On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 2:59 PM, Michael McConville wrote:
> As jmc@ asked when I shared this with him, is there a remaining use of
> our custom gcc -CC flag now that lint(1) is gone? It seems like it could
> be useful for general macro debugging, but I'm not sure. Even if not,
Hi Michael,
Michael McConville wrote on Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 05:18:52PM -0800:
> This is specified only irregularly, and people who don't know what a
> void return type means are beyond help anyway.
I don't feel strongly either way, but i certainly don't object.
Usually shorter with the same
Hi,
Daniel Dickman wrote on Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 02:11:49PM -0500:
> ps. if I'm reading things right, "head -c" will be in Posix, Issue 8.
> http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=407#c743
Oh indeed, thanks for digging up that decision, useful indeed.
Well, that definitely settles the matter.
The urtwn(4) driver uses usbd_is_dying() calls in its timeouts.
usbd_is_dying() can't be part of the common rtwn(4) driver code once we
merge code from urtwn(4). So timeouts must move back to the bus-specific
part of the driver.
The common driver code now indicates when timeouts must be
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 05:18:52PM -0800, Michael McConville wrote:
> This is specified only irregularly, and people who don't know what a
> void return type means are beyond help anyway.
>
> This also adds a sentence specifying that X509_free(3) is NULL-safe, now
> that we've removed all
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2016/03/10 19:18, Stefan Kempf wrote:
> > There's still at least one issue with the diff. Again in amap_extend().
> > The slotalloc computation was still off :-(
>
> It's not perfect but this is very significantly better. I've put
> it under load and the machine is
Hi,
a collegue of mine recently tried to get OpenBSD running on an HP E820
laptop. Apparently this machine is UEFI only and its BIOS only works
in a 240x56 text mode.
So he did the patch below to add support for this mode to efiboot.
I've asked him to provide us a dmesg and acpidump for this
When sbrk() allocates a range of virtual memory, it immediately allocates
a vm_amap and an am_slots array inside the amap There's one slot per page
allocated, and a slot is 16 bytes in size (on 64 bit CPUs, 12 on 32 bit
CPUs).
Preallocating slots makes sense mostly when we know that the memory
There are bunch of ioctl definitions kdump(1) doesn't know about yet,
with the result, that kdump prints the numerical value of the ioctl and
not the name of the definition.
This patch adds support for ipmi, vscsi, pvbus, udl, fuse, trunk, pipex
and memrange.
OK?
natano
Index: Makefile
Gregor Best attempted to improve the scheduler in 2011:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.tech/27059
Here is another attempt, it takes up where the previous one left off.
This is also mostly based on the main idea behind Linux CFS or
BFS. I found BFS to be described more clearly:
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 2:47 AM, Martin Natano wrote:
> There are bunch of ioctl definitions kdump(1) doesn't know about yet,
> with the result, that kdump prints the numerical value of the ioctl and
> not the name of the definition.
>
> This patch adds support for ipmi, vscsi,
Should httpd(8) also mention services(5)?
Jan
Index: httpd.conf.5
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/httpd/httpd.conf.5,v
retrieving revision 1.68
diff -u -p -r1.68 httpd.conf.5
--- httpd.conf.519 Jul 2015 05:17:27
No, that is the roadmap that leads to ls(1) and ed(1) having
Xr to 50 other pages.
> Should httpd(8) also mention services(5)?
>
> Jan
>
>
> Index: httpd.conf.5
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/httpd/httpd.conf.5,v
>
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 05:36:21PM +0100, Michal Mazurek wrote:
> Gregor Best attempted to improve the scheduler in 2011:
> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.tech/27059
> Here is another attempt, it takes up where the previous one left off.
>
> This is also mostly based on the main idea
Marc Espie wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 05:18:52PM -0800, Michael McConville wrote:
> > This is specified only irregularly, and people who don't know what a
> > void return type means are beyond help anyway.
> >
> > This also adds a sentence specifying that X509_free(3) is NULL-safe, now
> >
Noted here, https://github.com/libressl-portable/portable/issues/161, we
document a non-existent constant in the examples
for EVP_PKEY_CTX_set_rsa_padding. Is this the correct one to use?
Index: EVP_PKEY_decrypt.pod
===
RCS file:
As jmc@ asked when I shared this with him, is there a remaining use of
our custom gcc -CC flag now that lint(1) is gone? It seems like it could
be useful for general macro debugging, but I'm not sure. Even if not,
removing it might be more effort than it's worth.
I'm interested to hear what
Tried to start this project last week, but kept f'ing it up.
Index: src/games/adventure/crc.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/games/adventure/crc.c,v
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -p -u -r1.7 crc.c
--- src/games/adventure/crc.c27 Oct
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 08:35:31PM +0100, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 05:36:21PM +0100, Michal Mazurek wrote:
> > Gregor Best attempted to improve the scheduler in 2011:
> > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.tech/27059
> > Here is another attempt, it
It looks like sshd(8) has permitted for a while both AllowUsers and
DenyUsers in sshd_config(5) to use addresses in CIDR address/masklen
format. If so, it would be useful to mention in the manual page.
/Lars
Index: sshd_config.5
20 matches
Mail list logo