On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 04:36:57PM -0400, Ashton Fagg wrote:
> The following diffs adds iwm(4) to the riscv64 kernel config.
>
> I tested this with the following device:
>
> iwm0 at pci5 dev 0 function 0 "Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 9260" rev 0x29,
> intx
>
> icarus$ ifconfig iwm0
> iwm0:
On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 10:39:49PM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> Okay, the nanosleep.2 changes are committed, let's do sleep.3 next.
>
hi.
the changes read fine to me. only one comment:
> Here's a changelist by section. I have some questions in there at end
> of sections where I'm unsure
> From: Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
> Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2021 04:31:20 +0200
>
> On Sat, Jul 24 2021, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> >> From: Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
> >> Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2021 21:22:23 +0200
> >>
> >> hifive /usr/src/regress/sys/kern/gettimeofday$ doas -u build time
> >>
On 2021/07/25 14:55, Jonathan Matthew wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 10:45:17PM -0400, Ashton Fagg wrote:
> > I have two devices here based on the JMicron JMB585 chipset. This diff
> > adds the required pcidev IDs and sets disables native command queuing in
> > the driver. FreeBSD does something
> Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2021 12:08:09 +0100
> From: Stuart Henderson
>
> On 2021/07/25 14:55, Jonathan Matthew wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 10:45:17PM -0400, Ashton Fagg wrote:
> > > I have two devices here based on the JMicron JMB585 chipset. This diff
> > > adds the required pcidev IDs and
On 2021/07/25 13:25, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2021 12:08:09 +0100
> > From: Stuart Henderson
> >
> > On 2021/07/25 14:55, Jonathan Matthew wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 10:45:17PM -0400, Ashton Fagg wrote:
> > > > I have two devices here based on the JMicron JMB585
> Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2021 13:25:49 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Mark Kettenis
>
> > Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2021 12:08:09 +0100
> > From: Stuart Henderson
> >
> > On 2021/07/25 14:55, Jonathan Matthew wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 10:45:17PM -0400, Ashton Fagg wrote:
> > > > I have two devices here
> Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2021 12:29:21 +0100
> From: Stuart Henderson
>
> On 2021/07/25 13:25, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2021 12:08:09 +0100
> > > From: Stuart Henderson
> > >
> > > On 2021/07/25 14:55, Jonathan Matthew wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 10:45:17PM -0400,
cc'ing cheloha@ since he probably cares about this.
On Sun, Jul 25 2021, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> From: Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
>> Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2021 04:31:20 +0200
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 24 2021, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> >> From: Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
>> >> Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2021
Sebastian Benoit writes:
> An errata patch for the relayd application layer gateway daemon has
> been released for OpenBSD 6.9.
>
> relayd(8), when using the the http protocol strip filter directive or http
> protocol macro expansion, processes format strings.
>
> Binary updates for the amd64,
Stuart Henderson writes:
> That FreeBSD commit prevents using their "hw.ahci.force" tunable on the
> device, it's used for attaching as AHCI to certain known chips even if
> they're set in legacy IDE mode.
>
> Does it work to just add the vid/pid to the ahci_devices[] array
> without a specific
Scott Cheloha wrote:
> Given this, I want to tell the reader, roughly:
>
> "hey! it's plausible there is a SIGALRM-based sleep() implementation
>using still floating around out there in the wild. If you find one,
>you'll want to avoid using it because there are unfixable
Scott Cheloha wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 25, 2021 at 01:35:19PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > This is a lot of fuss.
> >
> > How many bugs have you found relating to this issue?
> >
> > Let me guess: zero?
>
> Right, that's why I'm asking if we need to make a portability
> recommendation at all.
On 24/07/21(Sat) 11:43, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> Diff below adds an extra argument, a pointer to the socket corresponding
> to the buffer given to: sballoc(), sbfree(), sbcompress(), sbcheck() and
> sbdroprecord().
>
> This pointer will be used to assert for or grab a per-socket lock.
>
> There
This is a lot of fuss.
How many bugs have you found relating to this issue?
Let me guess: zero?
Scott Cheloha wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 25, 2021 at 08:15:34AM +0100, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 10:39:49PM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> > > Okay, the nanosleep.2 changes are
An errata patch for the relayd application layer gateway daemon has
been released for OpenBSD 6.9.
relayd(8), when using the the http protocol strip filter directive or http
protocol macro expansion, processes format strings.
Binary updates for the amd64, i386, and arm64 platform are available
On Sun, Jul 25, 2021 at 01:35:19PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> This is a lot of fuss.
>
> How many bugs have you found relating to this issue?
>
> Let me guess: zero?
Right, that's why I'm asking if we need to make a portability
recommendation at all.
We could also say something like:
On Sun, Jul 25, 2021 at 08:15:34AM +0100, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 10:39:49PM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> > Okay, the nanosleep.2 changes are committed, let's do sleep.3 next.
>
> hi.
>
> the changes read fine to me. only one comment:
>
> > [...]
> >
> > STANDARDS
> >
On Sun, Jul 25, 2021 at 02:30:01PM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 25, 2021 at 08:15:34AM +0100, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 10:39:49PM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> > > Okay, the nanosleep.2 changes are committed, let's do sleep.3 next.
> >
> > hi.
> >
> > the
On Sun, Jul 25, 2021 at 05:21:19PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Scott Cheloha wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jul 25, 2021 at 01:35:19PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > > This is a lot of fuss.
> > >
> > > How many bugs have you found relating to this issue?
> > >
> > > Let me guess: zero?
> >
> >
20 matches
Mail list logo
