> Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2020 20:05:08 +1000
> From: Jonathan Matthew
>
> A few more km_alloc()s following the same pattern as acpi. I don't have any
> machines that actually need mpbios(4) but I've booted amd64 and i386 smp qemu
> vms with acpi disabled, which causes mpbios to attach instead.
>
>
A few more km_alloc()s following the same pattern as acpi. I don't have any
machines that actually need mpbios(4) but I've booted amd64 and i386 smp qemu
vms with acpi disabled, which causes mpbios to attach instead.
ok?
Index: arch/amd64/amd64/mpbios.c
> On Dec 18, 2020, at 20:16, joshua stein wrote:
>
> On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 at 18:58:43 -0600, Scott Cheloha wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> tpm(4) is the last driver in the tree using tvtohz(9). There are no
>> remaining callers using tstohz(9), so if and when we remove tvtohz(9)
>> from tpm(4) we can
On 18/12/20(Fri) 08:04, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 13:34:39 +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>
> > Anyway, your analysis is right. When a kernel thread wants to use
> > pmap_extract(9) on a userland pmap, it needs to lock pm_apte_mtx to
> > prevent another thread from simultaniously
Hi,
The current sndiod resampling algorithm is very basic mainly to keep
CPU usage very low, which used to make sense for the zaurus. So,
resampling produces aliasing noise, easily audible in 8kHz to 48kHz
conversions but present in other cases.
The diff below reduces the aliasing noise. It's a
Hi,
In revision 1.87 of ip_icmp.c claudio@ added ignoring reject routes
to icmp_mtudisc_clone(). Otherwise TCP would clone these routes
for PMTU discovery. They will not work, even after dynamic routing
has found a better route than the reject route.
With IPsec the use case is different.
On Sat, 19 Dec 2020 18:07:41 -0300, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> A solution based on a comment and a non-enabled by option seems very
> fragile to me. I came up with the idea of poisoning the ipl of the
> mutex. What do you think?
Even better. OK millert@
- todd
I'm in favour of this change, since I like proper nomenclature.
But I think you should push this one to its logical conclusion and also
rename the enum and potential other pony/klondike references, because
with your diff the naming is inconsistent, which is even more confusing.
martijn@
On Sat,
Personally I'd rather wait to keep the names in sync, especially since
it's an easy 2 line diff that can easily be incorperated in the bigger
thing. But it's not something I'm going to loose sleep over if others
thing it can go in right now.
On Sat, 2020-12-19 at 22:22 +, gil...@poolp.org
On 2020-12-18, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> So I ended up in doas again, this time with the CFLAGS I use for most of
> my other projects. This popped up a few new not very exciting warnings.
> Diff below compiles clean with both clang and gcc on amd64.
> static int
> match(uid_t uid, gid_t
On 12/18/20 5:04 PM, Jordan Geoghegan wrote:
On 12/17/20 3:15 AM, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
Hi,
as noted on misc dig does not like to talk to local link addresses.
This fixes that case. While investigating I also found another bug:
selecting v6 or v4 addresses only from resolv.conf via the -4
There are thousands of people with smtpd configurations, and sysmerge
is not going to handle this.
We cannot expect them all to change their files. This is madness.
Gilles, I think you should be adding an option that blocks it optionally,
and then some operators can use that. If they wish. I
I like this direction but I worry about breaking existing configs.
How are we going to alert existing users that they need to update
their configs if the behavior silently changes?
- todd
Todd C. Miller wrote:
> I like this direction but I worry about breaking existing configs.
> How are we going to alert existing users that they need to update
> their configs if the behavior silently changes?
I think the configuration is backwards.
Every endpoint box will need these new
Hello,
Whenever a rule with a local action (mbox, maildir, lmtp or mda) is matched,
smtpd will
attempt to search for a ~/.forward file in the recipient directory and process
it. This
may be convenient for some setups but it is an implicit behavior that's not
overridable
and not always wanted.
December 19, 2020 11:26 PM, "Martijn van Duren"
wrote:
> Personally I'd rather wait to keep the names in sync, especially since
> it's an easy 2 line diff that can easily be incorperated in the bigger
> thing. But it's not something I'm going to loose sleep over if others
> thing it can go in
Hello,
A very long time ago, smtpd had several more processes which then got factored
into a single one. We couldn't find a decent name back then but since a hacker
had requested a pony from me I temporarily named the process "pony express" as
it was in charge of delivering mail. Later, reyk
Hello,
As is done in other MTA, smtpd allows execution of a custom command in forward
files so
users can plug their procmail, fdm and other. It is currently not possible to
allow the
users to forward their mail through a .forward file without also allowing them
to run a
custom mda.
This diff
I like it. I always forget which role the pony process performs.
- todd
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 09:06:21PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> This is present in the latest release upstream, could you report it
> there please?
> https://invisible-island.net/ncurses/announce.html#h2-development
>
> SEE ALSO are usually in (at least roughly) alphabetical order so it's
>
On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 10:36:32PM +, gil...@poolp.org wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Whenever a rule with a local action (mbox, maildir, lmtp or mda) is matched,
> smtpd will
> attempt to search for a ~/.forward file in the recipient directory and
> process it. This
> may be convenient for some
I agree but I thought this should be done in a second time as it is quite
invasive and not required for the change to be visible outside the daemon
December 19, 2020 11:13 PM, "Martijn van Duren"
wrote:
> I'm in favour of this change, since I like proper nomenclature.
> But I think you should
Last diff of the series:
This introduces the same logic as forward-file for executing commands.
Executing commands from aliases should be discouraged as you can always achieve
the same
through a forward file and benefit from the privilege separation of running a
command as
a separate user
23 matches
Mail list logo
