On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 07:57:09PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Florian Obser wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 12:15:34AM +0100, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 10:19:47PM +0100, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> > > > With that, my initial case is no longer misleading; alternativel
Florian Obser wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 12:15:34AM +0100, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 10:19:47PM +0100, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> > > With that, my initial case is no longer misleading; alternatively, I
> > > can implement the dash semantic, but that's another diff.
> >
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 12:15:34AM +0100, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 10:19:47PM +0100, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> > With that, my initial case is no longer misleading; alternatively, I
> > can implement the dash semantic, but that's another diff.
> Hm, that makes the default setup
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 10:19:47PM +0100, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> With that, my initial case is no longer misleading; alternatively, I
> can implement the dash semantic, but that's another diff.
Hm, that makes the default setup (no /etc/unwind.conf, empty
unwind_flags) always print a warning, which
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 12:04:47PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > As our ifconfig(8) man page says we support it, and route(8) also
> > supports it, I prefer fixing inet6 netmask.
>
> accepting a netmask also requires thinking about the behaviour in the
> discontig case (surely that means detectin
Hi,
Although ifconfig(8) checks it already, contiguous inet netmask
should be enforced by the kernel. Currently the routing table does
not support non-contiguous netmask, but we should error out early
during interface ioctl(2).
ok?
bluhm
Index: netinet/in.c
Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 18 2019, Benjamin Baier wrote:
> > Hi, found this.
>
> No idea why I commented this out instead of just deleting it. We're not
> keeping old ioctls in other places. Committed, thanks.
yes, that was a weird style.
On Mon, Nov 18 2019, Benjamin Baier wrote:
> Hi, found this.
No idea why I commented this out instead of just deleting it. We're not
keeping old ioctls in other places. Committed, thanks.
> -- Ben
>
> Index: vndioctl.h
> ===
> RC
Hi, found this.
-- Ben
Index: vndioctl.h
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/vndioctl.h,v
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -p -r1.10 vndioctl.h
--- vndioctl.h 14 Dec 2016 18:59:12 - 1.10
+++ vndioctl.h 18 Nov 2019 20:11:50 -00
I gave unwind.conf(5) a read and wanted to test the following:
$ echo preference dhcp | unwind -vnf-
preference { DoT forwarder recursor dhcp stub }
First, I thought unwind had a parser bug and would ignore my preference,
but turns out it simply does not treat "-" as standard inpu
On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 12:36:49PM +0100, Marcus Glocker wrote:
> While recently testing UDL on XHCI I faced a lot of USB timeouts, and
> therefore screen rendering issues.
> The reason is that XHCI currently only supports single bulk transfers
> up to 64k, while UDL can schedule a bulk transfer u
Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 09:58:34AM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > how about the text "use prefixlen instead of netmask for inet6"
>
> Much better error message, I have changed my diff.
>
> But we still have to decide whether we want to fix or disable inet6
> netmask.
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 09:58:34AM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> how about the text "use prefixlen instead of netmask for inet6"
Much better error message, I have changed my diff.
But we still have to decide whether we want to fix or disable inet6
netmask. Man page in FreeBSD says (Inet only.),
Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> + if (which == MASK)
> + errx(1, "inet6 needs prefixlen, not netmask");
needs?
you can configure an inet6 without prefixlen, and one is inferred.
how about the text "use prefixlen instead of netmask for inet6"
Alexander Bluhm(alexander.bl...@gmx.net) on 2019.11.18 16:31:05 +0100:
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 11:14:45PM +0100, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> > The alternative is to not allow netmask for ipv6 and only / and
> > prefixlen
> > . Why support such a crazy way of specifying the mask?
>
> We can also d
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 11:14:45PM +0100, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> The alternative is to not allow netmask for ipv6 and only / and
> prefixlen
> . Why support such a crazy way of specifying the mask?
We can also do it the other way around and forbid ifconfig inet6
netmask.
> In route we removed
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 01:23:27PM +0100, Renaud Allard wrote:
>
>
> On 11/18/19 10:08 AM, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
>
> > A configuration parameter could be accomplished through an optional symlink
> > /etc/_sysupgrade that the sysadmin can create to point at the installation's
> > sysupgrade direc
Hi,
this is only a minor fix. The '-t' flag forces iked to use NAT-traversal on UDP
port 4500. Currently it enables NATT only for IKE, not for the resulting
ESP SAs. The diff enables ESP NATT when iked NATT is enforced.
ok?
diff --git a/sbin/iked/ikev2.c b/sbin/iked/ikev2.c
index bd22bda0255..3f
Hello,
if I didn't overlook the function, there's extra lines in there.
Please see the patch below.
diff --git usr.bin/ssh/ssh-pkcs11-client.c usr.bin/ssh/ssh-pkcs11-client.c
index 20284d98ecf..44065df1a96 100644
--- usr.bin/ssh/ssh-pkcs11-client.c
+++ usr.bin/ssh/ssh-pkcs11-client.c
@@ -230,9 +
On 11/18/19 10:08 AM, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
A configuration parameter could be accomplished through an optional symlink
/etc/_sysupgrade that the sysadmin can create to point at the installation's
sysupgrade directory. The sysupgrade script would test -s /etc/_sysupgrade
and if there is a sym
On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 11:08:49AM +, Raf Czlonka wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 10:23:38AM GMT, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 08:31:00AM +, Raf Czlonka wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Pretty straightforward - comma snuck in inside the quoted book title.
> >
> >
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 04:00:29AM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > iwm0: hw rev 0x310, fw ver 34.-1169155311.0, address 90:78:41:39:57:8d
> >
> > I don't know yet what's up with that. Also happens on -17 firmware.
> > The number we show for -34 firmware on 8260 looks OK though.
>
> It's printed
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 10:32:43AM +0100, Renaud Allard wrote:
>
>
> On 11/13/19 11:51 PM, Renaud Allard wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 12/11/2019 19:02, Renaud Allard wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 12/11/2019 08:29, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Renaud, please test it for me like this:
> >>>
> >>> s
On 17/11/2019 13:44, Remi Locherer wrote:
> Yes, I'll send a separate diff for that later.
>
> OK for the new diff?
Works for me.
G
24 matches
Mail list logo
