Hi tech@,
I wrote a driver to control the APU1 LEDs and read the state of
the pushbutton switch, like skgpio(4).
I would like some reviews and hints about some project decisions
that I have to make. I am cooking a diff to support APU{2,3,4},
but it is an extension of this code.
Setup:
Machine:
Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
> it is, however -Fall operates on main ruleset only. -Fall also does
> not reset limits and timeouts. Hence my first idea was to introduce
> '-FNuke', which kills all rulesets and tables.
>
> I don't want to change behaviour of existing option
Hello,
> > > > Isn't -U pretty close to -Fall ?
> > > >
> > >
> > > it is, however -Fall operates on main ruleset only. -Fall also does
> > > not reset limits and timeouts. Hence my first idea was to introduce
> > > '-FNuke', which kills all rulesets and tables.
> > >
> > > I
Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
> how about making the '-U' (or whatever name we agree) undocumented. We can
> also make the option available if pfctl will get compiled with 'DEBUG'
> option (assuming we are doing regress on debug bits anyway).
no, it should be documented.
but few
On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 10:03:15PM +1300, Richard Procter wrote:
> The ldpd issue might merit a hint in the man page as I found it difficult to
> diagnose
> as a newbie (see attached patch), and the man page, while not wrong, threw me
> by
> stating that GTSM is mandatory for LDPv6; it is now
On Sun, Mar 24 2019, Mitchell Krome wrote:
> On 24/03/2019 7:23 am, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>> Sebastian Benoit wrote:
>>
>>> Mitchell Krome(mitchellkr...@gmail.com) on 2019.03.23 20:27:17 +1000:
Was messing around with ospf and got myself into a situation where the
router ID's were the
On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 06:07:02PM +0100, Michał Koc wrote:
> ... [snip]
This is almost good. You might fold host_ip() into net_set_sa(). the
double malloc and copy isn't really needed.
-Otto
Hi,
The following diff adds missing documentation for the -l option of
reboot(8) as its done in NetBSD.
Bye,
Jan
Index: reboot.8
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sbin/reboot/reboot.8,v
retrieving revision 1.50
diff -u -p -r1.50 reboot.8
---
When you see a comment like this, it means it is intentionally
undocumented.
It is the current mechanism shutdown uses. It could use a different
mechanism in the future. It is done this way so that noone else depends
on it. If you document this user-visible, they will come to depend on
it,
On 24/03/19(Sun) 20:16, Lawrence Teo wrote:
> This diff modifies divert_packet() to increment the divs_errors counter
> on if_get failure so that users will be aware of it via netstat(1).
If if_get(9) fails that means the interface no longer exists. Is it an
error? Or a delayed free? Did we
On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 11:30:15PM -0600, Randy Hartman wrote:
> ssl(8) man page changed example key size from 2048 to 4096
> in 2012 but reverted after two days. smtpd.conf(5)'s man page
> and acme-client both use 4096. is it time to un-revert?
>
fixed, thanks.
jmc
> Index: ssl.8
>
Hi,
My guess is that flag actually refers to atflags.
Comments? OK?
Index: chflags.2
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/lib/libc/sys/chflags.2,v
retrieving revision 1.27
diff -u -p -r1.27 chflags.2
--- chflags.2 19 Jan 2015 15:54:11 -
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 02:43:26PM +0100, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 24 2019, Mitchell Krome wrote:
> > On 24/03/2019 7:23 am, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> >> Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> >>
> >>> Mitchell Krome(mitchellkr...@gmail.com) on 2019.03.23 20:27:17 +1000:
> Was messing
On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 21:44:45 +0100, Anton Lindqvist wrote:
> My guess is that flag actually refers to atflags.
Yes, looks like copy pasta from fchmodat. OK millert@
- todd
On Mon, Mar 25 2019, Anton Lindqvist wrote:
> Hi,
> My guess is that flag actually refers to atflags.
>
> Comments? OK?
ok jca@
> Index: chflags.2
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/lib/libc/sys/chflags.2,v
> retrieving revision 1.27
>
this has a couple of fixes, nothing particularly major. we already
had the fix for "#4225: clients seem to erroneously receive no answer
with DNS-over-TLS and qname-minimisation" backported.
working here, anyone else want to test?
Index: doc/Changelog
Theo de Raadt(dera...@openbsd.org) on 2019.03.24 10:22:25 -0600:
> Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 09:51:13AM +0100, Denis Fondras wrote:
> > > On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 09:24:34AM +0100, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
> > > > I think all the above calls for a new standalone
On Mon, Mar 25 2019, Remi Locherer wrote:
[...]
> This works and it makes sense to me.
>
> The log message is a bit lengthy compared to other log messages produced
> by ospfd. Maybe something like this: "router-id changed: restart required"
Yep, fine with me.
> But the patch is also OK remi@
ok
Jeremie Courreges-Anglas(j...@wxcvbn.org) on 2019.03.25 14:43:26 +0100:
> On Sun, Mar 24 2019, Mitchell Krome wrote:
> > On 24/03/2019 7:23 am, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> >> Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> >>
> >>> Mitchell Krome(mitchellkr...@gmail.com) on 2019.03.23 20:27:17 +1000:
> Was
19 matches
Mail list logo
