On Wed, 11 May 2011 03:35:56 +
Jacob Meuser jake...@sdf.lonestar.org wrote:
clipping is better than normalizing? really?
Clipping might describe something like value0xff, so no, not
clipping, saturating addition.
Try it and see for yourself.
what about the case where aucat is used
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 02:50:36AM +0300, Sviatoslav Chagaev wrote:
I'm sitting at work, listening to music, debugging a web-application
with JavaScript alert()s. Each time an alert window pops up, the
browser plays a sound. For a brief moment, the volume drops twicefold
then goes back to
On Tue May 10 2011 11:35:56 PM EDT, Jacob Meuser jake...@sdf.lonestar.org
wrote:
clipping is better than normalizing?B really?
what about the case where aucat is used for offline mixing?
like the mixerctl change, you are taking away things that exist
for good reason, because it makes
On Wed May 11 2011 06:10:03 AM EDT, Brad b...@comstyle.com wrote:
oops. looks like my phone sent the empty reply when I put it back in my pocket
after reading this.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 02:50:36AM +0300, Sviatoslav Chagaev wrote:
below are few comments about the diff itself
Index: aparams.h
===
RCS file: /OpenBSD/src/usr.bin/aucat/aparams.h,v
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -r1.11
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 15:23:52 +0400, Alexander Polakov wrote:
* LEVAI Daniel l...@ecentrum.hu [110510 14:33]:
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 12:28:06 +0200, LEVAI Daniel wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 08:41:48 +0200, LEVAI Daniel wrote:
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 23:48:46 +0400, Alexander
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 03:44:45AM +0200, Ariane van der Steldt wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 03:43:19AM +0200, Ariane van der Steldt wrote:
The newest version of vmmap (as of now) is vmmap_sys.diff.26
Since the diff is scheduled to go in may 20 and has a lot of changes and
fixes, please
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 09:45:05AM +0300, Sviatoslav Chagaev wrote:
On Wed, 11 May 2011 03:35:56 +
Jacob Meuser jake...@sdf.lonestar.org wrote:
clipping is better than normalizing? really?
Clipping might describe something like value0xff, so no, not
clipping, saturating
On Wed, 11 May 2011 13:07:12 +0200
Alexandre Ratchov a...@caoua.org wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 02:50:36AM +0300, Sviatoslav Chagaev wrote:
below are few comments about the diff itself
Index: aparams.h
===
RCS file:
On Wed, 11 May 2011 13:25:47 +0200
Alexandre Ratchov a...@caoua.org wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 09:45:05AM +0300, Sviatoslav Chagaev wrote:
On Wed, 11 May 2011 03:35:56 +
Jacob Meuser jake...@sdf.lonestar.org wrote:
clipping is better than normalizing? really?
Clipping
On Wed, 11 May 2011 19:58:56 +
Jacob Meuser jake...@sdf.org wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 09:45:05AM +0300, Sviatoslav Chagaev wrote:
On Wed, 11 May 2011 03:35:56 +
Jacob Meuser jake...@sdf.lonestar.org wrote:
clipping is better than normalizing? really?
Clipping might
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 12:37:15AM +0300, Sviatoslav Chagaev wrote:
My impression is that the opposite is true on tech@: if you don't have
a diff -- it's just empty, useless talk and you shouldn't post if you
don't have a diff.
Besides, looking from an ordinary Joe User viewpoint, I don't
The files below change with every build because they include the `date`
they were generated (and etcsum changes because it references some of the
files that keep changing).
/etc/mail/localhost.cf
/etc/mail/sendmail.cf
/etc/mail/submit.cf
/usr/share/info/dir
/var/db/sysmerge/etcsum
The patch
Hopefully one day adduser(8), will have use warnings; added to it.
However, when that glorious does come, any existing adduser.conf files
created by adduser(8) will generate warnings because the template
adduser(8) uses to create adduser.conf has some unquoted strings.
This diff allows any future
14 matches
Mail list logo
