As mentioned before on misc@, some user got confused and copied the
entire rc.conf file to rc.conf.local and then proceeded editing it. This
patch brings the rc.conf man page closer to the text that is in the
OpenBSD faq. Hopefully it will help newcomers avoiding this mistake.
Index:
Em 10-02-2014 18:28, Mark Kettenis escreveu:
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 18:05:38 -0200
From: Giancarlo Razzolini grazzol...@gmail.com
As mentioned before on misc@, some user got confused and copied the
entire rc.conf file to rc.conf.local and then proceeded editing it. This
patch brings the
On 2014/02/10 18:42, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
Em 10-02-2014 18:28, Mark Kettenis escreveu:
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 18:05:38 -0200
From: Giancarlo Razzolini grazzol...@gmail.com
As mentioned before on misc@, some user got confused and copied the
entire rc.conf file to rc.conf.local and
The existing text, Create and edit a _new_ rc.conf.local file seems
fine to me - man pages are generally non-verbose - if copying was intended,
the manual would have said so.
Disagree. Create and edit... is ambiguous. I can create
a new file by copying an old file and often do so. If you
Em 10-02-2014 19:34, Marco S Hyman escreveu:
The existing text, Create and edit a _new_ rc.conf.local file seems
fine to me - man pages are generally non-verbose - if copying was intended,
the manual would have said so.
Disagree. Create and edit... is ambiguous. I can create
a new file by
I prefer this ...
--- rc.conf.8 Tue Feb 11 21:24:16 2014
+++ rc.conf.new.8 Fri Jan 3 00:44:18 2014
@@ -47,11 +47,11 @@
.Pp
It is advisable to leave
.Nm rc.conf
-untouched, and instead create and edit a new
+untouched. The
+.Nm rc.conf
+file includes a check for
.Nm rc.conf.local
