Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
> Tristan Le Guern writes:
>
> > On 02/16/2015 05:22 PM, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> >> There are scripts that use KSH_VERSION to determine whether they
> >> are being run under ksh or a Bourne shell. That seems like a
> >> reasonable thing to do. I don't really care
Hi tech@,
below is a diff which
1) adds the following prototypes from event.h to event(3):
- event_reinit
- event_set_log_callback
- event_get_version
- event_get_method
- event_base_new
- event_base_priority_init
- bufferevent_priority_set
- bufferevent_setcb
- bufferevent_se
On 02/17/15 08:52, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
...
Shutting down stuff like pflogd and syslogd before the system
is actually going down might even be harmful.
you mean...like maybe when doing an upgrade where the newly installed
binaries are not compatible with the running kernel?
Considering the n
Tristan Le Guern writes:
> On 02/16/2015 05:22 PM, Todd C. Miller wrote:
>> There are scripts that use KSH_VERSION to determine whether they
>> are being run under ksh or a Bourne shell. That seems like a
>> reasonable thing to do. I don't really care what the version
>> number is set to. Usin
On 02/16/2015 05:22 PM, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> There are scripts that use KSH_VERSION to determine whether they
> are being run under ksh or a Bourne shell. That seems like a
> reasonable thing to do. I don't really care what the version
> number is set to. Using the OpenBSD version seems reaso
> I see how a clean shutdown might matter for, say, postgres.
> But what is the point in shutting down cron, sshd, ntpd, or unbound
> right before the system is going down anyway?
>
> Shutting down stuff like pflogd and syslogd before the system
> is actually going down might even be harmful.
>
>
Hi,
Antoine Jacoutot wrote on Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 02:24:56PM +0100:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 01:20:03PM +, Craig Skinner wrote:
>> stopping base daemons: cron spamlogd spamd sshd ntpd unbound
>> nsd pflogd syslogd.
>> syncing disks... done
> I cooked a patch for that a few months ago (ac
On 2015-02-17 Tue 14:24 PM |, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 01:20:03PM +, Craig Skinner wrote:
> > Produces (on 5.6 release) - with start up order reversed:
> >
> > # halt -p
> > stopping package daemons: greyscanner postfix sshguard.
> > stopping base daemons: cron spamlog
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 01:20:03PM +, Craig Skinner wrote:
> Produces (on 5.6 release) - with start up order reversed:
>
> # halt -p
> stopping package daemons: greyscanner postfix sshguard.
> stopping base daemons: cron spamlogd spamd sshd ntpd unbound nsd pflogd
> syslogd.
> syncing disks..
Produces (on 5.6 release) - with start up order reversed:
# halt -p
stopping package daemons: greyscanner postfix sshguard.
stopping base daemons: cron spamlogd spamd sshd ntpd unbound nsd pflogd syslogd.
syncing disks... done
Index: rc
===
On 02/17/15 09:07, Ted Unangst wrote:
It's sometimes helpful to run ftp -o - http://somwhat/ for debugging
purposes, but the progress bar gets in the way and makes it ugly. Even with -V
to disable verbose, it still prints progress. Add -M (complement of -m) to
always turn off progress.
I'm alwa
On 2015-02-16 Mon 09:22 AM |, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> There are scripts that use KSH_VERSION to determine whether they
> are being run under ksh or a Bourne shell. That seems like a
> reasonable thing to do. I don't really care what the version
> number is set to.
Korn scripts here that drive du
On 2015/02/17 01:01, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> This updates to the head of the unbound tree, adding Ilya Bakulin's code to
> support unbound-control over a unix domain socket rather than SSL. I don't
> see many standard cases needing the SSL socket any more, so I've removed
> the code from the rc.d
i like.
ok by me fwiw.
> On 17 Feb 2015, at 6:07 pm, Ted Unangst wrote:
>
> It's sometimes helpful to run ftp -o - http://somwhat/ for debugging
> purposes, but the progress bar gets in the way and makes it ugly. Even with -V
> to disable verbose, it still prints progress. Add -M (complement of
It's sometimes helpful to run ftp -o - http://somwhat/ for debugging
purposes, but the progress bar gets in the way and makes it ugly. Even with -V
to disable verbose, it still prints progress. Add -M (complement of -m) to
always turn off progress.
Index: ftp.1
===
24 matches
Mail list logo
