Hello Gregory
,please find my responses in line
On Tue 25 Sep 2018, 15:54 Gregory Edigarov, wrote:
>
>
> the whole discussion here reminds me somewhat about my idea I wanted to
> realize some time ago:
> suppose we have an imaginary "fast" router, which does hardware
> assisted forwarding, and
On 22.09.18 17:11, Tom Smyth wrote:
Hello Stuart,
Thanks for the feedback , I have responded to your feedback in line,
On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 at 10:07, Stuart Henderson wrote:
Interesting idea but I think the method you're suggesting puts you at
higher risk of things *not* reaching their
Hello Stuart,
Thanks for the feedback , I have responded to your feedback in line,
On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 at 10:07, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
>
> Interesting idea but I think the method you're suggesting puts you at
> higher risk of things *not* reaching their destination - if you have
> good and
On 2018/09/22 09:21, Tom Smyth wrote:
> I like the NFsen idea, however I think for a simple eyeball ISP we could
> be able to achieve it by adding a default + exceptions summarisation
> to openBGPd ( I would rather not create more dependencies on our BGP
> )
> I want to install the minimum number
case...
On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 at 09:11, Remi Locherer wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 08:22:52AM +0100, Tom Smyth wrote:
> > OpenBGPd Feature Request / Question if the Feature Request
> > is something the community would use ?
> >
> > Background,
> > Ideally
On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 08:22:52AM +0100, Tom Smyth wrote:
> OpenBGPd Feature Request / Question if the Feature Request
> is something the community would use ?
>
> Background,
> Ideally we would run full tables so that we have visibility
> on reachibility of a prefix via
OpenBGPd Feature Request / Question if the Feature Request
is something the community would use ?
Background,
Ideally we would run full tables so that we have visibility
on reachibility of a prefix via a transit provider,
Problem: routers that support this functionality Reliably
are quite
