> Thanks Mouse and Martin. I got past that error. But now I'm running
> into another problem - unable to determine when write op occurs (to
> be able to return ENOSPC error).
> I want to return ENOSPC error whenever write occurs. Which variable
> contains this info? I'm confuse
till.)
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
That's part of what I was wondering.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
be fixed, but, even
if that reading is correct, I'd still be curious where it came from.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
figured it was still workt asking.
>> ... I'd still be curious where it came from.
> Those answers are CVS:
Not where it came from in the sense of who committed it or what it
looked like at the time, but rather where that person got the various
distinctions from.
/~\ The ASCII
> Also, I suspect mouse was thinking of the TCP URG concept, and not
> PUSH when he wrote what he did, but I don't know for sure.
Ouch. Yes, you are entirely correct in that regard. Total braino on
my part. My apologies.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campa
revents bitmasks is really not
useful without STREAMS.").
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
AC DM
that makes up part of a synch; ignoring the urgent bit means that
dropping won't happen. (Does that matter in practice? Probably not,
especially given how little TELNET is used outside walled gardens. But
it still is a correctness issue.)
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon
y broken, but I doubt I'd
actually find any use for the latter. I might rip out the OOB stuff
just to find and fix anything trying to use it, though.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8
don't mind losing it for
long enough to find everything using TCP "OOB".
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
roperly_?), and provided your and the peer's
implementations agree on which sequence number goes in the urgent
field.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
(If trying to build a new kernel SEGVs, maybe
cross-build it?)
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
chines? I'm wondering
if perhaps something is broken in a subtle way such that it manifests
on only certain hardware (I'm talking about something along the lines
of "this tickles erratum #2188 in stepping 478 of Intel CPUs from the
Forest Lawn family").
/~\ The ASCII
you having the resources (disk space,
time, and energy/motivation) to do that.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
that
work (or fail) in ways I did not expect.
Perhaps post a pointer to full dmesg? Someone might be able to say
something useful based on it.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8
, but that's irrelevant to this thread).
Do we (FWVO we) want to bother with such devices?
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
This can easily happen if you copy the image between disks with
different block sizes.
Now _there_ is a valid argument for doing everything in terms of bytes
(as was discussed briefly upthread).
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML
by MI code.
...or...Am I Missing Something (tm)?
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
as well, if reliable TCP mounts had existed at the time (I
don't think they did).
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
if it's
supposed to run on anything POSIX may not be fine if, say, anything
except SunOS 4.1.1 on a SPARCstation-4 is out of scope).
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D
: OSF/1 aka DEC-Unix aka Tru64-Unix did somthing like Linux +
udevd(8) over 10 years ago.
Another reason to think that it's likely worth trying.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61
Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
as a pretty crippling regression.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
something other than a serial line - on my scanner
machine, for example, /dev/scanner is a symlink to /dev/uk0, and
/dev/uk0 is mode 600 owner mouse.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8
have to shutdown cleanly, otherwise you lose DB.
Sweet jesus. Talk about brittle solutions...
Well, yes. But research efforts are like that. Robustness is pretty
much necessary for production use but not for the stage this appears to
be at.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
they get?
Presumably the database holds, among other things, information
specifying whether new nodes will appear in such a case, and, if so,
what ownership and modes they'll have.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents
no reason it couldn't have been done instead of
creating pseudo-devices as we know them today.)
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
, such as wsdisplay. (Or, more precisely,
corresponds to the same physical thing as something else.)
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
).
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
...
Well, there may be value in its not appearing in readdir() output.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
directories containing mode 666
devices, or the set-ID bit *does* control the path walk - but the
sticky bit, if set, says it also controls the access at the end of it.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email
by then)
Of course, then, people will be saying the same thing with 0x...all
we learn from history is that we never learn from history.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7
Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
does X have any way to do mouse scaling,
Not very, not core X at least. ChangePointerControl allows defining a
threshold above which pointer motion is accelerated by a specified
rational fraction (or decelerated, I suppose, if a server feels like
implementing fractions 1).
However, that's
recall
enough of mac68k to say how, but most ports have _some_ way to specify
prompt me for root c when booting.
(2) Who knows enough about WAPBL and IDE busses to guess where to
look for a possible solution to this problem?
Not me.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon
.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
.
And, given your lack of desire to do it to begin with, the question is
pretty much moot. :)
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
whether there's anything like a hierarchical filesystem
namespace there or whether they're just opaque octet-string blobs.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1
mentioned in another message a few minutes ago, I think this is
not easy to do fully right - indeed, it's not totally clear what
right is in all cases - but I do think it is easy to come close
enough to be useful.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML
.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
if the PIO is slow.
Another possibility is that the underlying hardware uses a block size
larger than 612, like 2K or 4K, and is doing a read-modify-erase-write
cycle for each 512-octet sector. Erases can be slow.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML
ports to the locking scheme du jour relatively simple.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
missing something? Does this just mean that 4.0.1
(which is what I was checking the manpages on) does not support MP on
hardware which doesn't do cache snooping, or is there some facility
I've missed for arranging for other-CPU cache flushes, or what?
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
is invalid, too, though (especially given its
date) it's unlikely anyone with deep enough pockets to take it on
cares.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1
is to mention that I have a
laptop, running 4.0.1, with an re onboard, and have never seen such
random crashes. I can give more details if they matter.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8
feel certain you are already familiar with all that. So I must
be missing something. What?
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
[...]
This is greatly cleaned up in the envsysV2 implementation.
[...]
In envsysV2, a single call is used [...]
Then there's not really anything to discuss, because it's all already
been fixed. Excellent.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML
threads. To pick two more examples the kernel maintains,
working directory and umask. These are a shared resource; like any
shared resource, accessing them from multiple threads requires care,
and usually locking of some sort.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X
enough that it's something else tied to MPness that it's
worth trying a test under a UP kernel?
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
= busmem;
#endif
Any particular reason to error-check mmap but not read?
Any particular reason to read BUFSIZE bytes but mmap sb.st_size bytes?
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61
Can't you just version it? Rename existing PT_STEP to PT_OSTEP or
something, define PT_STEP with the new value (instead of introducing
new PT_* name)?
That works for ABI compatability but not API compatability.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against
.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
, if
it wishes, desupport netmask boundaries falling other than on octet
boundaries. I would call the one a bug just as I would the other.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52
that NetBSD 4.0.1 appears to support them.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
?
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
and
useful for an obsoleted feature. Besides, this _was_ 20 years ago -
well, actually more like 15±5; I didn't have much of a house LAN
before maybe 1991, and I stopped using the address space this was
embedded in sometime around 2000-2001.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
to fchdir(), but I
suspect that if it existed people would find other uses for it.
I'm not sure what, if any, restrictions there should be on it, which is
one reason I've never actually tried to implement such a thing.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X
Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
that can be delegated.
Sounds a lot like POSIX capabilities to me - it's just that the
authority comes in, as compared to non-POSIX capabilities, relatively
coarse chunks and is passed around in a rather different way.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against
for the way I've been envisioning doing serial data.
Thoughts?
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
on the peer.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
may be better off coming at it from another angle in
any case.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
it to the real
hardware.
In the light of morning, I'm not sure this will get me what I want even
if I make it work. I need to think about it more
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email
Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
-3s
with Sun-4s.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
697976149 bytes is
697+ MB, but I suspect you're locking 666 MB, not 666 MB.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
could also be wrong about that.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
that the
mainstream architecture can be supported and other arches can be
kinda-mostly supported as long as they're close enough to x86_6^Wthe
mainstream one.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8
, and optimise it for VAX. Well, I
hope we do not design MI code to be focused on VAX.
Why not? You don't mind designing it in (other) MD ways.
If we do, then perhaps I picked the wrong project to join.. :)
One of us certainly did.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X
to a one-bit-wide operand (and with the data-to-swap-in
specified by choice of instruction rather than an operand).
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31
Already wrote about reasoning in other reply to mouse (keywords: no
code duplication, better design), so wont repeat myself.
Except you appear to think that the only options are the current state
and each arch totally doing its own thing.
There are places other than those two to draw
).
This is false. CAS, as the term is normally used, turns out to be not
the compare-and-swap the acronym expands to but
compare-and-conditionally-swap. However, BBSSI and BBCCI always
perform the write.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML
the struct type,
but you can work with pointers to them)
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
cases where this hasn't been
done and I think none at all where it couldn't be done if the relevant
software authors cared to bother.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D
that it won't even work,
unless you're willing to accept a regression in that it will totally
break namei when the current directory no longer has any name.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8
this looks as though you may
be talking about only certain filesystems, in which case it may be
acceptable).
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27
filesystem is implementation laziness.
(Justfied laziness, perhaps; laziness carries a somewhat pejorative
implication that may be not entirely deserved here, but I'm having
trouble coming up with a better word.)
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML
that defines I_FLUSH and/or FLUSHR?
I'm just brainstorming possible ways to avoid inflicting a varargs
declaration on all users of ioctl. I don't know whether there are any
issues which might break the above ideas - assuming anyone besides me
cares, that is.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
wrong?.
I don't often care about this, but when I do, there's not much
substitute I've found.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
bit-for-bit-repeatable builds presumably will), meaning
the issue I raised simply does not exist.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
can I see any excuse for poking at devices it isn't going
to use or walking all of any bus.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
on such a
bootloader, one of the first things I'd do would be to add something
functionally equivalent back, even if just a
manually-changed-when-I-care hi, I'm not the previous version
printf.)
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents
in the read-write case.)
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
it all. They were written based on, IIRC, the
3.1 interface, but based on this thread it sounds as though it's only
gotten worse since then.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52
, I'd say this definitely should support MD implementations.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
be a disaster in the making. (Not that NetBSD doesn't have plenty of
those, but that's no reason to add one more.)
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27
failures without data damage, not just one.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
number of members could be done with a fixed-depth tree. But
I would guess - not having looked - that going to three would be little
if any easier than going to an arbitrary number.)
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents
would be that it would be sd2, but that
is just a guess.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
The problem is that there might be some ports whose MAXPARTITIONS is
still 8 and such ports can't use type 8.
Nothing says fd.c has to use MAXPARTITIONS (nor the macros built using
it) when breaking up the device minor number.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
they were the
same thing described using different terminology, but that's
inconsistent with what you say here (and a few other indications I've
seen, none of them strong enough to really bring the distinction into
sharp relief the way this does).
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
, added no later than 4.2 (can't recall whether it was in
4.1c) and UFS was Sun's name for FFS when they imported it to SunOS
(this was long before Solaris). I've never totally understood the
distinction between the two as it exists in NetBSD.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon
exists that's allowing glusterfs's persistence to
interfere with the next mount. (Or, possibly, not something perfused
needs to do; it's armchair quarterbacking to an extent, but it seems to
me that this should be part of the unmount operation.)
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
.
For SOCK_SEQPACKET, yes, I think it should be the default.
Might even make sense to implement it for AF_LOCAL SOCK_DGRAM.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3
701 - 800 of 812 matches
Mail list logo
