Index: region.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/mg/region.c,v
retrieving revision 1.40
diff -u -p -r1.40 region.c
--- region.c8 Mar 2023 04:43:11 - 1.40
+++ region.c27 Mar 2023 16:48:08 -
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
Hello,
On 2023/03/28 00:53:05 +0800, lux wrote:
> Index: region.c
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/mg/region.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.40
> diff -u -p -r1.40 region.c
> --- region.c 8 Mar 2023 04:43:11 - 1.40
> +++
Index:
region.c===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/mg/region.c,v
retrieving revision 1.40
diff -u -p -r1.40 region.c
--- region.c 8 Mar 2023 04:43:11 - 1.40
+++ region.c 27 Mar 2023 16:38:41 -
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 10:02:05PM +0100, Theo Buehler wrote:
> > Thus, I would suggest to set this constant to ELAST. So, we will avoid
> > useless unknown error strings and a non-zero errno after tls_init().
>
> ELAST isn't portable. It's under __BSD_VISIBLE in sys/errno.h.
>
> It would seem
On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 09:59:47AM +0200, Jan Klemkow wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 10:02:05PM +0100, Theo Buehler wrote:
> > > Thus, I would suggest to set this constant to ELAST. So, we will avoid
> > > useless unknown error strings and a non-zero errno after tls_init().
> >
> > ELAST isn't
On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 08:36:06PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > From: Klemens Nanni
> > We must not throw away all errors, dd(1) can be silenced properly.
Same for the other ARM.
> To be honest I think we should remove this from the installer scripts.
>
> This code tries to handle the case
On Mon, 27 Mar 2023 20:06:30 +0200, Omar Polo wrote:
> Is _PATH_BSHELL portable though? I can see a few stuff that uses it
> (vi among others) but I'm not sure.
The paths.h header is a BSD invention, though it may be present on
some other systems. I don't think that's a reason not to use it
